Processing social aspects of human gaze: A combined fMRI-DTI study

Laboratory for Behavioral Neurology & Imaging of Cognition, Department of Neuroscience & Clinic of Neurology, Medical School, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.36). 03/2011; 55(1):411-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.033
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Human gaze is a critical social cue that can reveal intentions and dispositions of others. The right posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) is thought to be critically involved in processing eye gaze information. We combined diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify direct neural connections of right pSTS and to determine how these connections are modulated by the social significance of perceived gaze shifts. Participants saw faces with direct or averted gaze during event-related fMRI. Half of these faces remained static, and half displayed a dynamic gaze shift either towards or away from the subject. Social attention (dynamic gaze shifts towards the observer) not only increased activity in right pSTS, but also its functional connectivity with the right anterior insula (aIns) and right fusiform gyrus (FG). However, direct fiber connections from pSTS were demonstrated by DTI for the right aIns, but not the right FG. Moreover, the right FG responded to eye motion irrespective of direction and social significance; whereas the right aIns was selectively sensitive to social significance (i.e. gaze shifts towards the observer), but not generally to eye motion. We conclude that the social aspects of mutual gaze contact are processed by direct fiber pathways between right pSTS and right aIns; whereas increased connectivity with FG could reflect an enhanced perceptual analysis of changing facial features in dynamic gaze conditions and involves indirect fiber pathways with pSTS, perhaps via motion-selective regions in middle temporal (MT) gyrus that exhibited strong white-matter connections with both pSTS and FG and could thus provide inputs to these two areas.

Download full-text


Available from: Markus Gschwind, Aug 24, 2015
  • Source
    • " et al . , 2008 ; Hoffman and Haxby , 2000 ; Pageler et al . , 2003 ; Pel - phrey et al . , 2003 ; Puce et al . , 1998 ] , amygdala [ Adams et al . , 2003 ; George et al . , 2001 ; Hadjikhani et al . , 2008 ; Hooker et al . , 2003 ; Kawashima et al . , 1999 ; Sato et al . , 2004 , 2010 ; Straube et al . , 2010 ; Wicker et al . , 2003 ] , MT / V5 [ Ethofer et al . , 2011 ; Hadjikhani et al . , 2008 ; Kuzmanovic et al . , 2009 ; Watanabe et al . , 2001 ; Wicker et al . , 2003 ] , and medial pre - frontal cortex [ MPFC ; Calder et al . , 2002 ; Conty et al . , 2007 ; Kampe et al . , 2003 ; Schilbach et al . , 2006 ] . Senju and Johnson [ 2009 ] explicitly focused in their review on the neural corre - late"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Mona Lisa effect describes the phenomenon when the eyes of a portrait appear to look at the observer regardless of the observer's position. Recently, the metaphor of a cone of gaze has been proposed to describe the range of gaze directions within which a person feels looked at. The width of the gaze cone is about five degrees of visual angle to either side of a given gaze direction. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate how the brain regions involved in gaze direction discrimination would differ between centered and decentered presentation positions of a portrait exhibiting eye contact. Subjects observed a given portrait's eyes. By presenting portraits with varying gaze directions-eye contact (0°), gaze at the edge of the gaze cone (5°), and clearly averted gaze (10°), we revealed that brain response to gaze at the edge of the gaze cone was similar to that produced by eye contact and different from that produced by averted gaze. Right fusiform gyrus and right superior temporal sulcus showed stronger activation when the gaze was averted as compared to eye contact. Gaze sensitive areas, however, were not affected by the portrait's presentation location. In sum, although the brain clearly distinguishes averted from centered gaze, a substantial change of vantage point does not alter neural activity, thus providing a possible explanation why the feeling of eye contact is upheld even in decentered stimulus positions. Hum Brain Mapp, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Human Brain Mapping 02/2015; 36(2). DOI:10.1002/hbm.22651 · 6.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "arousal; Critchley et al., 2000) to provide a neural substrate of conscious experience that guides behavior (Craig, 2009; Seeley et al., 2007). In this line, a study by Ethofer et al. (2011) has found that particularly the anterior insula is selectively sensitive to the social significance of direct gaze (i.e. gaze shifts towards the observer). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Direct gaze is a salient nonverbal signal for social interest and the intention to communicate. In particular, the duration of another's direct gaze can modulate our perception of the social meaning of gaze cues. However, both poor eye contact and deficits in social cognitive processing of gaze are specific diagnostic features of autism. Therefore, investigating neural mechanisms of gaze may provide key insights into the neural mechanisms related to autistic symptoms. Employing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a parametric design, we investigated the neural correlates of the influence of gaze direction and gaze duration on person perception in individuals with high-functioning autism (HFA) and a matched control group. For this purpose, dynamically animated faces of virtual characters, displaying averted or direct gaze of different durations (1 s, 2.5 s and 4 s) were evaluated on a four-point likeability scale. Behavioral results revealed that HFA participants showed no significant difference in likeability ratings depending on gaze duration, while the control group rated the virtual characters as increasingly likeable with increasing gaze duration. On the neural level, direct gaze and increasing direct gaze duration recruit regions of the social neural network (SNN) in control participants, indicating the processing of social salience and a perceived communicative intent. In participants with HFA however, regions of the social neural network were more engaged by averted and decreasing amounts of gaze, while the neural response for processing direct gaze in HFA was not suggestive of any social information processing.
    Clinical neuroimaging 09/2013; 3:340-351. DOI:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.014 · 2.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "There are published results that support functional anatomical asymmetry for processing non-speech face stimuli. For example , the right pSTS has been shown to be critically involved in processing eye gaze stimuli (Ethofer et al., 2011). In an ERP study alternating mouth open and mouth closed stimuli, the most prominent effect was a posterior negative potential around 170 ms which appeared to be larger on the right but was not reliably so (Puce et al., 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The visual mismatch negativity (vMMN), deriving from the brain's response to stimulus deviance, is thought to be generated by the cortex that represents the stimulus. The vMMN response to visual speech stimuli was used in a study of the lateralization of visual speech processing. Previous research suggested that the right posterior temporal cortex has specialization for processing simple non-speech face gestures, and the left posterior temporal cortex has specialization for processing visual speech gestures. Here, visual speech consonant-vowel (CV) stimuli with controlled perceptual dissimilarities were presented in an electroencephalography (EEG) vMMN paradigm. The vMMNs were obtained using the comparison of event-related potentials (ERPs) for separate CVs in their roles as deviant vs. their roles as standard. Four separate vMMN contrasts were tested, two with the perceptually far deviants (i.e., "zha" or "fa") and two with the near deviants (i.e., "zha" or "ta"). Only far deviants evoked the vMMN response over the left posterior temporal cortex. All four deviants evoked vMMNs over the right posterior temporal cortex. The results are interpreted as evidence that the left posterior temporal cortex represents speech contrasts that are perceived as different consonants, and the right posterior temporal cortex represents face gestures that may not be perceived as different CVs.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 07/2013; 7:371. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00371 · 2.90 Impact Factor
Show more