Article

Transcription of functionally related constitutive genes is not coordinated.

Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (Impact Factor: 11.63). 01/2011; 18(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1934
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Expression of an individual gene can vary considerably among genetically identical cells because of stochastic fluctuations in transcription. However, proteins comprising essential complexes or pathways have similar abundances and lower variability. It is not known whether coordination in the expression of subunits of essential complexes occurs at the level of transcription, mRNA abundance or protein expression. To directly measure the level of coordination in the expression of genes, we used highly sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to count individual mRNAs of functionally related and unrelated genes within single Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Our results revealed that transcript levels of temporally induced genes are highly correlated in individual cells. In contrast, transcription of constitutive genes encoding essential subunits of complexes is not coordinated because of stochastic fluctuations. The coordination of these functional complexes therefore must occur post-transcriptionally, and likely post-translationally.

Full-text

Available from: Timothee Lionnet, Jun 10, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
171 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traditionally, gene expression measurements were performed on "bulk" samples containing populations of thousands of cells. Recent advances in genomic technology have made it possible to measure gene expression in hundreds of individual cells at a time. As a result, cellular properties that were previously masked in "bulk" measurements can now be observed directly. In this review, we will survey emerging technologies for single cell transcriptomics, and describe how they are used to study complex disease such as cancer, as well as other biological phenomena such as tissue regeneration, embryonic development, and immune response.
    Frontiers in Oncology 03/2015; 5:53. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2015.00053
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is responsible for the transcription of most eukaryotic protein-coding genes. Analysing the topological distribution and quantification of RNAPII can contribute to understanding its function in interphase nuclei. Previously it was shown that RNAPII molecules in plant nuclei form reticulate structures within euchromatin of differentiated Arabidopsis thaliana nuclei rather than being organized in distinct 'transcription factories' as observed in mammalian nuclei. Immunosignal intensity measurements based on specific antibody labelling in maximum intensity projections of image stacks acquired by structured illumination microscopy (SIM) suggested a relative proportional increase of RNAPII in endopolyploid plant nuclei. Here, photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) was applied to determine the absolute number and distribution of active and inactive RNAPII molecules in differentiated A. thaliana nuclei. The proportional increase of RNAPII during endopolyploidization is confirmed, but it is also shown that PALM measurements are more reliable than those based on SIM in terms of quantification. The single molecule localization results show that, although RNAPII molecules are globally dispersed within plant euchromatin, they also aggregate within smaller distances as described for mammalian transcription factories. © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.
    Journal of Experimental Botany 03/2015; 66(6). DOI:10.1093/jxb/erv091 · 5.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: eLife digest A single cell from a plant, an animal or another eukaryote can contain several meters of DNA. In order to fit this length inside the nucleus of the cell, the DNA is wrapped around proteins called histones to form a compact structure known as chromatin. Chromatin exists in two forms: loosely packed chromatin tends to contain the genes that are expressed in cells, whereas highly compacted chromatin (also called heterochromatin) silences the expression of most nearby genes. Adding small chemical markings to histone proteins can alter how much the chromatin is compacted, and newly formed cells can inherit these markings whenever a cell divides. This enables the new cell to essentially ‘remember’ which genes were active and which were repressed in the original cell. However, no one has measured how stable heterochromatin is over multiple cell divisions; as such it is unclear if genes that should remain silent are occasionally expressed after a cell has divided a number of times. Budding yeast is a well-established model for studying heterochromatin. The genome of this single-celled organism has distinct regions of highly compacted chromatin, which are established and maintained by a number of different proteins. Dodson and Rine have developed a new technique to detect when gene silencing is lost in individual yeast cells, even if the loss of silencing only occurs for a brief period. This approach revealed that genes in supposedly ‘silent’ heterochromatin were still expressed but only very rarely—in about 1 in every 1000 cell divisions. Dodson and Rine's findings suggest that when silencing is lost, it is promptly re-established with the aid of a protein called Sir1. In addition, the new technique revealed that Sir1 helps to prevent losses of silencing in the first place. As such, the Sir1 protein appears to have previously unappreciated roles in the maintenance and the inheritance of heterochromatin in dividing yeast cells. Dodson and Rine also discovered that a protein called Hst3—which acts to remove chemical markings from histone proteins—also helps stabilize the silenced state. With this technique in hand, it is now possible to test any molecule, environment, or cellular process for its potential effect on the stability of gene silencing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05007.002
    eLife Sciences 01/2015; 4. DOI:10.7554/eLife.05007 · 8.52 Impact Factor