Predictors of Sexual Desire Disorders in Women

Obstetrics/Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Journal of Sexual Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.15). 12/2010; 8(3):742-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02146.x
Source: PubMed


A historic belief was that testosterone was the "hormone of desire." However, recent data, which show either minimal or no significant correlation between testosterone levels and women's sexual desire, suggest that nonhormonal variables may play a key role.
To compare women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) and those with the recently proposed more symptomatic desire disorder, Sexual Desire/Interest Disorder (SDID), on the relative contribution of hormonal vs. nonhormonal variables.
Women with HSDD (N = 58, mean age 52.5) or SDID (N = 52, mean age 50.9) participated in a biopsychosocial assessment in which six nonhormonal domains were evaluated for the degree of involvement in the current low desire complaints. Participants provided a serum sample of hormones analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry.
Logistic regression was used to assess the ability of variables (nonhormonal: history of sexual abuse, developmental history, psychosexual history, psychiatric status, medical history, and sexual/relationship-related factors; hormonal: dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA], 5-diol, 4-dione, testosterone, 5-α-dihydrotestosterone, androsterone glucuronide, 3α-diol-3G, 3α-diol-17G, and DHEA-S; and demographic: age, relationship length) to predict group membership.
Women with SDID had significantly lower sexual desire and arousal scores, but the groups did not differ on relationship satisfaction or mood. Addition of the hormonal variables to the two demographic variables (age, relationship length) did not significantly increase predictive capability. However, the addition of the six nonhormonal variables to these two sets of predictors significantly increased ability to predict group status. Developmental history, psychiatric history, and psychosexual history added significantly to the predictive capability provided by the basic model when examined individually.
Nonhormonal variables added significant predictive capability to the basic model, highlighting the importance of their assessment clinically where women commonly have SDID in addition to HSDD, and emphasizing the importance of addressing psychological factors in treatment.

Download full-text


Available from: Lori Brotto, Apr 11, 2014
104 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sexual desire is typically higher in men than in women, with testosterone (T) thought to account for this difference as well as within-sex variation in desire in both women and men. However, few studies have incorporated both hormonal and social or psychological factors in studies of sexual desire. The present study addressed how three psychological domains (sexual-relational, stress-mood, body-embodiment) were related to links between T and sexual desire in healthy adults and whether dyadic and solitary desire showed associations with T. Participants (n = 196) were recruited as part of the Partnering, Physiology, and Health study, which had 105 men and 91 women who completed questionnaires and provided saliva for cortisol and T assays. T was positively linked to solitary desire in women, with masturbation frequency influencing this link. In contrast, T was negatively correlated with dyadic desire in women, but only when cortisol and perceived social stress were controlled. Replicating past findings, no significant correlations between T and desire in men were apparent, but these analyses showed that the null association remained even when psychological and confound variables were controlled. Men showed higher desire than women, but masturbation frequency rather than T influenced this difference. Results were discussed in terms of challenges to assumptions of clear links between T and desire, gendered approaches to T, and the unitarity of desire.
    Archives of Sexual Behavior 05/2012; 41(6). DOI:10.1007/s10508-012-9946-2 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction. Combining female sexual desire and arousal disorders is proposed for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Brotto et al. challenged our findings that the proposed criteria could potentially exclude from diagnosis or treatment a large number of women with distressing loss of function or in sexual desire, because (i) our samples were insufficiently severe; (ii) we sought to retain the current diagnostic criteria, whereas they contend that “the bar should be raised”; and (iii) the current sexual function diagnostic criteria are unreliable. Aim. Here we provide additional data to support our view suggesting that the proposed criteria would potentially exclude large numbers of women from diagnosis or treatment if they have moderate-to-marked (rather than severe) hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), or HSDD with incomplete loss of receptivity. Methods. In nontreatment validation studies of 481 women in North America and Europe, 231 women diagnosed with HSDD only were compared to women with no female sexual desire. Main Outcome Measures. Clinicians experienced in sexual medicine determined the severity of HSDD using the standard Clinical Global Impression of Severity. Rating scale data were also used, including the clinician-rated Sexual Desire and Interest Inventory-Female and the self-rated Female Sexual Function Index, Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire, Female Sexual Distress Scale, and an e-Diary about desire during sexual events. Results. The severity of the HSDD was rated by clinicians as generally moderate-to-marked, not mild. The women with HSDD scored as manifestly sexually dysfunctional and significantly sexually distressed, and reported markedly fewer satisfying sexual events compared to age-matched, non-dysfunctional controls, even for those with moderate or milder degrees of severity, providing compelling evidence that our sample of women with HSDD had clinically disordered sexual function. Yet the proposed criteria would apparently allow diagnosis (and therefore treatment) of only severe desire dysfunction. Conclusion. It would be counterproductive to combine the two disorders, to make individual criteria for the disorders more stringent or to require more such criteria for a diagnosis because such disorders tend to be distinct in presentation, in treatability with currently available therapies, and in logical approaches to be tested to improve therapy. Clayton AH, DeRogatis LR, Rosen RC, and Pyke R. Intended or unintended consequences? The likely implications of raising the bar for sexual dysfunction diagnosis in the proposed DSM-V revisions: 1. For women with incomplete loss of desire or sexual receptivity. J Sex Med 2012;9:2027–2039.
    Journal of Sexual Medicine 07/2012; 9(8). DOI:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02850.x · 3.15 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Sexual Medicine 11/2012; 9(11):2733-5. DOI:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02991.x · 3.15 Impact Factor
Show more