Epidemiology of post-traumatic limb amputation: a National Trauma Databank analysis.

Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
The American surgeon (Impact Factor: 0.92). 11/2010; 76(11):1214-22.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to examine the epidemiology and outcomes of posttraumatic upper (UEA) and lower extremity amputations (LEA). The National Trauma Databank version 5 was used to identify all posttraumatic amputations. From 2000 to 2004 there were 8910 amputated patients (1.0% of all trauma patients). Of these, 6855 (76.9%) had digit and 2055 (23.1%) had limb amputation. Of those with limb amputation, 92.7 per cent (1904/2055) had a single limb amputation. LEA were more frequent than UEA among patients in the single limb amputation group (58.9% vs 41.1%). The mechanism of injury was blunt in 83 per cent; most commonly after motor vehicle collisions (51.0%), followed by machinery accidents (19.4%). Motor vehicle collision occupants had more UEA (54.5% vs 45.5%, P < 0.001), whereas motorcyclists (86.2% vs 13.8%, P < 0.001) and pedestrians (91.9% vs 8.1%, P < 0.001) had more LEA. Patients with LEA were more likely to require discharge to a skilled nursing facility; whereas those with UEA were more likely to be discharged home. Traumatic limb amputation is not uncommon after trauma in the civilian population and is associated with significant morbidity. Although single limb amputation did not impact mortality, the need for multiple limb amputation was an independent risk factor for death.


Available from: Galinos Barmparas, May 30, 2015
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The treatment of patients with traumatic macroamputations is challenging. Aim of this study is to analyze the significance of this type of injury in TraumaRegister DGU (TR-DGU) and to depict the rate of formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation, epidemiologic data as well as outcome in severely injured patients with amputations. We acquired data from the TR-DGU of the German Trauma Society (DGU). The inclusion criteria for our study were ISS > 9, macroamputation and available data about the according abbreviated injury scale code.48,908 of 67,425 patients had an ISS > 9 and available data about the according abbreviated injury scale code (AIS). In total, n = 926 of 48,908 patients (1.9%) had an immediate traumatic macroamputation on-scene. Thereof, 298 patients (32.2%) had an marcoamputation of the arms, 605 patients (65.3%) an amputation of the legs and 23 patients (2.5%) had both. 457 patients (49.4%) with a macroamputation had monotrauma. In total, 126 patients (13.6%) received replantation and 800 patients (86.4%) underwent formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation.76 of 321 patients (23.7%) with upper extremity amputations and 53 of 628 patients (8.4%) with lower extremity amputations received replantation. Mortality in patients with replantation was lower (5.6% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001). Standardized mortality rate (SMR) was lower for patients with replantation (0.71, 95%CI 0.20-1.21 vs. 0.94, 95%CI 0.80-1.10, p=0.26). Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was significantly better for patients with replantation (34.0%, GOS 5) as compared to patients without replantation (20.7%, GOS 5, p < 0.001). In borderline patients (defined according to the orthopedic damage control principles), 91.5% received formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation and 8.5% replantation. The rate of formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation is higher when principles of damage control surgery are applied. The replantation rate in the upper extremity is higher than in the lower extremity. The less ISS and base excess and the higher blood pressure, hemoglobin value and thromboplastin time are the safer the decision for replantation seems to be.
    Shock (Augusta, Ga.) 11/2014; 43(3). DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000000292 · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has been estimated that more than 1.6 million individuals in the United States have undergone at least one amputation. The literature abounds with research of the classifications of such injuries, their etiologies, epidemiologies, treatment regimens, average age of onset (average age of amputation), and much more. The subpopulation that is often overlooked in these evaluations, however, is comprised of individuals who have suffered multiple limb loss. The challenges faced by those with single-limb loss are amplified for those with multiple limb loss. Pain, lifestyle adjustment, and quality of life return are just a few key areas of concern in this population. Along with amputations resulting from trauma, many individuals with multiple amputations have endured them as a result of dysvascular disease. Over recent years, amputations as a result of dysvascular disease have risen to comprise more than 80 % of new amputations occurring in the United States every year. This compares to just 54 % of total current prevalence. Those with diabetes comorbid with dysvascular disease make up 74 % of those with dysvascular amputations, and these individuals with diabetes comorbid with dysvascular disease have a 55 % chance of enduring an amputation of their contralateral limb within 2-3 years of their initial amputation. With the well-documented aging of the nation's population and the similarly skyrocketing prevalence of dysvascular disease and diabetes, it can be expected that the number of individuals with multiple limb loss will continue to increase in the United States. This article outlines the recommended measures of care for this particular subpopulation, including pain management, behavioral health considerations, strategies for rehabilitation for various levels and variations of multiple limb loss, and the assistive technology and adaptive equipment that might be available for these individuals to best enable them to continue healthy, fulfilling lives following amputation.
    12/2014; 2(4):273-289. DOI:10.1007/s40141-014-0067-9
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Emergency treatment of major sub-/total traumatic amputations continue to represent a clinical challenge due to high infection rates and serious handicaps. Effective treatment is based on two columns: surgery and antimicrobial therapy. Detailed identification of pathogen spectrum and epidemiology associated with these injuries is of tremendous importance as it guides the initial empiric antibiotic regimen and prevents adverse septic effents.
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery 01/2014; 9(1):55. DOI:10.1186/1749-7922-9-55 · 1.06 Impact Factor