Article

Inside the black box: measuring addiction treatment services and their relation to outcomes.

Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.
Journal of psychoactive drugs (Impact Factor: 1.1). 09/2010; Suppl 6:269-76. DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2010.10400550
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The adoption of performance-based management has been under consideration by addiction treatment funding agencies, and, recently, many state and county agencies have developed performance-based measurement/management systems in an attempt to improve their treatment system. This article describes one such effort in Los Angeles County, California. The Performance-Based Pilot Project linked treatment encounters (counseling sessions, drug testing, case management, and methadone dosing) with client outcomes (abstinence or reduced drug use at discharge) and longer lengths of stay in treatment. Eleven outpatient counseling programs and three narcotic treatment programs participated in the nine-month project. Results indicated that for both outpatient counseling and narcotic treatment programs, more sessions attended in the first 30 days was associated with better client outcomes and longer lengths of stay. Furthermore, in outpatient counseling programs, more group sessions during the first 30 days predicted abstinence or greater reductions in primary drug use; in narcotic treatment programs, more doses received during the first 30 days was correlated to longer treatment retention. This research implies that increasing the availability of counseling sessions for a client's first 30 days and engaging clients early is a promising area for program efforts to improve treatment outcomes and program performance.

0 Followers
 · 
93 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resumen: Se describen los resultados y el perfil psicosocial de las personas atendidas durante los últimos 3 años en un programa de rehabilitación en drogodependencias del Proyecto Hombre en Málaga. La muestra seleccio-nada ha sido de 96 personas entre 18 y 56 años (M=31.31, DT=14.20), el 83.3% hombres y 16.7% mujeres. El porcentaje de altas terapéuticas se sit-úa en el 22.9%. Se han estudiado las diversas características psicosociales, relacionándolas con la probabilidad de alta, abandono o recaída en adiccio-nes. Se detallan los resultados y análisis estadísticos en torno a característi-cas personales, familiares y de consumo. Se ha encontrado como factor fundamental relacionado con los abandonos: el policonsumo, el abuso emocional y físico, y especialmente la cantidad de conflictos familiares. Se sugieren orientaciones terapéuticas que mejoren los resultados y resuelvan los conflictos familiares que podrían ser un factor importante en las recaí-das y abandonos del programa. Palabras clave: Drogodependencia; valoración de programas; proyecto hombre; perfil psicosocial. Title: Evaluation results and psychosocial profile of a rehabilitation pro-gram for people with drug abuse. Abstract: This research group carried out an evaluation of data collected over the last 3 years, from the drug addiction rehabilitation program Pro-yecto Hombre Málaga. The sample consisted of 96 participants from 18 to 56 years old (M=31.31, DT=14.20), i.e., 83.3% male and 16.7% female. The rate of success, those who finished the therapeutic program success-fully, was 22.9%. The various psychosocial characteristics were studied, and related to the likelihood of therapeutic success, dropouts and relapse back into addiction. Details of the results and statistical analysis of the personal characteristics, family and consumer products are shown. The principal fac-tors related to dropouts were found to be: poly-drug use, physical and emotional abuse and especially, frequent family conflicts. Therapeutic guidelines are suggested which improve the overall results and help resolve family conflicts that could be an important factor for relapse and for drop-ping out of the program.
    Anales de Psicología 01/2013; 29(1):38-47. DOI:10.6018/analesps.29.1.159131 · 0.55 Impact Factor