Article

Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study.

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
BMC Public Health (Impact Factor: 2.08). 01/2010; 10:723. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-723
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Obesity remains a major public health problem, associated with a cluster of metabolic abnormalities. However, individuals exist who are very obese but have normal metabolic parameters. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent differences in metabolic health in very obese women are explained by differences in body fat distribution, insulin resistance and level of physical activity.
This was a cross-sectional pilot study of 39 obese women (age: 28-64 yrs, BMI: 31-67 kg/m2) recruited from community settings. Women were defined as 'metabolically normal' on the basis of blood glucose, lipids and blood pressure. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was used to determine body fat distribution. Detailed lifestyle and metabolic profiles of participants were obtained.
Women with a healthy metabolic profile had lower intra-abdominal fat volume (geometric mean 4.78 l [95% CIs 3.99-5.73] vs 6.96 l [5.82-8.32]) and less insulin resistance (HOMA 3.41 [2.62-4.44] vs 6.67 [5.02-8.86]) than those with an abnormality. The groups did not differ in abdominal subcutaneous fat volume (19.6 l [16.9-22.7] vs 20.6 [17.6-23.9]). A higher proportion of those with a healthy compared to a less healthy metabolic profile met current physical activity guidelines (70% [95% CIs 55.8-84.2] vs 25% [11.6-38.4]). Intra-abdominal fat, insulin resistance and physical activity make independent contributions to metabolic status in very obese women, but explain only around a third of the variance.
A sub-group of women exists who are metabolically normal despite being very obese. Differences in fat distribution, insulin resistance, and physical activity level are associated with metabolic differences in these women, but account only partially for these differences. Future work should focus on strategies to identify those obese individuals most at risk of the negative metabolic consequences of obesity and on identifying other factors that contribute to metabolic status in obese individuals.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
46 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obesity is associated with increased risk of developing metabolic syndrome (MetS), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) leading to higher all-cause mortality. However accumulating evidence suggests that not all obese subjects are at increased cardiometabolic risk and that the "metabolically healthy obese" (MHO) phenotype may exist in the absence of metabolic abnormalities. Despite the knowledge of the existence of obese metabolic phenotypes for some time now there is no standard set of criteria to define metabolic health, thus impacting on the accurate estimation of the prevalence of the MHO phenotype and making comparability between studies difficult. Furthermore prospective studies tracking the development of cardiometabolic disease and mortality in MHO have also produced conflicting results. Limited data regards the determinants of the MHO phenotype exist, particularly in relation to dietary and lifestyle behaviours. In light of the current obesity epidemic it is clear that current "one size fits all" approaches to tackle obesity are largely unsuccessful. Whether dietary, lifestyle and/or therapeutic interventions based on stratification of obese individuals according to their metabolic health phenotype are more effective remains to be seen, with limited and conflicting data available so far. This review will present the current state of the art including the epidemiology of MHO and its definitions, what factors may be important in determining metabolic health status and finally, some potential implications of the MHO phenotype in the context of obesity diagnosis, interventions and treatment.
    Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders 08/2013; · 4.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to compare the lifestyle (leisure-time physical activity, smoking habits and alcohol consumption) and dietary (energy-yielding nutrients, dietary fibre and foods) factors of Finns with a new syndrome called normal-weight obesity (NWO) with those of lean and overweight Finns. The representative population-based study included 4786 participants (25-74 years) from the National FINRISK 2007 Study with a health examination and questionnaires. Food intake was assessed using a validated FFQ. NWO was defined to include those with a normal BMI ( < 25 kg/m2) but excessive body fat (for men ≥ 20 % and for women ≥ 30 %) according to WHO definitions. The proportion of participants with a normal BMI was 28 % in men and 42 % in women. Of these, 34 % of the men and 45 % of the women had the NWO syndrome (among all the participants, 10 and 19 %, respectively). The waist circumference of the NWO participants was between that of the lean and overweight participants. Some potential risk factors, such as physical inactivity, (ex)-smoking and alcohol consumption, were related to NWO. In general, the intakes of energy-yielding nutrients were not associated with NWO. Instead, some healthy dietary factors (e.g. low intakes of meat and soft drinks) as well as unhealthy factors (e.g. low intakes of root vegetables, cereals and fish and high intake of confectionery) were related to NWO. The findings might explain why the NWO participants were of normal weight, but had an excessive body fat percentage. In conclusion, the proportion of normal-weight participants with an excessive body fat percentage was surprisingly high. The identification of NWO people may be of importance because although they appear lean, they have some unhealthy lifestyle and dietary habits related to obesity and overall health.
    The British journal of nutrition 11/2013; · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Weight loss outcomes following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are widely variable, and physical activity (PA) participation improves these results. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively describe PA behaviors before and after LAGB and to evaluate the impact of PA on weight loss outcomes. Participants were 172 individuals (145 females, mean age 43.3 ± 12.0 years, mean body mass index [BMI] 43.8 ± 5.1 kg/m(2)) who underwent LAGB at a university medical center. Height, weight, presence of comorbidities, and PA participation were assessed prior to and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Those who reported engaging in ≥150 min of weekly moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) were considered active. Less than 40 % of participants were active prior to surgery, while 31 % of those who were inactive before surgery became active at 6 months of follow-up. Unlike previous reports on gastric bypass patients, there was no statistically significant (p > 0.05) relationship between postoperative PA status and weight loss outcomes at 3, 6, or 12 months in LAGB patients. Interestingly, participants who reported ≥150 min of MVPA prior to surgery achieved approximately 10 % greater excess weight loss (p < 0.05) and a 2.4-kg/m(2) greater decrease in BMI (p < 0.05) at 1 year post-LAGB compared to those who were inactive preoperatively. In our sample, higher levels of preoperative PA participation were associated with improved weight loss outcomes following LAGB. We posit that higher preoperative volumes are indicative of habitual exercise and that those who report being active prior to surgery are likely to maintain these behaviors throughout follow-up.
    Obesity Surgery 05/2014; · 3.10 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

View
4 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014