Massive black holes in stellar systems: 'quiescent' accretion and luminosity

The Astrophysical Journal (Impact Factor: 6.28). 11/2010; 730(2). DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/145
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT Only a small fraction of local galaxies harbor an accreting black hole,
classified as an active galactic nucleus (AGN). However, many stellar systems
are plausibly expected to host black holes, from globular clusters to nuclear
star clusters, to massive galaxies. The mere presence of stars in the vicinity
of a black hole provides a source of fuel via mass loss of evolved stars. In
this paper we assess the expected luminosities of black holes embedded in
stellar systems of different sizes and properties, spanning a large range of
masses. We model the distribution of stars and derive the amount of gas
available to a central black hole through a geometrical model. We estimate the
luminosity of the black holes under simple, but physically grounded,
assumptions on the accretion flow. Finally we discuss the detectability of
'quiescent' black holes in the local Universe.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The existence of massive black holes (MBHs) was postulated in the 1960s, when the first quasars were discovered. In the late 1990s their reality was proven beyond doubt in the Milky way and a handful nearby galaxies. Since then, enormous theoretical and observational efforts have been made to understand the astrophysics of MBHs. We have discovered that some of the most massive black holes known, weighing billions of solar masses, powered luminous quasars within the first billion years of the Universe. The first MBHs must therefore have formed around the time the first stars and galaxies formed. Dynamical evidence also indicates that black holes with masses of millions to billions of solar masses ordinarily dwell in the centers of today's galaxies. MBHs populate galaxy centers today, and shone as quasars in the past; the quiescent black holes that we detect now in nearby bulges are the dormant remnants of this fiery past. In this review we report on basic, but critical, questions regarding the cosmological significance of MBHs. What physical mechanisms led to the formation of the first MBHs? How massive were the initial MBH seeds? When and where did they form? How is the growth of black holes linked to that of their host galaxy? The answers to most of these questions are works in progress, in the spirit of these reports on progress in physics.
    Reports on Progress in Physics 10/2012; 75(12):124901. · 13.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stars may be tidally disrupted if, in a single orbit, they are scattered too close to a supermassive black hole (SMBH). Tidal disruption events are thought to power luminous but short-lived accretion episodes that can light up otherwise quiescent SMBHs in transient flares. Here we explore a more gradual process of tidal stripping where stars approach the tidal disruption radius by stellar evolution while in an eccentric orbit. After the onset of mass transfer, these stars episodically transfer mass to the SMBH every pericenter passage giving rise to low-level flares that repeat on the orbital timescale. Giant stars, in particular, will exhibit a runaway response to mass loss and "spoon-feed" material to the black hole for tens to hundreds of orbital periods. In contrast to full tidal disruption events, the duty cycle of this feeding mode is of order unity for black holes with mass greater than approximately 10 million solar masses. This mode of quasi-steady SMBH feeding is competitive with indirect SMBH feeding through stellar winds, and spoon-fed giant stars may play a significant role in determining the quiescent luminosity of local SMBHs.
    The Astrophysical Journal 07/2013; · 6.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We explore how the co-evolution of massive black holes (MBHs) and galaxies is affected by environmental effects, addressing in particular MBHs hosted in the central galaxies of clusters (we will refer to these galaxies in general as 'CGs'). Recently the sample of MBHs in CGs with dynamically measured masses has increased, and it has been suggested that these MBH masses (M_BH) deviate from the expected correlations with velocity dispersion (sigma) and mass of the bulge (M_bulge) of the host galaxy: MBHs in CGs appear to be `over-massive'. This discrepancy is more pronounced when considering the M_BH-sigma relation than the M_BH-M_bulge one. We show that this behavior stems from a combination of two natural factors, (i) that CGs experience more mergers involving spheroidal galaxies and their MBHs, and (ii) that such mergers are preferentially gas-poor. We use a combination of analytical and semi-analytical models to investigate the MBH-galaxy co-evolution in different environments and find that the combination of these two factors explains the trends observed in current data-sets.
    The Astrophysical Journal 11/2012; 768(1). · 6.28 Impact Factor


Available from