Article

Trends in Quality of Care and Barriers to Improvement in the Indian Health Service

Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 12/2010; 26(5):480-6. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1594-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although Native Americans experience substantial disparities in health outcomes, little information is available regarding healthcare delivery for this population.
To analyze trends in ambulatory quality of care and physician reports of barriers to quality improvement within the Indian Health Service (IHS).
Longitudinal analysis of clinical performance from 2002 to 2006 within the IHS, and a physician survey in 2007.
Adult patients cared for within the IHS and 740 federally employed physicians within the IHS.
Clinical performance for 12 measures of ambulatory care within the IHS; as well as physician reports of ability to access needed health services and use of quality improvement strategies. We examined the correlation between physician reports of access to mammography and clinical performance of breast cancer screening. A similar correlation was analyzed for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Clinical performance significantly improved for 10 of the 12 measures from 2002 to 2006, including adult immunizations, cholesterol testing, and measures of blood pressure and cholesterol control for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Breast cancer screening rates decreased (44% to 40%, p = 0.002), while screening rates for diabetic retinopathy remained constant (51%). Fewer than half of responding primary care physicians reported adequate access to high-quality specialists (29%), non-emergency hospital admission (37%), high-quality imaging services (32%), and high-quality outpatient mental health services (16%). Breast cancer screening rates were higher at sites with higher rates of physicians reporting routine access to mammography compared to sites with lower rates of physicians reporting such access (46% vs. 35%, ρ = 0.27, p = 0.04). Most physicians reported using patient registries and decision support tools to improve patient care.
Quality of care has improved within the IHS for many services, however performance in specific areas may be limited by access to essential resources.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Shimon Aaron Shaykevich, Apr 07, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
144 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) women have relatively high breast cancer mortality rates despite the availability of free or low-cost screening. This qualitative study explored issues that influence the participation of older AIAN women in mammography screening through tribally directed National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Programs (NBCCEDPs). We interviewed staff (n = 12) representing five tribal NBCCEDPs and conducted four focus groups with AIAN women ages 50 to 80 years (n = 33). Our analysis identified four main areas of factors that predispose, enable, or reinforce decisions around mammography: financial issues and personal investments, program characteristics including direct services and education, access issues such as transportation, and comfort zone topics that include cultural or community-wide norms regarding cancer prevention. This study has implications for nurse education and training on delivering effective mammography services and preventive cancer outreach and education programs in AIAN communities.
    Journal of Transcultural Nursing 03/2014; 26(2). DOI:10.1177/1043659614523994
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the factors associated with cancer screening adherence among Native Americans living in California. 2,266 Native Americans identified from the California Health Interview Surveys during 2001, 2003, and 2005 eligible for cervical, breast, or colorectal cancer screening. We fit multivariable logistic regression models to identify demographic and healthcare access predictors of adherence to cancer screening. The presence of a recent physician visit was significantly associated with cervical (odds ratio [OR] 7.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.27, 12.6), breast (OR 3.29, 95% CI 2.0, 5.42), and colorectal (OR 3.02, 95% Cl 1.74, 5.23) cancer screening adherence. The report of a usual source of care was similarly positively associated with cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening adherence. Additional predictors for colorectal cancer screening included higher educational attainment (OR 1.56, 95% Cl 1.07, 2.28), and the presence of a comorbid condition (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16, 2.05). Experiencing discrimination (OR .42, 95% Cl .20, .89) and never being married (OR .49, 95% CI .27, .89) were negative predictors of breast cancer screening, while having insurance (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.27, 3.15) was a positive predictor. Cervical cancer screening was positively associated with living at or above 300% of the federal poverty level (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.50, 4.85). Regular access to health care and a physician are the most consistent predictors of cancer screening adherence among Native Americans and should represent a focus of activities to improve screening rates in these communities.
    Ethnicity & disease 01/2011; 21(2):202-9.
  • New England Journal of Medicine 06/2011; 364(23):2258-9. DOI:10.1056/NEJMe1103390