Article

Travel distance as factor in follow-up visit compliance in postlaparoscopic adjustable gastric banding population.

Department of Surgery, Fletcher Allen Healthcare, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont 05401, USA.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (Impact Factor: 4.94). 11/2010; 6(6):597-600.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite the 2008 "American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Perioperative Nutritional, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of the Bariatric Surgery Patient," consensus does not exist for postoperative care in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) patients (grade D evidence). It has been suggested that regular follow-up is related to better outcomes, specifically greater weight loss. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of travel distance to the clinic on the adherence to follow-up visits and weight loss in a cohort of LAGB patients in the setting of a rural, university-affiliated teaching hospital in the United States.
A retrospective chart review was performed of all consecutive LAGB patients for a 1-year period. Linear regression analysis was used to identify the relationships between appointment compliance and the distance traveled and between the amount of weight loss and the distance traveled.
Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the effect of the travel distance to the clinic on the percentage of follow-up visits postoperatively. This effect was not significant (P = .4). Linear regression analysis was also performed to elucidate the effect of the travel distance to the clinic on the amount of weight loss. This effect was significant (P = .04).
The travel distance to the clinic did not seem to be a significant predictor of compliance in a cohort of LAGB patients with ≤ 1 year of follow-up in a rural setting. However, a weak relationship was found between the travel distance to the clinic and weight loss, with patients who traveled further seeming to lose slightly more weight.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
61 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To calculate the public health impact and economic benefit of using ancillary health care professionals for routine postoperative care. The need for specialty surgical care far exceeds its supply, particularly in weight loss surgery. Bariatric surgery is cost-effective and the only effective long-term weight loss strategy for morbidly obese patients. Without clinically appropriate task shifting, surgeons, hospitals, and untreated patients incur a high opportunity cost. Visit schedules, time per visit, and revenues were obtained from bariatric centers of excellence. Case-specific surgeon fees were derived from published Current Procedural Terminology data. The novel Microsoft Excel model was allowed to run until a steady state was evident (status quo). This model was compared with one in which the surgeon participates in follow-up visits beyond 3 months only if there is a complication (task shifting). Changes in operative capacity and national quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. In the status quo model, per capita surgical volume capacity equilibrates at 7 surgical procedures per week, with 27% of the surgeon's time dedicated to routine long-term follow-up visits. Task shifting increases operative capacity by 38%, resulting in 143,000 to 882,000 QALYs gained annually. Per surgeon, task shifting achieves an annual increase of 95 to 588 QALYs, $5 million in facility revenue, 48 cases of cure of obstructive sleep apnea, 44 cases of remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 35 cases of cure of hypertension. Optimal resource allocation through task shifting is economically appealing and can achieve dramatic public health benefit by increasing access to specialty surgery.
    Annals of surgery 04/2014; · 7.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Retaining participants in observational longitudinal studies after bariatric surgery is difficult yet critical because the retention rate affects interpretation and generalizability of results. Strategies for keeping participants involved in such studies are not commonly published. The objective of this study was to review LABS retention strategies and present the 24-month retention data. Methods The LABS Consortium monitors an observational cohort study of 2458 adults enrolled before bariatric surgery at 10 centers within the United States (LABS-2). To maximize data completeness, the investigators developed retention strategies, including flexible scheduling, a call protocol, reminder letters, abbreviated visit options, honoraria, travel reimbursement, providing research progress reports, laboratory results, newsletters, study website, and retention surveys. Strategies for locating participants included frequent updates of contact information, sending registered letters, and searching medical and public records. Results At 12 and 24 months, 2426 and 2405 participants remained active, with vital status known for 98.7% and 97.3% and weight obtained for 95.2% and 92.2%, respectively. There were 148 missed visits (6.2%) at 24 months primarily because of inability to contact the participant. Only 15 (0.6%) active participants at 24 months missed all follow-up visits. Although 42 participants could not be located or contacted at 6 months, data were obtained for 23 (54.7%) of them at 12 months, and of the 52 participants who could not be located or contacted at 12 months, data were obtained for 18 (34.6%) at 24 months. Conclusion Longitudinal studies provide the ability to evaluate long-term effects of bariatric surgical procedures. The retention achieved in LABS is superior to that of many published reports but requires extensive effort and resources. This report identifies useful retention strategies. Further research is needed to identify the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of specific retention strategies.
    Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 03/2013; 9(4):514-519. · 4.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medicaid patients tend to have poor access to care and suffer from more obesity and obesity-related co-morbidities compared to their privately insured counterparts. The impact of Medicaid status on outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is unknown. The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence outcomes following LSG in the adult Medicaid population of Louisiana with particular focus on adherence to bariatric aftercare attendance and access to care. A retrospective review of 63 Medicaid patients undergoing LSG was performed. Demographic data, access to care, weight, co-morbidities morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. Changes in weight and obesity-related co-morbidities were analyzed for patients with ≥12 months of follow-up. Regression analyses were used for estimating the relationships among variables. The majority of patients were female and non-Caucasian. The mean age was 38.6 years. Morbidity was 16% and mortality was 0%. The average distance traveled to clinic was 71.9 miles. Within the first year only 10% of the patients attended all post-operative clinic visits. A multiple logistic model showed that the only predictor of clinic attendance was increased age. At a mean follow-up of 17.7 months, the mean percent excess body weight loss was 47.2%. Greater pre-surgical weight was the only variable associated with suboptimal weight loss. Improvement or resolution of all major co-morbidities was seen in 65% of patients. Medicaid patients had a poor attendance at bariatric surgery follow up appointments. Since long-term follow-up is critical, we needed to develop strategies that will optimize follow-up in this patient population.
    JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons / Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 10/2014; 18(4). · 0.79 Impact Factor