Article

Fostering epilepsy self management: The perspectives of professionals

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.
Epilepsy & Behavior (Impact Factor: 2.06). 11/2010; 19(3):255-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.08.033
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Epilepsy clinical, academic, and human service professionals (N = 101) were surveyed regarding the challenges people with epilepsy face managing their condition. 30% of the respondents had personal experience with epilepsy. Interviews were transcribed and coded into themes. Response differences by profession and personal experience were examined using chi-squared tests. The two greatest challenges reported most frequently for people with epilepsy were finding high quality health care and managing psychological and emotional effects. The two most important epilepsy outcomes were seizure control and quality of life. The two greatest challenges facing clinicians were too little time with patients and limited clinical focus. The two main weaknesses in the field were insufficient research and narrow approaches to addressing epilepsy. Significant differences in responses across professions were evident as were differences according to personal experience with epilepsy. Few clinicians cited quality of care as a major challenge (p<0.0001) compared to other professions. Few respondents with personal experience with epilepsy cited stigma as a challenge (p = 0.006).

Full-text

Available from: Marie Sweetman, Aug 11, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
175 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this large-scale, multinational, descriptive survey, we sought to identify measures for improving treatment outcomes for individuals with epilepsy. As a framework, questions relating specifically to each of the five steps of the ‘patient–physician journey’, namely, patient identification (omitted in this survey), diagnosis, choice of drug, disease and drug information, and patient monitoring were asked. Overall, 337 physicians and 1150 patients across France, Germany, and the United States returned questionnaires. Results indicated that 16% of the patients were initially misdiagnosed. Treatment choice was driven by efficacy, safety, experience with a drug (physician only), and convenience (patient only). Physicians were identified as the primary source of information for patients, and, as expected, better informed patients were found to adhere better to their therapy than those who were less well informed. Approximately 50% of the patients had not seen their specialist in the last year, which indicates poor follow-up; furthermore, important topics such as seizures, treatment, and its side effects were not discussed at every visit. Specialists, but not primary care practitioners (PCPs), consistently reported discussing all topics more frequently than their patients, suggesting that specialists may overestimate the clarity of their questions. There was also substantial disparity in the reasons cited for nonadherence — patients overwhelmingly cited forgetfulness, while both PCPs and specialists cited complacency, forgetfulness, and tolerability. We also noted a disparity between physicians and their patients, as well as between PCPs and specialists, in their views on the impact of epilepsy on patients' lives. Our results indicate multiple opportunities to intervene at all stages of the patient–physician journey to improve treatment outcomes. We provide practical suggestions to achieve the most from these opportunities.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 05/2014; 34:58–67. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.02.033 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network was established in 2007 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epilepsy Program to expand epilepsy self-management research. The network has employed collaborative research strategies to develop, test, and disseminate evidence-based, community-based, and e-Health interventions (e-Tools) for epilepsy self-management for people with epilepsy, caregivers, and health-care providers. Since its inception, MEW Network collaborators have conducted formative studies (n=7) investigating the potential of e-Health to support epilepsy self-management and intervention studies evaluating e-Tools (n=5). The MEW e-Tools (the MEW website, WebEase, UPLIFT, MINDSET, and PEARLS online training) and affiliated e-Tools (Texting 4 Control) are designed to complement self-management practices in each phase of the epilepsy care continuum. These tools exemplify a concerted research agenda, shared methodological principles and models for epilepsy self-management, and a communal knowledge base for implementing e-Health to improve quality of life for people with epilepsy.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 08/2013; 29(1):133-140. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.07.002 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Some people with chronic epilepsy (PWE) make clinically unnecessary, and potentially avoidable, visits to hospital emergency departments. Whilst expensive, it is not known how to reduce them. We recently conducted the first trial of an epilepsy-nurse specialist intervention which aimed to optimise self-management skills in PWE attending emergency departments and advise them on appropriate emergency services use. Based on in-depth semi-structured interviews, we here report the perceived support needs of patients who have attended a emergency department for epilepsy and the benefits of the intervention which they identified. Nested qualitative study. After receiving the intervention, 20 participants were invited to interview. They described their experience of the intervention, to what extent they valued it and its benefits and limitations. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Most valued the additional support. Those who previously used emergency departments most perceived greatest benefit. Participants felt it redressed limitations to usual care, including providing information about living with epilepsy, and an opportunity to discuss feelings about epilepsy. Perceived benefits included improvements in emotional well-being, confidence dealing with seizures and medication adherence. The intervention was acceptable to patients. People with epilepsy who had attended a emergency department on more than one occasion perceived most benefit. This suggests they want additional care. Some perceived benefits in domains possibly causally related to emergency department use. This suggests the intervention, with optimisation, may have the components to reduce emergency department visits. Our results provide insights into how to support PWE who attend emergency departments and how needs differ amongst this group.
    Journal of Neurology 11/2012; 260(4). DOI:10.1007/s00415-012-6749-2 · 3.84 Impact Factor