MR perfusion and diffusion imaging in the follow-up of recurrent glioblastoma treated with dendritic cell immunotherapy: a pilot study.

Department of Radiology, University Clinical Center Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Neuroradiology (Impact Factor: 2.37). 11/2010; 53(10):721-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-010-0802-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the potential value of MR-PWI and MR-DWI to differentiate immune therapy-induced inflammatory response from recurrent glioblastoma tumour growth. Both can present as contrast-enhancing lesions on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Patients with recurrent glioblastoma who could obtain a total or near-total resection were treated with dendritic cell immune therapy according to the HGG-IMMUNO-2003 trial. A retrospective analysis of 32 follow-up MRI examinations (mean follow-up time 21 months) in eight patients was performed for this pilot study. For the statistical analysis, the 32 examinations were divided into three groups: 0-obtained in patients that remained stable during the follow-up period, 1a-obtained in progressive-tumour patients at time points before definite progression and 1b-obtained in patients at or after progression.
Maximum lesional rCBV ratios were highest in group 1b (Student t test, 9.25 ± 2.68; p < 0.001) and were higher in group 1a (4.87 ± 1.61, p < 0.001) compared to group 0 (1.22 ± 0.47). The minimum apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in the contrast-enhancing regions were lower in group 1a (0.62 ± 0.06 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than in group 0 (1.03 ± 0.43 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, p = 0.01) and higher in group 1b (0.76 ± 0.08) compared to 1a (p = 0.02). The minimum ADCs in the FLAIR-hyperintense region were lower in group 1a (0.62 ± 0.06, p = 0.02) compared to group 0 (0.76 ± 0.16) but not significantly different in group 1b (0.68 ± 0.07) from groups 0 and 1a (p = 0.33, p = 0.10). The mean ADCs of the FLAIR-hyperintense region and the mean ADCs of the contrast-enhancing lesion were not significantly different.
The maximum lesional rCBV ratios and minimum ADC values in the contrast-enhancing area are potential radiological markers to differentiate between immune therapy-induced inflammatory response and recurrent glioblastoma tumour growth in glioblastoma patients treated with immune therapy.


Available from: Steven De Vleeschouwer, Jun 16, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glioblastoma, the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults is a devastating diagnosis with an average survival of 14-16 months using the current standard of care treatment. The determination of treatment response and clinical decision making is based on the accuracy of radiographic assessment. Notwithstanding, challenges exist in the neuroimaging evaluation of patients undergoing treatment for malignant glioma. Differentiating treatment response from tumor progression is problematic and currently combines long-term follow-up using standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with clinical status and corticosteroid-dependency assessments. In the clinical trial setting, treatment with gene therapy, vaccines, immunotherapy, and targeted biologicals similarly produces MRI changes mimicking disease progression. A neuroimaging method to clearly distinguish between pseudoprogression and tumor progression has unfortunately not been found to date. With the incorporation of antiangiogenic therapies, a further pitfall in imaging interpretation is pseudoresponse. The Macdonald criteria that correlate tumor burden with contrast-enhanced imaging proved insufficient and misleading in the context of rapid blood-brain barrier normalization following antiangiogenic treatment that is not accompanied by expected survival benefit. Even improved criteria, such as the RANO criteria, which incorporate non-enhancing disease, clinical status, and need for corticosteroid use, fall short of definitively distinguishing tumor progression, pseudoresponse, and pseudoprogression. This review focuses on advanced imaging techniques including perfusion MRI, diffusion MRI, MR spectroscopy, and new positron emission tomography imaging tracers. The relevant image analysis algorithms and interpretation methods of these promising techniques are discussed in the context of determining response and progression during treatment of glioblastoma both in the standard of care and in clinical trial context.
    Frontiers in Neurology 02/2015; 6:33. DOI:10.3389/fneur.2015.00033
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Perfusion and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI, dMRI) are valuable diagnostic tools for assessing brain tumors in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation of pMRI and dMRI with (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET PET) in suspected low-grade gliomas (LGG) prior to surgery. Twenty-four adults with suspected LGG were enrolled in an observational study and examined by MET PET, pMRI and dMRI. Histological tumor diagnosis was confirmed in 23/24 patients (18 gliomas grade II, 5 gliomas grade III). The maximum relative cerebral blood volume (rCBVmax) and the minimum mean diffusivity (MDmin) were measured in tumor areas with highest MET uptake (hotspot) on PET by using automated co-registration of MRI and PET scans. A clearly defined hotspot on PET was present in all 23 tumors. Regions with rCBVmax corresponded with hotspot regions in all tumors, regions with MDmin corresponded with hotspot regions in 20/23 tumors. The correlation between rCBVmax (r = 0.19, P = 0.38) and MDmin (r = -0.41, P = 0.053) with MET uptake in the hotspot was not statistically significant. Taken into account the difficulties of measuring perfusion abnormalities in non-enhancing gliomas, this study demonstrates that co-registered MET PET and pMRI facilitates the identification of regions with rCBVmax. Furthermore, the lack of a clear positive correlation between tumor metabolism in terms of MET uptake and tumor vascularity measured as rCBVmax suggests that combined pMRI/PET provides complementary baseline imaging data in these tumors.
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology 06/2013; 114(2). DOI:10.1007/s11060-013-1178-3 · 2.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Diffuse brainstem gliomas (BSGs) and other high-grade gliomas (HGGs) of childhood carry a dismal prognosis despite current treatments, and new therapies are needed. Having identified a series of glioma-associated antigens (GAAs) commonly overexpressed in pediatric gliomas, we initiated a pilot study of subcutaneous vaccinations with GAA epitope peptides in HLA-A2-positive children with newly diagnosed BSG and HGG. Patients and Methods GAAs were EphA2, interleukin-13 receptor alpha 2 (IL-13R alpha 2), and survivin, and their peptide epitopes were emulsified in Montanide-ISA-51 and given every 3 weeks with intramuscular polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized by lysine and carboxymethylcellulose for eight courses, followed by booster vaccinations every 6 weeks. Primary end points were safety and T-cell responses against vaccine-targeted GAA epitopes. Treatment response was evaluated clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging. Results Twenty-six children were enrolled, 14 with newly diagnosed BSG treated with irradiation and 12 with newly diagnosed BSG or HGG treated with irradiation and concurrent chemotherapy. No dose-limiting non-CNS toxicity was encountered. Five children had symptomatic pseudoprogression, which responded to dexamethasone and was associated with prolonged survival. Only two patients had progressive disease during the first two vaccine courses; 19 had stable disease, two had partial responses, one had a minor response, and two had prolonged disease-free status after surgery. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot analysis in 21 children showed positive anti-GAA immune responses in 13: to IL-13R alpha 2 in 10, EphA2 in 11, and survivin in three. Conclusion GAA peptide vaccination in children with gliomas is generally well tolerated and has preliminary evidence of immunologic and clinical responses. Careful monitoring and management of pseudoprogression is essential. (C) 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 06/2014; 32(19). DOI:10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0526 · 17.88 Impact Factor