Article

2009 cervical cytology guidelines and chlamydia testing among sexually active young women.

Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/ AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.8). 12/2010; 116(6):1319-23. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f91442
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT An American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin published in 2009 recommended that cervical cancer screening should begin at age 21 years and women younger than 30 years should be rescreened every 2 years rather than annually. The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect that decreased frequency of cervical cancer screening would have on chlamydia screening, which is recommended annually for sexually active women aged 25 years or younger.
Using an administrative database of medical claims from commercially insured girls and women, we compared annual chlamydia screening rates of sexually active adolescent girls and young women aged 15 to 25 years in 2007 among those who underwent cervical cancer screening and those who were not screened for cervical cancer.
We identified 701,193 sexually active adolescent girls and young women aged 15 to 25 years. Chlamydia screening rates were significantly higher among adolescent girls and young women who underwent cervical cancer screening compared with those who did not: 43.6% compared with 9.5% for adolescent girls and young women aged 15 to 20 years and 36.1% compared with 12.2% for women aged 21 to 25 years. Among adolescent girls and young women identified as sexually active in 2007, 90.5% had visits for reproductive health services other than cervical cancer screening that could provide opportunities for chlamydia screening.
Although the revised American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin recommending less frequent cervical cancer screening will likely reduce chlamydia screening rates in adolescent girls and young women, health care providers should be aware of other opportunities for chlamydial testing. Options include patient self-collected vaginal swabs and urine specimens collected during visits at which adolescent girls and young women seek other reproductive health or preventive services.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
55 Views
  • Sexual Health 07/2013; · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objetivo: Establecer la asociación entre la infertilidad tubarica y la infección cervical por Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) o Ureaplasma urealiticum (UU), en mujeres infértiles. Métodos: Investigación comparativa y aplicada, con diseño de tipo no experimental, de casos y controles, contemporáneo transeccional y de campo, que incluyó 60 mujeres, separadas en dos grupos pareados de acuerdo si eran infértiles (casos) o fértiles (controles), a las cuales se les tomó una muestra de hisopado endocervical para el diagnóstico molecular de CT o UU y se les realizó una histerosalpingografía para evaluar la permeabilidad de las trompas uterinas. Resultados: Se detectó una prevalencia en mujeres infértiles y fértiles de infección por CT o UU del 18% y 35%, respectivamente; siendo mayor entre las mujeres infértiles, diferencia significativa solo para UU (p<0,05). Se detectó una mayor permeabilidad tubárica en las pacientes fértiles que en las infértiles (80% vs. 40%), siendo el compromiso tubárico mayor en las pacientes infértiles (p<0,05). Al asociar el diagnóstico de CT o UU con los resultados de la histerosalpingografía se constató que la detección de uno de estos microorganismos aumentaba casi 3 o 5 veces más la probabilidad de presentar obstrucción tubárica, respectivamente, diferencias no significativas (p>0,05). Conclusión: Una gran parte de las mujeres infértiles presentan infección por CT o UU, patógenos de transmisión sexual que pudiesen tener responsabilidad en el daño tubárico.
    Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecologia 12/2012; 78(1):32-43.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate adherence to Papanicolaou (Pap) test guidelines 6 months prior to and 6 months following a 30-min educational clinical practice meeting in a pediatric primary care office. Guidelines for Pap tests have been revised in recent years by the American Academy of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the American Cancer Society, and the U.S. Preventive Task Force, but providers often do not adhere to the guidelines. A total of 777 charts from a pediatric primary care office were reviewed. Eighty-four percent (652) met criteria for inclusion. Among sexually active adolescents, there was a statistically significant relationship between rates of Pap tests following the clinical practice meeting (χ(2) (1) = 13.5, p = .001). Prior to the meeting there were 29 Pap tests recorded, whereas after there were two Pap tests done. After the focused clinical practice meeting, providers performed far fewer Pap tests, which is in accordance with the guidelines for this population. Providers may not always practice in accordance with recommended clinical practice guidelines for various reasons. Focused, in-office educational interventions via clinical practice meetings may be an effective way of discussing recommended guidelines to improve provider adherence.
    Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 11/2013; 25(11):584-7.