Article

Learn before Lecture: A Strategy That Improves Learning Outcomes in a Large Introductory Biology Class

Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, 92697-1280, USA.
CBE life sciences education (Impact Factor: 1.88). 12/2010; 9(4):473-81. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.10-04-0063
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Actively engaging students in lecture has been shown to increase learning gains. To create time for active learning without displacing content we used two strategies for introducing material before class in a large introductory biology course. Four to five slides from 2007/8 were removed from each of three lectures in 2009 and the information introduced in preclass worksheets or narrated PowerPoint videos. In class, time created by shifting lecture material to learn before lecture (LBL) assignments was used to engage students in application of their new knowledge. Learning was evaluated by comparing student performance in 2009 versus 2007/8 on LBL-related question pairs, matched by level and format. The percentage of students who correctly answered five of six LBL-related exam questions was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in 2009 versus 2007/8. The mean increase in performance was 21% across the six LBL-related questions compared with <3% on all non-LBL exam questions. The worksheet and video LBL formats were equally effective based on a cross-over experimental design. These results demonstrate that LBLs combined with interactive exercises can be implemented incrementally and result in significant increases in learning gains in large introductory biology classes.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Diane K O'Dowd, Aug 28, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
100 Views
  • Source
    • "Instead, with the use of technology and flipped learning, a teaching approach prominent in recent discussions pertaining to computer assisted language learning (CALL), an environment in which teachers have the opportunity to provide students with individualized instruction and feedback on their learning progress may be achieved. Researchers, such as Alvarez (2011) and Moravec et al. (2010), describe a flipped classroom as a teaching methodology in which practice exercises and assignments that are usually completed by students at home in a regular classroom are done during class under the individual guidance of the teacher. Conversely, lectures and textbook explanations, which would traditionally be performed by the teacher in front of the classroom with students listening, are instead recorded and made available to students via an online video sharing website, such as YouTube®. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The authors discuss the empirical results of a study comparing two English composition courses conducted with Japanese university students. One course was taught in a traditional way and the other using the flipped method. The results showed that those studying under the flipped method spent a significantly higher number of hours preparing for class (t(20) = 2.67, p = .014, d = 1.14) and produced a significantly higher number of words in compositions written in the posttest (t(10) = 3.37, p = .007, d = 1.44). The flipped method also appeared to result in significantly greater improvements in the writing proficiency of participants (t(32) = 5.17, p < .001, d = 1.15) and when using a one-way ANCOVA to make a comparison with the traditional method in the posttest (F (1, 63) = 13.50, p < .001, η 2 = .18). The capability to view explanations of the text as many times as participants wished, as well as opportunities for direct and immediate individual feedback from the instructor for participants in the flipped group are discussed as possible reasons for the salient differences.
  • Source
    • "Second, students tend to prefer ICM to traditional lecture once they have finished the course (Bates/Galloway 2012). Third, students tend to be more engaged in ICM courses than in traditional lecture classes, i.e. they spend more time on them, attend them more frequently and complete a higher number of exercises (Bates/Galloway 2012; Lage, et al. 2000; Moravec, et al. 2010). These findings are consistent with other research on educational techniques such as active learning, learning objectives or the use of videos (Agarwal/Day 1998; Loviscach 2012; Simkins 1999; Sosin 1997). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The inverted classroom model (ICM) has been successfully used in many disciplines. ICM is an active learning approach that reserves class meetings for hands-on exercises while shifting content learning to the preparatory stage. Multiple studies report better student learning, engagement and satisfaction in ICM classes. ICM is also alleged to better address the diversity of students with different learning styles and levels of preparedness. The technique has been used in IR but there have been few systematic evaluations of ICM's efficacy in large lecture classes in the discipline. Larger class size is a challenge for ICM but it allows the pursuit of higher-order learning objectives than the passive reception of content that characterizes traditional lectures. This paper reports results from an application of the inverted classroom to an introductory IR course during the winter semester 2014/15 at the University of Duisburg-Essen. It first reviews the literature on inverting large lecture classes and then presents our approach for this particular class. We then present preliminary results on ICM's effects on student learning, measured in terms of students' self-assessment, and on student attitudes about the ICM as a teaching method compared to a traditional lecture format.. This project has been funded by the Stifterverband für die deutsche Wissenschaft. We are grateful to Anna Ebert, Achim Görres, Florian Rabuza, Tobias Rammel and Sylvia Ruschin for their assistance. 2
    International Studies Association’s 56th Annual Convention, New Orleans; 02/2015
  • Source
    • " relatively more time receiving instruction and applying their knowledge on these topics compared to students in the traditional classroom . Student performance improved as a result , in keeping with previous litera - ture on the topic ( Crouch and Mazur 2001 ; DesLauriers , Schelew , and Wieman 2011 ; Hake 1998 ; Lage , Platt , and Treglia 2000 ; Moravec et al . 2010 ) . In contrast , I devoted no additional time to discussions of the relevance of students ' projects or advice for organizing a research paper in the flipped classroom compared to the traditional one . Subsequently , it is not surprising that students in the flipped classroom performed no better or worse than students in the traditiona"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: I administer a quasi-experiment using undergraduate political science majors in statistics classes to evaluate whether “flipping the classroom” (the treatment) alters students’ applied problem-solving performance and satisfaction relative to students in a traditional classroom environment (the control). I also assess whether general student characteristics such as when and where students took the prerequisite course, grade point average (GPA), and gender influence performance. I find flipping the classroom gives students statistically significant advantages in difficult, applied areas emphasized in class. Furthermore, students in the flipped classroom feel they learned more and enjoyed the course more than those in a traditional classroom. I argue students’ affective preference for a flipped classroom is important for student motivation, recollection, and future use of quantitative data analysis. Flipping the classroom entails high start-up costs, but it can merit implementing to improve both effective and affective instructional outcomes.
    Journal of Political Science Education 02/2015; 11(1). DOI:10.1080/15512169.2014.985105
Show more