Article

Microsurgery Trainer with Quantitative Feedback: A Novel Training Tool for Microvascular Anastomosis and Suggested Training Exercise

Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.33). 12/2010; 126(6):328e-330e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f6402d
Source: PubMed
0 Followers
 · 
61 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A técnica de anastomose microcirúrgica é desafiadora e requer treinamento extenso, dedicação e tempo. Os autores descrevem um modelo de treinamento acessível, prático e fácil, que utiliza retalho abdominal proveniente de abdominoplastias. O calibre dos vasos epigástricos superficiais encontrados nos retalhos abdominais excisados variou de 1,2 mm a 2 mm, dependendo do índice de massa corporal da paciente no pré-operatório. Esse retalho permitiu o treinamento de anastomoses microcirúrgicas em vasos de diferentes calibres. Esses vasos permaneciam com pequena quantidade de sangue em seu lúmen, o que permitia testar a qualidade e a patência das anastomoses. Esse modelo de treinamento em vasos abdominais humanos, quando comparado aos modelos animais ou inanimados, permite transição mais rápida e real aos pacientes. A prática de dissecção e de anastomoses terminoterminais e terminolaterais de uma maneira efetiva e prática aperfeiçoa a destreza cirúrgica.
    06/2012; 27(2):325-327. DOI:10.1590/S1983-51752012000200026
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The volume-outcome relationship has not been specifically measured for U.S. autologous breast reconstruction. The authors studied whether there is a relationship between hospital procedural volume and perioperative complication rates. The authors identified (1) patients who underwent total mastectomy with immediate autologous reconstruction from 1998 to 2010 and (2) a subset of microsurgical cases from 2008 to 2010. Hospitals were categorized into quartiles based on number of yearly procedures. Outcomes included surgery-specific and systemic complications. A multivariable model was used to analyze the volume-outcome relationship after adjusting for other variables. Over the 13-year study period, 21,016 immediate autologous reconstructions were recorded. Surgery-specific and systemic complication rates were 13.0 and 7.5 percent, respectively. Ninety-two percent of centers perform a very low (fewer than nine cases per year) or low (nine to 20 cases per year) number of procedures. The highest-volume centers (>44 cases per year) are located in metropolitan areas. An inverse relationship between reconstructive volume and surgery-specific and systemic complications was identified (p < 0.01). In the multivariable analysis, centers with very low, low, and medium case volumes were more likely to have surgery-specific complications than high-volume centers (p < 0.01). Very-low-volume compared with high-volume centers were more likely to have systemic complications (p < 0.01). Higher volume autologous breast reconstruction centers have lower complication rates. The volume-outcome relationship is stronger for surgery-specific than for systemic complications. Geographic disparities are present in the distribution of high-volume centers. Such information can be used to inform best practices and improve access to care. Risk, III.
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 08/2013; 132(2):192e-200e. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829586c1 · 3.33 Impact Factor