Differences Between Integrated And Stand-Alone E-Prescribing Systems Have Implications For Future Use

Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Partners Healthcare, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.97). 12/2010; 29(12):2268-77. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0557
Source: PubMed


Understanding the benefits of electronic prescribing systems has important implications for quality and efficiency in medical care. We surveyed physicians about their use of e-prescribing in outpatient practices. We found that physicians who use e-prescribing systems integrated into an electronic health record have different characteristics, usage patterns, perceived benefits, and levels of satisfaction than physicians who use stand-alone systems. For example, although only 56 percent of the physicians we surveyed said that they checked a patient's drug history most or all of the time when writing a prescription, those with integrated systems were significantly more likely to report doing so than their counterparts with stand-alone systems. Our findings have implications for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act's requirements for e-prescribing and the future use of this technology. Because many stand-alone systems cannot meet meaningful-use requirements, there is likely to be a shift toward integrated systems.

Download full-text


Available from: Corey M Angst, Sep 22, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health policy forces are promoting the adoption of interoperable electronic health records (EHRs) with electronic prescribing (e-prescribing). Despite the promise of EHRs with e-prescribing to improve medication safety in ambulatory care settings--where most prescribing occurs and where errors are common--few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness. A study was conducted to assess the effect of an e-prescribing system with clinical decision support, including checks for drug allergies and drug-drug interactions, that was integrated within an EHR on rates of ambulatory prescribing errors. In a prospective study using a nonrandomized, pre-post design with concurrent controls, 6 providers who used a commercial e-prescribing system were compared with 15 providers who remained paper-based from September 2005 through July 2008. Prescribing errors were identified by a standardized prescription and chart review. Some 2,432 paper prescriptions at baseline and 2,079 prescriptions at one year were analyzed. Error rates for e-prescribing adopters decreased 1.5-fold--from 26.0 errors per 100 prescriptions at baseline (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.4-38.9) to 16.0 errors per 100 prescriptions at one year (95% CI, 12.7-20.2; p = .09). Error rates remained unchanged for nonadopters (37.3 per 100 prescriptions at baseline, 95% CI, 27.6-50.2, versus 38.4 per 100 prescriptions at one year, 95% CI 27.4-53.9; p = .54). Error rates for e-prescribing adopters were significantly lower than for nonadopters at one year (p < .001). Illegibility errors were high at baseline and eliminated by e-prescribing. The preliminary findings from this small group of providers suggest that e-prescribing systems may decrease ambulatory prescribing errors, which are occurring at high rates among community-based providers.
    Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 10/2011; 37(10):470-8.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: E-prescribing systems enable electronic transmissions of prescriptions to pharmacies from the provider's office. The promise of e-prescribing in regard to patient safety is reduction in the time gap between point of care and point of service, reduction in medication errors, and improved quality of care. This article will give a brief overview of e-prescribing systems, what is known about these systems and their impact on patient safety, and what challenges remain. For purposes of this article, the term "patient safety" will be used interchangeably with medication errors and adverse drug events. Although there is some evidence that e-prescribing alone and e-prescribing with medication decision support can reduce medication errors, there is also evidence that e-prescribing can be a source of medication errors. The need for more study is particularly relevant and timely, as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is strongly incentivizing providers to use e-prescribing with medication decision support. Despite concerns about efficiency and dissatisfaction, the majority of providers believe e-prescribing provides for improved patient safety. Limited evidence suggests that e-prescribing with medication decision support can improve patient safety.
    Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine 11/2011; 78(6):827-33. DOI:10.1002/msj.20298 · 1.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A core feature of e-prescribing is the electronic exchange of prescription data between physician practices and pharmacies, which can potentially improve the efficiency of the prescribing process and reduce medication errors. Barriers to implementing this feature exist, but they are not well understood. This study's objectives were to explore recent physician practice and pharmacy experiences with electronic transmission of new prescriptions and renewals, and identify facilitators of and barriers to effective electronic transmission and pharmacy e-prescription processing. Qualitative analysis of 114 telephone interviews conducted with representatives from 97 organizations between February and September 2010, including 24 physician practices, 48 community pharmacies, and three mail-order pharmacies actively transmitting or receiving e-prescriptions via Surescripts. Practices and pharmacies generally were satisfied with electronic transmission of new prescriptions but reported that the electronic renewal process was used inconsistently, resulting in inefficient workarounds for both parties. Practice communications with mail-order pharmacies were less likely to be electronic than with community pharmacies because of underlying transmission network and computer system limitations. While e-prescribing reduced manual prescription entry, pharmacy staff frequently had to complete or edit certain fields, particularly drug name and patient instructions. Electronic transmission of new prescriptions has matured. Changes in technical standards and system design and more targeted physician and pharmacy training may be needed to address barriers to e-renewals, mail-order pharmacy connectivity, and pharmacy processing of e-prescriptions.
    Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 11/2011; 19(3):353-9. DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000515 · 3.50 Impact Factor
Show more