Transcription of functionally related constitutive genes is not coordinated

Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (Impact Factor: 13.31). 01/2011; 18(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1934
Source: PubMed


Expression of an individual gene can vary considerably among genetically identical cells because of stochastic fluctuations in transcription. However, proteins comprising essential complexes or pathways have similar abundances and lower variability. It is not known whether coordination in the expression of subunits of essential complexes occurs at the level of transcription, mRNA abundance or protein expression. To directly measure the level of coordination in the expression of genes, we used highly sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to count individual mRNAs of functionally related and unrelated genes within single Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Our results revealed that transcript levels of temporally induced genes are highly correlated in individual cells. In contrast, transcription of constitutive genes encoding essential subunits of complexes is not coordinated because of stochastic fluctuations. The coordination of these functional complexes therefore must occur post-transcriptionally, and likely post-translationally.

Download full-text


Available from: Timothee Lionnet, Oct 05, 2015
21 Reads
  • Source
    • "Conversely , at category II promoters, where Rap1 binds much closer to Fhl1 and Hmo1 is not present, we propose that Rap1 interacts directly with Fhl1 and/or Ifh1, consistent with recently reported in vitro binding studies (Mallick and Whiteway 2013). Rap1 may also support Fhl1/Ifh1 and Hmo1 binding through a still poorly understood ability to exclude nucleosomes in its vicinity (Gandhi et al. 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In yeast, ribosome production is controlled transcriptionally by tight coregulation of the 138 ribosomal protein genes (RPGs). RPG promoters display limited sequence homology, and the molecular basis for their coregulation remains largely unknown. Here we identify two prevalent RPG promoter types, both characterized by upstream binding of the general transcription factor (TF) Rap1 followed by the RPG-specific Fhl1/Ifh1 pair, with one type also binding the HMG-B protein Hmo1. We show that the regulatory properties of the two promoter types are remarkably similar, suggesting that they are determined to a large extent by Rap1 and the Fhl1/Ifh1 pair. Rapid depletion experiments allowed us to define a hierarchy of TF binding in which Rap1 acts as a pioneer factor required for binding of all other TFs. We also uncovered unexpected features underlying recruitment of Fhl1, whose forkhead DNA-binding domain is not required for binding at most promoters, and Hmo1, whose binding is supported by repeated motifs. Finally, we describe unusually micrococcal nuclease (MNase)-sensitive nucleosomes at all RPG promoters, located between the canonical +1 and -1 nucleosomes, which coincide with sites of Fhl1/Ifh1 and Hmo1 binding. We speculate that these "fragile" nucleosomes play an important role in regulating RPG transcriptional output.
    Genes & Development 08/2014; 28(15):1695-709. DOI:10.1101/gad.244434.114 · 10.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Regulated genes tend to show large variability in expression between individual cells, resulting in an asymmetric or skewed distribution curve for a given cell population [3], [4]. By contrast, genes expressed at a steady-state show lower variability which result in a Poisson distribution curve as in the case of yeast housekeeping genes that are constitutively active [5], [6]. The increased transcriptional variability associated with regulated genes compared to that of constitutively active genes is predicted to be due to infrequent but intense episodes or ‘bursts’ of transcriptional activity [6], [7]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genes are regulated at the single-cell level. Here, we performed RNA FISH of thousands of cells by flow cytometry (flow-RNA FISH) to gain insight into transcriptional variability between individual cells. These experiments utilized the murine adenocarcinoma 3134 cell line with 200 copies of the MMTV-Ras reporter integrated at a single genomic locus. The MMTV array contains approximately 800-1200 binding sites for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and 600 binding sites for the pioneer factor Foxa1. Hormone activation of endogenous GR by dexamethasone treatment resulted in highly variable changes in the RNA FISH intensity (25-300 pixel intensity units) and size (1.25-15 µm), indicative of probabilistic or stochastic mechanisms governing GR and cofactor activation of the MMTV promoter. Exogenous expression of the pioneer factor Foxa1 increased the FISH signal intensity and size as expected for a chromatin remodeler that enhances transcriptional competence through increased chromatin accessibility. In addition, specific analysis of Foxa1-enriched cell sub-populations showed that low and high Foxa1 levels substantially lowered the cell-to-cell variability in the FISH intensity as determined by a noise calculation termed the % coefficient of variation. These results suggest that an additional function of the pioneer factor Foxa1 may be to decrease transcriptional noise.
    PLoS ONE 09/2013; 8(9):e76043. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0076043 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The internal workings of the nucleus remain a mystery. A list of component parts exists, and in many cases their functional roles are known for events such as transcription, RNA processing, or nuclear export. Some of these components exhibit structural features in the nucleus, regions of concentration or bodies that have given rise to the concept of functional compartmentalization--that there are underlying organizational principles to be described. In contrast, a picture is emerging in which transcription appears to drive the assembly of the functional components required for gene expression, drawing from pools of excess factors. Unifying this seemingly dual nature requires a more rigorous approach, one in which components are tracked in time and space and correlated with onset of specific nuclear functions. In this chapter, we anticipate tools that will address these questions and provide the missing kinetics of nuclear function. These tools are based on analyzing the fluctuations inherent in the weak signals of endogenous nuclear processes and determining values for them. In this way, it will be possible eventually to provide a computational model describing the functional relationships of essential components.
    Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 01/2010; 75:113-26. DOI:10.1101/sqb.2010.75.057
Show more