Article

Intracranial large vessel occlusion as a predictor of decline in functional status after transient ischemic attack.

Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Stroke (Impact Factor: 6.02). 01/2011; 42(1):44-7. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.591099
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT clinical scores help predict outcome after transient ischemic attack (TIA), and imaging studies may improve the accuracy of predictions. Intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) predicts poor outcome after stroke, but the natural history of symptomatic intracranial LVO in patients with TIA is unknown.
we studied patients presenting with TIA in the STOP Stroke Study, a prospective imaging-based study of stroke outcomes. All patients underwent brain CTA. If an intracranial vascular occlusion was found in an appropriate territory to account for clinical findings, then it was judged to be a symptomatic LVO. Baseline characteristics, follow-up events, and outcomes were collected. Characteristics of patients with and without LVO were compared using χ(2) and t tests. Predictors of LVO were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. LVO was assessed as a predictor of asymptomatic outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score, 0), poor outcome (mRS score ≤ 3), and increase in mRS score over the study period.
of 97 patients with TIA, 13 (13%) had symptomatic intracranial LVO. Patients with LVO had higher baseline NIHSS on emergency department arrival, which was an independent predictor of LVO (OR, 1.15 per point; 95% CI, 1.02-1.29; P=0.02). Patients with LVO were more likely to have an increase in mRS score during the 90-day follow-up (P=0.03). LVO independently predicted an increase in mRS score (OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 1.23-18.43; P=0.02) and was a borderline predictor of poor outcome (mRS score ≥ 3; OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 0.92-28.03; P=0.06).
LVO is found in >1 in 10 patients presenting with TIA and predicts a decline in functional status, likely attributable to new brain ischemia.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
72 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute ischemic stroke due to proximal intracranial vessel occlusion is associated with poor prognosis and neurologic outcomes. Outcomes specifically in patients with stroke due to these occlusions and lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (0-7 range) have not been described previously. We retrospectively reviewed discharge outcomes (reported in our 'Get With the Guidelines-Stroke' database) in patients with an admission NIHSS score of 0-7 due to proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion (based on CT angiography results) who were excluded from receiving intravenous (IV) thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and endovascular intra-arterial (IA) stroke interventions. Among the 204 patients included in our analysis, younger age and lower admission NIHSS score (0-4 range) were strong predictors of good outcome (defined as ability to ambulate independently) at discharge whereas female sex was a predictor of poor outcome. There was no significant difference between cerebrovascular risk factors, specific sites of occlusion, or presenting symptoms and outcomes at discharge. There was great variability in functional outcomes at discharge and discharge disposition (home versus acute or subacute facility or nursing home versus death/hospice) with a trend toward worse outcomes in patients with higher (5-7 range) NIHSS scores on admission. Patients with acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion and low admission NIHSS scores (0-7 range) may have poor functional outcomes at discharge. These patients, if not eligible for IV thrombolysis, might benefit from IA revascularization therapies.
    Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery 07/2013; · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Up to 80% of ischemic stroke patients may initially present with minor symptoms. Minor stroke and transient ischemic attack patients are typically treated conservatively with antiplatelet agents and general vascular prevention strategies. Yet a high proportion develop recurrent stroke or progression of stroke and up to one in four of these patients are disabled or dead at follow-up. Minor or rapidly improving symptoms are the top reasons for withholding thrombolytic therapy to time-eligible stroke patients as they are believed to be ‘too good to treat’. The benefits and risks of treating mild ischemic strokes are still unclear. The increasing use of computed tomography angiography and its ability to identify both proximal and distal intracranial occlusions may change this equation. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis and prognosis of mild strokes, the role of neurovascular imaging in treatment decision making, experience with thrombolysis in this patient population, and propose directions for future studies.
    International Journal of Stroke 01/2015; · 4.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several risk scores have been developed to predict the stroke risk after transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, the validation of these scores in different cohorts is still limited. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether these scores were able to predict short-term and long-term risks of stroke in patients with TIA. From the Fukuoka Stroke Registry, 693 patients with TIA were followed up for 3 years. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the hazard ratio of risk factors for stroke. The discriminatory ability of each risk score for incident stroke was estimated by using C-statistics and continuous net reclassification improvement. The multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model revealed that dual TIA and carotid stenosis were both significant predictors for stroke after TIA, whereas abnormal diffusion-weighted image was not. ABCD3 (C-statistics 0.61) and ABCD3-I (C-statistics 0.66) scores improved the short-term predictive ability for stroke (at 7 days) compared with the ABCD2 score (C-statistics 0.54). Addition of intracranial arterial stenosis (at 3 years, continuous net reclassification improvement 30.5%; P<0.01) and exclusion of abnormal diffusion-weighted imaging (at 3 years, continuous net reclassification improvement 24.0%; P<0.05) further improved the predictive ability for stroke risk until 3 years after TIA. The present study demonstrates that ABCD3 and ABCD3-I scores are superior to the ABCD2 score for the prediction of subsequent stroke in patients with TIA. Addition of neuroimaging in the ABCD3 score may enable prediction of long-term stroke risk after TIA.
    Stroke 02/2014; 45(2):418-25. · 6.02 Impact Factor