The mechanism of sodium and substrate release from the binding pocket of vSGLT.

Department of Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1759, USA.
Nature (Impact Factor: 38.6). 12/2010; 468(7326):988-91. DOI: 10.1038/nature09580
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Membrane co-transport proteins that use a five-helix inverted repeat motif have recently emerged as one of the largest structural classes of secondary active transporters. However, despite many structural advances there is no clear evidence of how ion and substrate transport are coupled. Here we report a comprehensive study of the sodium/galactose transporter from Vibrio parahaemolyticus (vSGLT), consisting of molecular dynamics simulations, biochemical characterization and a new crystal structure of the inward-open conformation at a resolution of 2.7 Å. Our data show that sodium exit causes a reorientation of transmembrane helix 1 that opens an inner gate required for substrate exit, and also triggers minor rigid-body movements in two sets of transmembrane helical bundles. This cascade of events, initiated by sodium release, ensures proper timing of ion and substrate release. Once set in motion, these molecular changes weaken substrate binding to the transporter and allow galactose readily to enter the intracellular space. Additionally, we identify an allosteric pathway between the sodium-binding sites, the unwound portion of transmembrane helix 1 and the substrate-binding site that is essential in the coupling of co-transport.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sodium-Galactose Transporter (SGLT) is a secondary active symporter which accumulates sugars into cells by using the electrochemical gradient of Na+ across the membrane. Previous computational studies provided insights into the release process of the two ligands (galactose and sodium ion) into the cytoplasm from the inward-facing conformation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus sodium/galactose transporter (vSGLT). Several aspects of the transport mechanism of this symporter remain to be clarified: (i) a detailed kinetic and thermodynamic characterization of the exit path of the two ligands is still lacking; (ii) contradictory conclusions have been drawn concerning the gating role of Y263; (iii) the role of Na+ in modulating the release path of galactose is not clear. In this work, we use bias-exchange metadynamics simulations to characterize the free energy profile of the galactose and Na+ release processes toward the intracellular side. Surprisingly, we find that the exit of Na+ and galactose is non-concerted as the cooperativity between the two ligands is associated to a transition that is not rate limiting. The dissociation barriers are of the order of 11-12 kcal/mol for both the ion and the substrate, in line with kinetic information concerning this type of transporters. On the basis of these results we propose a branched six-state alternating access mechanism, which may be shared also by other members of the LeuT-fold transporters.
    PLoS Computational Biology 12/2014; 10(12):e1004017. · 4.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present the first account of the structure–function relationships of a protein of the subfamily of urea/Hþ membrane transporters of fungi and plants, using Aspergillus nidulans UreA as a study model. Based on the crystal structures of the Vibrio parahaemolyticus sodium/galactose symporter (vSGLT) and of the Nucleobase-Cation-Symport-1 benzylhydantoin transporter from Microbacterium liquefaciens (Mhp1), we constructed a three-dimensional model of UreA which, combined with site-directed and classical random mutagenesis, led to the identification of amino acids important for UreA function. Our approach allowed us to suggest roles for these residues in the binding, recognition and translocation of urea, and in the sorting of UreA to the membrane. Residues W82, Y106, A110, T133, N275, D286, Y388, Y437 and S446, located in transmembrane helixes 2, 3, 7 and 11,were found to be involved in the binding, recognition and/or translocation of urea and the sorting of UreA to the membrane. Y106, A110, T133 and Y437 seemto play a role in substrate selectivity, while S446 is necessary for proper sorting of UreA to the membrane. Other amino acids identified by random classical mutagenesis (G99, R141, A163, G168 and P639) may be important for the basic transporter’s structure, its proper folding or its correct traffic to the membrane.
    Open Biology 06/2014; 4(140070). · 3.27 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Water transport across cell membranes is central to most physiological functions. About 200 L of water move across epithelial cells each day in humans in order to maintain whole-body homeostasis; water transport in and out of organs such as the brain and eye are of major clinical importance. It is well established that the water transport is driven by ion transport, but how? Osmosis is not always the answer: water can be transported against considerable osmotic gradients, apparently without any external osmotic or hydrostatic driving forces. It is generally accepted that cotransporters of the symport type play a key role for the coupling between ion and water fluxes. Models of coupling are either molecular or based on unstirred layer effects, and can be distinguished by their response time: for molecular models, water transport follows changes of substrate transport instantaneously; in unstirred layer models there is a delay while the osmolarity changes in the solutions surrounding the cotransport protein. For cotransporters expressed heterologously in Xenopus oocytes, influx of water can be detected about 1 second after initiation of cotransport of ions and other substrates. This is 20 times faster than expected (and observed) for unstirred layer effects. Water transport in cotransporters is best explained by a molecular model in which ion and water fluxes are coupled by a mechanism within the protein. This would also clarify how cotransporters exploit the free energy in the ion fluxes for the uphill transport of water. WIREs Membr Transp Signal 2012, 1:373–381. doi: 10.1002/wmts.54 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
    Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Membrane Transport and Signaling. 07/2012; 1(4).

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014