Article

The impact of religious fasting on human health

Cardiorespiratory/Metabolic Laboratory, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.
Nutrition Journal (Impact Factor: 2.64). 11/2010; 9:57. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-57
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The past two decades have seen a rise in the number of investigations examining the health-related effects of religiously motivated fasts. Islamic Ramadan is a 28 - 30 day fast in which food and drink are prohibited during the daylight hours. The majority of health-specific findings related to Ramadan fasting are mixed. The likely causes for these heterogeneous findings are the differences between studies in the following: 1) the amount of daily fasting time; 2) the percentage of subjects who smoke, take oral medications, and/or receive intravenous fluids; and 3) the subjects' typical food choices and eating habits. Greek Orthodox Christians fast for a total of 180 - 200 days each year, and their main fasting periods are the Nativity Fast (40 days prior to Christmas), Lent (48 days prior to Easter), and the Assumption (15 days in August). The fasting periods are more similar than dissimilar, and they can each be described as a variant of vegetarianism. Some of the more favorable effects of these fasts include the lowering of body mass, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio. The Biblical-based Daniel Fast prohibits the consumption of animal products, refined carbohydrates, food additives, preservatives, sweeteners, flavorings, caffeine, and alcohol. It is most commonly partaken for 21 days, although fasts of 10 and 40 days have been observed. Our initial investigation of the Daniel Fast noted favorable effects on several health-related outcomes, including: blood pressure, blood lipids, insulin sensitivity, and biomarkers of oxidative stress. This review summarizes the health-specific effects of these fasts and provides suggestions for future research.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John Trepanowski, Dec 09, 2014
2 Followers
 · 
132 Views
  • Source
    • "For example, a study of Bangladeshi households found that Muslim women had significantly higher BMIs relative to non-Muslim women (Hossain et al. 2012). However, in a review of several other relevant international studies, Trepanowski and Bloomer (2010) concluded that numerous confounding factors such as cultural differences, geographical location, age, gender, and household food security make it difficult to determine the impact of Muslim Ramadan fasting on BMIs of individuals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines the relationship between the use of modern food retailers and health outcomes using data from a survey of 1,180 urban households in Indonesia. The dependent variables include adult and child body-mass index and the share of individuals overweight and obese. After controlling for individual and household characteristics and using standard and Lewbel instrumental variable approaches to control for unobservable characteristics, we do not find a statistically significant relationship between use of supermarkets and adult nutrition measures. On the other hand, there is mixed evidence for a negative effect of supermarkets on child nutrition, particularly for those in high-income households.
    American Journal of Agricultural Economics 03/2015; 97(2). DOI:10.1093/ajae/aau111 · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Caloric restriction ( CR ) consists in the reduction of caloric intake , typically by the 20 – 40% respect to the ad libitum intake of the species , without leading to malnutrition and deficiency in micronutrients . CR is distinct from dietary restriction ( DR ) , in which one or more macronutrients is reduced or removed without affecting the total caloric intake , and from regular fasting such as alternate - day fasting ( ADF ) ( Trepanowski and Bloomer , 2010 ) . The effects of these dietary modifications on health and longevity have been investigated in many species , from yeast to primates , leading to exciting but sometimes controversial results ( Speakman and Mitchell , 2011 ) . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rapid technological advancements achieved in the last years have boosted the progressive identification of age-associated epigenetic changes. These studies not only contribute to shed light on the molecular basis of ageing and age-related diseases but, given the plasticity of epigenetic modifications, also provide the basis for anti-ageing interventions to counteract the onset of age-related diseases. In this review we will discuss nutritional interventions as a promising approach that can positively counteract epigenetic changes associated with ageing and promote the health for the elderly. First, we will give an overview of age-associated epigenetic signatures, focusing on DNA methylation. Then, we will report recent evidences regarding the epigenetic changes induced by nutritional interventions in the adulthood (referred as "epigenetic diets"), such as i) caloric/dietary restriction, ii) diet supplementation with nutrients involved in one-carbon metabolism and iii) diet supplementation with bioactive food components. Attention will be drawn on the limits of current studies and the need of proper human models, such as those provided by the ongoing European project NU-AGE. Finally, we will discuss the potential impact of epigenetic diets on inflammaging and age-related diseases, focusing on cardiovascular disease, highlighting the involvement of epigenetic modifications other than DNA methylation, such as microRNA.
    Mechanisms of ageing and development 01/2014; 136-137. DOI:10.1016/j.mad.2013.12.006 · 3.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The synergistic interaction between food restriction and AMPH on purposeful behavior found in rats may have implications in humans exercising chronic dietary restriction. Dietary restriction is widely practiced in humans while AMPH is widely used and abused (Van Kammen and Murphy 1975; Brauer and de Wit 1996; National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity 1996; Pliszka 2007; Breitbart and Alici 2010; Trepanowski and Bloomer 2010; NDP Group 2013). In humans, chronic food restriction may potentiate responding to certain reinforcers and CS + especially when administered with psychoactive drugs such as AMPH. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Approach behavior is regulated by the brain integrating information about environment and body state. Psychoactive drugs interact with this process. We examined the extent to which caloric (i.e., food) restriction, amphetamine (AMPH) and lithium interact in potentiating locomotor activity and responding reinforced by visual stimulus (VS), a reward unrelated to energy homeostasis. Rats either had ad libitum access to food or received daily rations that maintained 85-90 % of their original body weights. Leverpressing turned on a cue light for 1 s and turned off house light for 5 s. AMPH and lithium were administered through intraperitoneal injections and diet, respectively. Food restriction or AMPH (1 mg/kg) alone had little effect on VS-reinforced responding; however, the combination of the two conditions markedly potentiated VS-reinforced responding (fourfold). Food restriction lasting 7 days or longer was needed to augment AMPH's effect on VS-reinforced responding. AMPH (0.3-3 mg/kg) potentiated locomotor activity similarly between food-restricted and ad libitum groups. Repeated injections of AMPH-sensitized locomotor activity, but not VS-reinforced responding. In addition, while chronic lithium treatments (0.2 % lithium carbonate chow) reduced VS-reinforced responding, chronic lithium further augmented AMPH-potentiated VS-reinforced responding. Food restriction interacts with psychoactive drugs to potentiate goal-directed responding unrelated to food seeking in a much more powerful manner than previously thought. The novel finding that lithium can augment a psychostimulant effect of AMPH suggests caution when combining lithium and psychostimulant drugs in clinical settings.
    Psychopharmacology 10/2013; 231(5). DOI:10.1007/s00213-013-3300-9 · 3.99 Impact Factor
Show more