Assessment of algorithms for predicting drug-drug interactions via inhibition mechanisms: comparison of dynamic and static models.

School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (Impact Factor: 3.58). 01/2011; 71(1):72-87. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03799.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The prediction of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) from in vitro data usually utilizes an average dosing interval estimate of inhibitor concentration in an equation-based static model. Simcyp®, a population-based ADME simulator, is becoming widely used for the prediction of DDIs and has the ability to incorporate the time-course of inhibitor concentration and hence generate a temporal profile of the inhibition process within a dynamic model.
Prediction of DDIs for 35 clinical studies incorporating a representative range of drug-drug interactions, with multiple studies across different inhibitors and victim drugs. Assessment of whether the inclusion of the time course of inhibition in the dynamic model improves prediction in comparison with the static model. Investigation of the impact of different inhibitor and victim drug parameters on DDI prediction accuracy including dosing time and the inclusion of active metabolites. Assessment of ability of the dynamic model to predict inter-individual variability in the DDI magnitude.
Static and dynamic models (incorporating the time course of the inhibitor) were assessed for their ability to predict drug-drug interactions (DDIs) using a population-based ADME simulator (Simcyp®V8). The impact of active metabolites, dosing time and the ability to predict inter-individual variability in DDI magnitude were investigated using the dynamic model.
Thirty-five in vivo DDIs involving azole inhibitors and benzodiazepines were predicted using the static and dynamic model; both models were employed within Simcyp for consistency in parameters. Simulations comprised of 10 trials with matching population demographics and dosage regimen to the in vivo studies. Predictive utility of the static and dynamic model was assessed relative to the inhibitor or victim drug investigated.
Use of the dynamic and static models resulted in comparable prediction success, with 71 and 77% of DDIs predicted within two-fold, respectively. Over 40% of strong DDIs (>five-fold AUC increase) were under-predicted by both models. Incorporation of the itraconazole metabolite into the dynamic model resulted in increased prediction accuracy of strong DDIs (80% within two-fold). Bias and imprecision in prediction of triazolam DDIs were higher in comparison with midazolam and alprazolam; >50% of triazolam DDIs were under-predicted regardless of the model used. Predicted inter-individual variability in the AUC ratio (coefficient of variation of 45%) was consistent with the observed variability (50%).
High prediction accuracy was observed using both the Simcyp dynamic and static models. The differences observed with the dose staggering and the incorporation of active metabolite highlight the importance of these variables in DDI prediction.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Accurate predictions of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) account for dynamic changes of CYP3A activity at both major expression sites (liver and gut wall) by considering the full pharmacokinetic profile of the perpetrator and the substrate. Physiological-based in vitro-in vivo extrapolation models have become of increasing interest. However, due to discrepancies between the predicted and observed magnitude of DDIs, the role of models fully based on in vivo data is still essential. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to develop a coupled dynamic model for the interaction of the CYP3A inhibitor voriconazole and the prototypical CYP3A substrate midazolam. METHODS: Raw concentration data were obtained from a DDI study. Ten subjects were given either no pretreatment (control) or voriconazole twice daily orally. Midazolam was given either intravenously or orally after the last voriconazole dose and during control phases. Data analysis was performed by the population pharmacokinetic approach using non-linear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM 7.2.0). Model evaluation was performed using visual predictive checks and bootstrap analysis. RESULTS: A semiphysiological model was able to describe the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, its major metabolite and voriconazole simultaneously. By considering the temporal disposition of all three substances in the liver and gut wall, a time-varying CYP3A inhibition process was implemented. Only the incorporation of hypothetical enzyme site compartments resulted in an adequate fit, suggesting a sustained inhibitory effect through accumulation. Novel key features of this analysis are the identification of (1) an apparent sustained inhibitory effect by voriconazole due to a proposed quasi accumulation at the enzyme site, (2) a significantly reduced inhibitory potency of intravenous voriconazole for oral substrates, (3) voriconazole as a likely uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B inhibitor and (4) considerable sources of interindividual variability. CONCLUSION: The proposed semiphysiological modelling approach generated a mechanistic description of the complex DDI occurring at major CYP3A expression sites and thus may serve as a powerful tool to maximise information acquired from clinical DDI studies. The model has been shown to draw precise and accurate predictions. Therefore, simulations based on this kind of models may be used for various clinical scenarios to improve pharmacotherapy.
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics 05/2013; · 6.11 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Currently, quantitative prediction of the impact of genetic polymorphism and drug-drug interactions mediated by cytochromes, based on in vivo data, is made by two separate methods and restricted to a single cytochrome. We propose a unified approach for describing the combined impact of drug-drug interactions and genetic polymorphism on drug exposure. It relies on in vivo data and uses the following three characteristic parameters: one for the victim drug, one for the interacting drug, and another for the genotype. These parameters are known for a wide range of drugs and genotypes. The metrics of interest are the ratio of victim drug area under the curve (AUC) in patients with genetic variants taking both drugs, to the AUC in patients with either variant or wild-type genotype taking the victim drug alone. The approach was evaluated by external validation, comparing predicted and observed AUC ratios found in the literature. Data were found for 22 substrates, 30 interacting drugs, and 38 substrate-interacting drug couples. The mean prediction error of AUC ratios was 0.02, and the mean prediction absolute error was 0.38 and 1.34, respectively. The model may be used to predict the variations in exposure resulting from a number of drug-drug-genotype combinations. The proposed approach will help (1) to identify comedications and population at risk, (2) to adapt dosing regimens, and (3) to prioritize the clinical pharmacokinetic studies to be done.
    The AAPS Journal 09/2013; · 4.39 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Static and dynamic (PBPK) prediction models were applied to estimate the drug-drug interaction (DDI) risk of AZD2066. The predictions were compared to the results of an in vivo cocktail study. Various in vivo measures for tolbutamide as a probe agent for cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) were also compared. In vitro inhibition data for AZD2066 were obtained using human liver microsomes and CYP-specific probe substrates. DDI prediction was performed using PBPK modelling with the SimCYP simulator™ or static model. The cocktail study was an open label, baseline, controlled interaction study with 15 healthy volunteers receiving multiple doses of AD2066 for 12 days. A cocktail of single doses of 100 mg caffeine (CYP1A2 probe), 500 mg tolbutamide (CYP2C9 probe), 20 mg omeprazole (CYP2C19 probe) and 7.5 mg midazolam (CYP3A probe) was simultaneously applied at baseline and during the administration of AZD2066. Bupropion as a CYP2B6 probe (150 mg) and 100 mg metoprolol (CYP2D6 probe) were administered on separate days. The pharmacokinetic parameters for the probe drugs and their metabolites in plasma and urinary recovery were determined. In vitro AZD2066 inhibited CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. The static model predicted in vivo interaction with predicted AUC ratio values of >1.1 for all CYP (except CYP3A4). The PBPK simulations predicted no risk for clinical relevant interactions. The cocktail study showed no interaction for the CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 enzymes, a possible weak inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 activities and a slight inhibition (29 %) of CYP2D6 activity. The tolbutamide phenotyping metrics indicated that there were significant correlations between CLform and AUCTOL, CL, Aemet and LnTOL24h. The MRAe in urine showed no correlation to CLform. CONCLUSIONS: DDI prediction using the static approach based on total concentration indicated that AZD20066 has a potential risk for inhibition. However, no DDI risk could be predicted when a more in vivo-like dynamic prediction method with the PBPK with SimCYP™ software based on early human PK data was used and more parameters (i.e. free fraction in plasma, no DDI risk) were taken into account. The clinical cocktail study showed no or low risks for clinical relevant DDI interactions. Our findings are in line with the hypothesis that the dynamic prediction method predicts DDI in vivo in humans better than the static model based on total plasma concentrations.
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 11/2013; · 2.74 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Sep 16, 2013