Multisite investigation of traumatic brain injuries, posttraumatic stress disorder, and self-reported health and cognitive impairments.

Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, 98104, USA.
Archives of general psychiatry (Impact Factor: 12.26). 12/2010; 67(12):1291-300. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.158
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Few large-scale, multisite investigations have assessed the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and health outcomes across the spectrum of patients with mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
To understand the risk of developing PTSD symptoms and to assess the impact of PTSD on the development of health and cognitive impairments across the full spectrum of TBI severity.
Multisite US prospective cohort study.
Eighteen level I trauma centers and 51 non-trauma center hospitals.
A total of 3047 (weighted n = 10 372) survivors of multiple traumatic injuries between the ages of 18 and 84 years.
Severity of TBI was categorized from chart-abstracted International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Symptoms consistent with a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD were assessed with the PTSD Checklist 12 months after injury. Self-reported outcome assessment included the 8 Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey health status domains and a 4-item assessment of cognitive function at telephone interviews 3 and 12 months after injury.
At the time of injury hospitalization, 20.5% of patients had severe TBI, 11.7% moderate TBI, 12.9% mild TBI, and 54.9% no TBI. Patients with severe (relative risk, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.90) and moderate (0.63; 0.44-0.89) TBI, but not mild TBI (0.83; 0.61-1.13), demonstrated a significantly diminished risk of PTSD symptoms relative to patients without TBI. Across TBI categories, in adjusted analyses patients with PTSD demonstrated an increased risk of health status and cognitive impairments when compared with patients without PTSD.
More severe TBI was associated with a diminished risk of PTSD. Regardless of TBI severity, injured patients with PTSD demonstrated the greatest impairments in self-reported health and cognitive function. Treatment programs for patients with the full spectrum of TBI severity should integrate intervention approaches targeting PTSD.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Primary objective: To evaluate longitudinal trajectories of emotional distress symptoms after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Research design: Longitudinal study. Methods and procedures: Patients with mild-to-severe TBI, 118 patients participated at 3 months, 109 attended at 1-year and 89 attended the 5-year follow-up. Emotional distress was measured with the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Patients were also assessed for coping style, anxiety, depression, substance abuse and trauma severity. Main outcomes and results: Based on growth mixture modelling, four trajectories of emotional distress symptoms were identified: 73.5% of patients were characterized by a pattern of resilience, 6.8% by a pattern of delayed distress, 14.6% by recovery and 5.1% by chronic distress. Relative to the resilience trajectory, avoidant-coping style and psychiatric problems were related to recovery and chronic trajectories. The delayed trajectory was similar to the resilience trajectory, except for elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms at 1- and 5-years. Demographics and injury-related variables were not significantly associated with emotional distress trajectories. Conclusions: Resilience was the most common trajectory following TBI. Patients characterized by recovery and chronic trajectories required attention and long-term clinical monitoring of their symptoms. Future research would benefit from longitudinal studies to analyse emotional distress symptoms and the strength of resilience over time.
    Brain Injury 07/2014; · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) sustained in combat frequently co-occur with significant bodily injuries. Intuitively, more extensive bodily injuries might be associated with increased symptom reporting. However, French (2010) demonstrated an inverse relation between bodily injury severity and symptom reporting. This study expands on that work by examining the influence of location and severity of bodily injuries on symptom reporting following mild TBI. Participants were 579 US military service members who sustained an uncomplicated mild TBI with concurrent bodily injuries who were evaluated at two military medical centers. Bodily injury severity was quantified using a modified Injury Severity Score (ISSmod). Participants completed the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-C), on average, 2.5 months post-injury. There was a significant negative association between ISSmod scores and NSI (r =-.267, p<.001) and PCL-C (r =-.273, p<.001) total scores. Using linear regression to examine the relation between symptom reporting and injury severity across the six ISS body regions, three body regions were significant predictors of the NSI total score (Face; p<.001; Abdomen; p=.003; Extremities; p<.001) and accounted for 9.3% of the variance (p<.001). For the PCL-C, two body regions were significant predictors of the PCL-C total score (Face; p<.001; Extremities; p<.001) and accounted for 10.5% of the variance. There was an inverse relation between bodily injury severity and symptom reporting in this sample. Hypothesized explanations include underreporting of symptoms, increased peer support, disruption of fear conditioning due to acute morphine use, or delayed expression of symptoms.
    Journal of neurotrauma 05/2014; · 4.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Whilst it has been well-demonstrated that traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in long-term cognitive, behavioural and emotional difficulties, less is understood about how these outcomes differ from those following traumatic orthopaedic injury (TOI). The aim of this study was to compare self-reported outcomes at 5-10 years post-injury for those with TBI, TOI, and uninjured controls. It was hypothesised that participants with TBI would have greater cognitive difficulties; participants with TOI and TBI would have similar functional and physical outcomes, both being poorer than controls; and participants with TBI would have poorer psychosocial outcomes than those with TOI. Participants and Methods Eighty-eight individuals with complicated mild to severe TBI and 96 with TOI recruited during inpatient rehabilitation were followed up 5-10 years post-injury, together with 48 controls followed over a similar period. Self-report measures of global functioning (GOS-E), quality of life (SF-36), psychological wellbeing (SCL-90-R, HADS, PCL-S), psychosocial difficulties (SIP), cognitive difficulties (SF-36 COG), pain (BPI), and fatigue (FSS) were administered. Results Outcomes for individuals with TBI and TOI differed significantly from controls, with poorer global functioning, and greater psychological distress and interference from pain. Only participants with TBI reported greater cognitive difficulties and anxiety than controls, and were less likely to be employed or in a relationship. Participants with TBI reported greater anxiety, PTSD, psychological distress and psychosocial difficulties than those with TOI. Conclusions Both TOI and TBI cause long-term disability, interference from pain, and psychological distress. However, cognitive impairments, unemployment, lack of long-term relationships, anxiety and PTSD are more substantial long-term problems following TBI. Findings from this study have implications for managing risks associated with these injury groups and tailoring rehabilitation to improve long-term outcomes.
    Injury 01/2014; · 2.46 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Dec 29, 2014