Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial

Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 16.38). 11/2010; 341:c6414. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c6414
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the cost effectiveness, cost utility, and cost-benefit of an integrated care programme compared with usual care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain.
Economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial with 12 months' follow-up.
Primary care (10 physiotherapy practices, one occupational health service, one occupational therapy practice) and secondary care (five hospitals) in the Netherlands, 2005-9.
134 adults aged 18-65 sick listed because of chronic low back pain: 66 were randomised to integrated care and 68 to usual care.
Integrated care consisted of a workplace intervention based on participatory ergonomics, with involvement of a supervisor, and a graded activity programme based on cognitive behavioural principles. Usual care was provided by general practitioners and occupational physicians according to Dutch guidelines.
The primary outcome was duration until sustainable return to work. The secondary outcome was quality adjusted life years (QALYs), measured using EuroQol.
Total costs in the integrated care group (£13 165, SD £13 600) were significantly lower than in the usual care group (£18 475, SD £13 616). Cost effectiveness planes and acceptability curves showed that integrated care was cost effective compared with usual care for return to work and QALYs gained. The cost-benefit analyses showed that every £1 invested in integrated care would return an estimated £26. The net societal benefit of integrated care compared with usual care was £5744.
Implementation of an integrated care programme for patients sick listed with chronic low back pain has a large potential to significantly reduce societal costs, increase effectiveness of care, improve quality of life, and improve function on a broad scale. Integrated care therefore has large gains for patients and society as well as for employers.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mange virksomheter har etablert seniorpolitiske tiltak, hvorav universelle standardiserte tiltak er mest utbredt. Studier tyder på at slike tiltak har begrenset innvirkning på pensjoneringen. Det diskuteres derfor om ikke behovsprøvde og skreddersydde ordninger er bedre. i artikkelen drøfter vi styrker og svakheter ved disse to hovedtypene av seniortiltak. Målet er å klargjøre hvilke faktorer som er viktige for at tiltak både skal fungere i den institusjonaliserte dialogen mellom partene lokalt og for seniorene. Avslutningsvis drøftes en mal for valg av tiltak som i større grad møter de ulike aktørenes behov. Artikkelen bygger i hovedsak på data fra egne casestudier fra det siste tiåret. SSN Online: 1504-7989.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the long term effects of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for patients with chronic low back pain. Systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Electronic searches of Cochrane Back Review Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases up to February 2014, supplemented by hand searching of reference lists and forward citation tracking of included trials. Trials published in full; participants with low back pain for more than three months; multidisciplinary rehabilitation involved a physical component and one or both of a psychological component or a social or work targeted component; multidisciplinary rehabilitation was delivered by healthcare professionals from at least two different professional backgrounds; multidisciplinary rehabilitation was compared with a non- multidisciplinary intervention. Forty one trials included a total of 6858 participants with a mean duration of pain of more than one year who often had failed previous treatment. Sixteen trials provided moderate quality evidence that multidisciplinary rehabilitation decreased pain (standardised mean difference 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.37; equivalent to 0.5 points in a 10 point pain scale) and disability (0.23, 0.06 to 0.40; equivalent to 1.5 points in a 24 point Roland-Morris index) compared with usual care. Nineteen trials provided low quality evidence that multidisciplinary rehabilitation decreased pain (standardised mean difference 0.51, -0.01 to 1.04) and disability (0.68, 0.16 to 1.19) compared with physical treatments, but significant statistical heterogeneity across trials was present. Eight trials provided moderate quality evidence that multidisciplinary rehabilitation improves the odds of being at work one year after intervention (odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.53) compared with physical treatments. Seven trials provided moderate quality evidence that multidisciplinary rehabilitation does not improve the odds of being at work (odds ratio 1.04, 0.73 to 1.47) compared with usual care. Two trials that compared multidisciplinary rehabilitation with surgery found little difference in outcomes and an increased risk of adverse events with surgery. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation interventions were more effective than usual care (moderate quality evidence) and physical treatments (low quality evidence) in decreasing pain and disability in people with chronic low back pain. For work outcomes, multidisciplinary rehabilitation seems to be more effective than physical treatment but not more effective than usual care. © Kamper et al 2015.
    BMJ Clinical Research 02/2015; 350:h444. DOI:10.1136/bmj.h444 · 14.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose of the study To assess the influence of the nature and intensity of functional and contextual limitations, on sick leave prescription in patients with acute low back pain in general practice. Methods A cross-sectional study including 60 patients, all employed, suffering from acute low back pain. Ten residents in training with 21 general practitioners identified and rated the main functional and contextual limitations. Data were collected using the “ATCIF questionnaire”, derived from the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). The analysis of the effect of quantitative and qualitative variables on the decision to prescribe sick leave was based on the Fischer and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively. Results The lack of higher education (P = 0.03) and being in a non-management position (P = 0.05) were associated with the prescription of a sick leave. Sensations of pain accounted for 85% of the organic deficiencies. In 97% of cases, activity limitations concerned mobility. An environmental barrier, most often a poorly adapted workstation, was reported in 52% of patients and was associated with the decision to prescribe sick leave (P = 0.02). The intensity of the limitations in each of the previous three components was associated with the sick leave decision (P < 0.01). Conclusion The decision to prescribe sick leave is associated with the presence of contextual limitations and with the intensity of all limitations observed. The “ATCIF questionnaire” allows better patient evaluation than the traditional approach based solely on diagnosis. It provides support for shared evaluation of the patient and communication between healthcare professionals.
    Archives des Maladies Professionnelles et de l Environnement 06/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.admp.2013.10.005 · 0.09 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 30, 2014