Article

Pharyngeal Swallow Adaptations to Bolus Volume Measured with High-Resolution Manometry

Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
The Laryngoscope (Impact Factor: 2.03). 12/2010; 120(12):2367-73. DOI: 10.1002/lary.21150
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT : To determine the effect of bolus volume on pharyngeal swallowing using high-resolution manometry (HRM).
: Repeated measures with subjects serving as own controls.
: Twelve subjects swallowed four bolus volumes in the neutral head position: saliva; 5 mL water; 10 mL water; and 20 mL water. Pressure measurements were taken along the length of the pharynx using a high-resolution manometer, with emphasis placed on the velopharynx, tongue base, and upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Variables were analyzed across bolus volumes using three-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) investigating the effect of sex, bolus volume, and pharynx length. Pearson's product moment tests were performed to evaluate how pharyngeal pressure and timing events changed across bolus volume.
: Velopharyngeal duration, maximum tongue base pressure, tongue base pressure rise rate, UES opening duration, and total swallow duration varied significantly across bolus volume. Sex did not have an effect, whereas pharynx length appeared to affect tongue base pressure duration. Maximum velopharyngeal pressure and minimum UES pressure had a direct relationship with bolus volume, whereas maximum tongue base pressure had an inverse relationship. Velopharyngeal pressure duration, UES opening duration, and total swallow duration increased as bolus volume increased.
: Differences in pharyngeal pressures and timing of key pressure events were detected across varying bolus volumes. Knowing the relationships between bolus volume and pharyngeal pressure activity can be valuable when diagnosing and treating dysphagic patients.

0 Followers
 · 
131 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Swallowing is a complex biomechanical process. In this review, several different techniques for measuring swallowing physiology are described, and limitations of each instrumental perspective are discussed. The techniques discussed include videofluoroscopy, endoscopy, 3D dynamic CT imaging, ultrasound, electromagnetic articulography, electromyography, lingual and pharyngeal manometry, electropalatography, airflow measurement and swallowing acoustics/accelerometry. It is hoped that this review will inform scientists in the food oral processing field regarding methods that may be useful for capturing relevant features of swallowing behavior across different food textures and liquid consistencies. Likewise, it is hoped that the delineation of current gaps in knowledge will reveal topics of shared interest for swallowing and food oral scientists as a first step towards future collaboration.
    Journal of Texture Studies 11/2014; DOI:10.1111/jtxs.12101 · 1.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background/Aims Impedance analysis using high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) enables the recognition of pharyngeal residue in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. The aims of this study were to evaluate appropriate criteria for impedance analysis in a large patient cohort, as well as the diagnostic accuracy and agreement of analysis performed by HRIM trainees. Methods We reviewed 33 controls (13 males; median age, 61.2 years) and 104 oropharyngeal dysphagia patients (61 males; median age, 70.4 years) who underwent a flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing study (FEES) and HRIM. Two experts compared the pharyngeal residue on FEES and impedance color pattern at 1,000, 1,500 and 2,000 Ω of the impedance bar. Three trainees were given a 60 minutes tutorial to determine the diagnostic accuracy and agreement of this analysis. Results The diagnostic sensitivity of experts for predicting liquid residue was 73.1% for 1,000 Ω, 96.2% for 1,500 Ω and 100% for 2,000 Ω. Significantly higher sensitivity was observed at 1,500 Ω compared to 1,000 Ω (P < 0.001). The diagnostic specificity of experts for liquid residue was 98.3% for 1,000 Ω, 96.6% for 1,500 Ω and 83.1% for 2,000 Ω. There was a higher specificity at 1,500 Ω compared to 2,000 Ω (P = 0.008). The κ value among the 3 trainees was 0.89 and the diagnostic accuracy of the trainees for liquid residue was comparable to that of the experts. Conclusions The impedance analysis at 1,500 Ω provides more accurate information for the detection of liquid residue, irrespective of the level of expertise.
    Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility 06/2014; 20(3). DOI:10.5056/jnm14007 · 2.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Deficits of airway protection can have deleterious effects to health and quality of life. Effective airway protection requires a continuum of behaviors including swallowing and cough. Swallowing prevents material from entering the airway and coughing ejects endogenous material from the airway. There is significant overlap between the control mechanisms for swallowing and cough. In this review we will present the existing literature to support a novel framework for understanding shared substrates of airway protection. This framework was originally adapted from Eccles' model of cough28 (2009) by Hegland, et al.42 (2012). It will serve to provide a basis from which to develop future studies and test specific hypotheses that advance our field and ultimately improve outcomes for people with airway protective deficits.
    Journal of applied oral science: revista FOB 07/2014; 22(4):251-260. DOI:10.1590/1678-775720140132 · 0.80 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
39 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014