Incorporation of Biomarker Assessment in Novel Clinical Trial Designs: Personalizing Brain Tumor Treatments

Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Current Oncology Reports (Impact Factor: 2.89). 02/2011; 13(1):42-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-010-0144-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Advances in molecular genetics have aided the identification of potential biomarkers with significant clinical promise in neurooncology. These advances and the evolution of targeted therapeutics necessitate the development and incorporation of innovative clinical trial designs that can effectively validate and assess the clinical utility of biomarkers. In this article, we review the use and potential of several such designs in neurooncology trials in order to support the development of personalized treatment approaches for brain tumor patients.

Download full-text


Available from: Susan M Chang, Sep 28, 2015
17 Reads
    • "Note that for logistic or ethical reasons, in particular in rare diseases, the retrospective use of data from already performed RCTs would also be possible. Various specific prospective study designs for predictive biomarker studies have been suggested [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43]; some with specific emphasis on determining predictive cut-points for continuously measured biomarkers [44] [45] [46]. Efficacy is the proof that a new treatment has sufficient therapeutic effect and is, among other things, necessary for marketing authorization decisions of regulatory bodies. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status has prognostic and, in the subpopulation of elderly patients, predictive value in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Therefore, knowledge of the MGMT promoter methylation status is important for clinical decision-making. So far, MGMT testing has been limited by the lack of a robust test with sufficiently high analytical performance. Recently, one of several available pyrosequencing protocols has been shown to be an accurate and robust method for MGMT testing in an intra- and interlaboratory ring trial. However, some uncertainties remain with regard to methodological issues, cut-off definitions, and optimal use in the clinical setting. In this article, we highlight and discuss several of these open questions. The main unresolved issues are the definition of the most relevant CpG sites to analyze for clinical purposes and the determination of a cut-off value for dichotomization of quantitative MGMT pyrosequencing results into "MGMT methylated" and "MGMT unmethylated" patient subgroups as a basis for further treatment decisions.
    Clinical neuropathology 09/2015; 34(5):250-257. DOI:10.5414/NP300904 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A prognostic biomarker is a tumor-specific trait that predicts clinical outcome regardless of treatment given. Conversely, a predictive biomarker predicts clinical response to a specific treatment or drug class (17). Using such biomarkers will allow personalized prognostic estimates to be given to patients with a subsequent customized treatment regime, maximizing effectiveness, and minimizing toxicity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is increasingly clear that both adult and pediatric glial tumor entities represent collections of neoplastic lesions, each with individual pathological molecular events and treatment responses. In this review, we discuss the current prognostic biomarkers validated for clinical use or with future clinical validity for gliomas. Accurate prognostication is crucial for managing patients as treatments may be associated with high morbidity and the benefits of high risk interventions must be judged by the treating clinicians. We also review biomarkers with predictive validity, which may become clinically relevant with the development of targeted therapies for adult and pediatric gliomas.
    Frontiers in Oncology 03/2014; 4:47. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2014.00047
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in the management of gliomas, including the approval of agents such as temozolomide and bevacizumab, have created an evolving therapeutic landscape in glioma treatment, thus affecting our ability to reliably use historical controls to comparatively assess the activity of new therapies. Furthermore, the increasing availability of novel, targeted agents--which are competing for a small patient population, in view of the low incidence of primary brain tumours--draws attention to the need to improve the efficiency of phase 2 clinical testing in neuro-oncology to expeditiously transition the most promising of these drugs or combinations to potentially practice-changing phase 3 trials. In this report from the Response Assessment in Neurooncology (RANO) group, we review phase 2 trial designs that can address these challenges and capitalise on scientific and clinical advances in brain tumour treatment in neuro-oncology to accelerate and optimise the selection of drugs deserving further testing in phase 3 trials. Although there is still a small role for single-arm and non-comparative phase 2 designs, emphasis is placed on the potential role that comparative randomised phase 2 designs--such as screening designs, selection designs, discontinuation designs, and adaptive designs, including seamless phase 2/3 designs--can have. The rational incorporation of these designs, as determined by the specific clinical setting and the trial's endpoints or goals, has the potential to substantially advance new drug development in neuro-oncology.
    The Lancet Oncology 05/2012; 13(5):e196-204. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70406-5 · 24.69 Impact Factor
Show more