Comparative studies evaluating mouse models used for efficacy testing of experimental drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (Impact Factor: 4.45). 12/2010; 55(3):1237-47. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00595-10
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Methodologies for preclinical animal model testing of drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis vary from laboratory to laboratory; however, it is unknown if these variations result in different outcomes. Thus, a series of head-to-head comparisons of drug regimens in three commonly used mouse models (intravenous, a low-dose aerosol, and a high-dose aerosol infection model) and in two strains of mice are reported here. Treatment with standard tuberculosis (TB) drugs resulted in similar efficacies in two mouse species after a low-dose aerosol infection. When comparing the three different infection models, the efficacies in mice of rifampin and pyrazinamide were similar when administered with either isoniazid or moxifloxacin. Relapse studies revealed that the standard drug regimen showed a significantly higher relapse rate than the moxifloxacin-containing regimen. In fact, 4 months of the moxifloxacin-containing combination regimen showed similar relapse rates as 6 months of the standard regimen. The intravenous model showed slower bactericidal killing kinetics with the combination regimens tested and a higher relapse of infection than either aerosol infection models. All three models showed similar outcomes for in vivo efficacy and relapse of infection for the drug combinations tested, regardless of the mouse infection model used. Efficacy data for the drug combinations used also showed similar results, regardless of the formulation used for rifampin or timing of the drugs administered in combination. In all three infection models, the dual combination of rifampin and pyrazinamide was less sterilizing than the standard three-drug regimen, and therefore the results do not support the previously reported antagonism between standard TB agents.

Download full-text


Available from: Charles A Peloquin, Nov 05, 2014
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To truly transform the landscape of tuberculosis treatment, novel regimens containing at least 2 new drugs are needed to simplify the treatment of both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant forms of tuberculosis. As part of an ongoing effort to evaluate novel drug combinations for treatment-shortening potential in a murine model, we performed two long-term, relapse-based experiments. In the first experiment, TMC207 plus pyrazinamide, alone or in combination with any third drug, proved superior to the first-line regimen including rifampin, pyrazinamide, and isoniazid. On the basis of CFU counts at 1 month, clofazimine proved to be the best third drug combined with TMC207 and pyrazinamide, whereas the addition of PA-824 was modestly antagonistic. Relapse results were inconclusive due to the low rate of relapse in all test groups. In the second experiment evaluating 3-drug combinations composed of TMC207, pyrazinamide, PA-824, moxifloxacin, and rifapentine, TMC207 plus pyrazinamide plus either rifapentine or moxifloxacin was the most effective, curing 100% and 67% of the mice treated, respectively, in 2 months of treatment. Four months of the first-line regimen did not cure any mice, whereas the combination of TMC207, PA-824, and moxifloxacin cured 50% of the mice treated. The results reveal new building blocks for novel regimens with the potential to shorten the duration of treatment for both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant tuberculosis, including the combination of TMC207, pyrazinamide, PA-824, and a potent fluoroquinolone.
    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 09/2011; 55(12):5485-92. DOI:10.1128/AAC.05293-11 · 4.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the search for new anti-tuberculosis drugs, numerous potential drugs are being screened in vitro. In animal models, promising new anti-tuberculosis drugs are assessed in terms of toxic side effects and comparative therapeutic efficacy. Mice are frequently used and experimental infections are established in different ways. To investigate to what extent the route of Mycobacterium tuberculosis inoculation is a determinant in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis (TB) and the therapeutic outcome. Results will contribute to insight into the translational value of TB models used for preclinical studies. TB in mice was established through intratracheal or intravenous mycobacterial inoculation. The efficacy of a 26-week treatment regimen was evaluated, including assessment of relapse of infection 13 weeks post-treatment. It was shown that the course of TB and the therapeutic response, in terms of histopathological characteristics and mycobacterial load, in lungs and extra- pulmonary organs is substantially different and dependent on the route of infection applied and the inoculum size used. When evaluating the comparative therapeutic potential of novel anti-tuberculosis drugs or drug treatment schedules investigated in different studies, it should be noted that the route of infection applied and the inoculum size used influence the course of murine TB and the therapeutic response to the standard first- line anti-tuberculosis drug regimen.
    The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 11/2011; 15(11):1478-84, i. DOI:10.5588/ijtld.11.0012 · 2.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In preclinical testing of antituberculosis drugs, laboratory-adapted strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are usually used both for in vitro and in vivo studies. However, it is unknown whether the heterogeneity of M. tuberculosis stocks used by various laboratories can result in different outcomes in tests of antituberculosis drug regimens in animal infection models. In head-to-head studies, we investigated whether bactericidal efficacy results in BALB/c mice infected by inhalation with the laboratory-adapted strains H37Rv and Erdman differ from each other and from those obtained with clinical tuberculosis strains. Treatment of mice consisted of dual and triple drug combinations of isoniazid (H), rifampin (R), and pyrazinamide (Z). The results showed that not all strains gave the same in vivo efficacy results for the drug combinations tested. Moreover, the ranking of HRZ and RZ efficacy results was not the same for the two H37Rv strains evaluated. The magnitude of this strain difference also varied between experiments, emphasizing the risk of drawing firm conclusions for human trials based on single animal studies. The results also confirmed that the antagonism seen within the standard HRZ regimen by some investigators appears to be an M. tuberculosis strain-specific phenomenon. In conclusion, the specific identity of M. tuberculosis strain used was found to be an important variable that can change the apparent outcome of in vivo efficacy studies in mice. We highly recommend confirmation of efficacy results in late preclinical testing against a different M. tuberculosis strain than the one used in the initial mouse efficacy study, thereby increasing confidence to advance potent drug regimens to clinical trials.
    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 12/2011; 56(2):731-8. DOI:10.1128/AAC.05701-11 · 4.45 Impact Factor