Article

Primate communities are structured more by dispersal limitation than by niches.

Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Journal of Animal Ecology (Impact Factor: 4.84). 11/2010; 80(2):332-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01777.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT 1. A major goal in community ecology is to identify mechanisms that govern the assembly and maintenance of ecological communities. Current models of metacommunity dynamics differ chiefly in the relative emphasis placed on dispersal limitation and niche differentiation as causal mechanisms structuring ecological communities. Herein we investigate the relative roles of these two mechanisms in structuring primate communities in Africa, South America, Madagascar and Borneo. 2. We hypothesized that if dispersal limitation is important in structuring communities, then community similarity should depend on geographical proximity even after controlling for ecological similarity. Conversely, if communities are assembled primarily through niche processes, then community similarity should be determined by ecological similarity regardless of geographical proximity. 3. We performed Mantel and partial Mantel tests to investigate correlations among primate community similarity, ecological distance and geographical distance. Results showed significant and strongly negative relationships between diurnal primate community similarity and both ecological similarity and geographical distance in Madagascar, but significant and stronger negative relationships between community similarity and geographical distance in African, South American and Bornean metacommunities. 4. We conclude that dispersal limitation is an important determinant of primate community structure and may play a stronger role in shaping the structure of some terrestrial vertebrate communities than niche differentiation. These patterns are consistent with neutral theory. We recommend tests of functional equivalence to determine the extent to which neutral theory may explain primate community composition.

1 Bookmark
 · 
110 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined assemblages of trees and two major groups of vertebrate seed dispersers, birds and primates, in Ugandan protected areas to evaluate the roles of dispersal limitation and species sorting in community assembly. We conducted partial Mantel tests to investigate relationships between community similarity, environmental distance and geographic distance. Results showed that environmental factors, specifically temperature and rainfall, significantly and more strongly structured tree assemblages than geographic distance. Analysis of tree dispersal modes revealed wind-dispersed tree guilds were significantly dispersal limited but trees dispersed by animals were not. For assemblages of vertebrate seed dispersers, dispersal limitation significantly and more strongly structured assemblages of primates than species sorting whereas environmental factors significantly and more strongly structured assemblages of birds than dispersal limitation. We therefore examined whether trees dispersed by primates were more dispersal limited than trees dispersed by birds. We found consistent trends that primate fruit trees were more dispersal limited than bird fruit trees using three definitions of dispersal syndromes based on fruit color. Our results suggest that the dispersal abilities of primary consumers may affect the distribution of primary producers at large spatial scales.
    Ecography 01/2013; · 5.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim To evaluate relative importance of niche, historical and spatial processes on the taxonomic and phylogenetic structure of primate communities. Location Neotropics. Methods Data on community composition for 74 sites were gathered from the literature. Communities were characterized based on taxonomic and phylogenetic composition. Three predictive matrices were used as explanatory variables repre-senting ecological (environmental), historical (riverine barriers and Pleistocene refugia) and dispersal-based spatial hypotheses (spatial principal coordinates of neighbour matrices vectors based on geographic coordinates). Variation partition-ing analyses were used to decouple independent and shared effects. Permutation procedures based on redundancy analysis were used to determine if explained variation was statistically significant. Results Forty-nine per cent of variation in taxonomic structure and 66% of variation in phylogenetic structure was explained by selected predictor variables. Independent effects of spatial variables explained the largest portion of variation in both diversity metrics. Fractions representing shared effects of historical and spatial variables, and of all variables combined, were also large and significant. Independ-ent effects of environmental and historical variables were small to non-existent (< 4%). When analysing each phylogenetic metric independently the relative con-tributions of shared fractions changed, although the independent spatial fraction remained the most important predictor.
    Global Ecology and Biogeography 05/2013; 22(5):607-619. · 7.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The site of Loperot in West Turkana, Kenya, is usually assigned to the Early Miocene. Recent discoveries at Loperot, including catarrhine primates, led to a revision of its mammalian fauna. Our revision of the fauna at Loperot shows an unusual taxonomic composition of the catarrhine community as well as several other unique mammalian taxa. Loperot shares two non-cercopithecoid catarrhine taxa with Early Miocene sites near Lake Victoria, e.g., Songhor and the Hiwegi Formation of Rusinga Island, but Loperot shares a cercopithecoid, Noropithecus, with Buluk (Surgei Plateau, near Lake Chew Bahir). We use Simpson's Faunal Resemblance Index (Simpson's FRI), a cluster analysis, and two partial Mantel tests, to compare Loperot to 10 other localities in East Africa representing several time divisions within the Early and Middle Miocene. Simpson's FRI of mammalian communities indicates that Loperot is most similar in its taxonomic composition to the Hiwegi Formation of Rusinga Island, suggesting a similarity in age (≥18 Ma) that implies that Loperot is geographically distant from its contemporaries, i.e.
    International Journal of Primatology 01/2014; · 1.79 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

View
89 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014