Article

Trends in US hospitalization rates and rhythm control therapies following publication of the AFFIRM and RACE trials.

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (Impact Factor: 3.48). 11/2010; 22(5):548-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01950.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The impact of trials comparing rate versus rhythm control for AF on subsequent use of rhythm control therapies and hospitalizations at a national level has not been described.
We queried the Healthcare Cost & Utilization Project on the frequency of hospital admissions and performance of specific rhythm control procedures from 1998-2006. We analyzed trends in hospitalization for AF as principal diagnosis before and after the publication of key rate versus rhythm trials in 2002. We also reviewed the use of electrical cardioversion and catheter ablation as principal procedures during hospital admissions for any cause and for AF as principal diagnosis. We additionally appraised the overall outpatient utilization of antiarrhythmic drugs during this same time frame using IMS Health's National Prescription Audit.™ Admissions for AF as a principal diagnosis increased at 5%/year from 1998-2002. Following publication of the AFFIRM and RACE trials in 2002, admissions declined by 2%/year from 2002-2004, before rising again from 2004-2006. In-hospital electrical cardioversion followed a similar pattern. National prescription volumes for antiarrhythmic drugs grew at <1% per year from 2002 to 2006, with a marked decline in the use of class I-A agents, while catheter ablations during admissions for AF as the principal diagnosis increased at 30% per year.
The use of rhythm control therapies in the US declined significantly in the first few years after publication of AFFIRM and RACE. This trend reversed by 2005, at which time rapid growth in the use of catheter ablation for AF was observed.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
97 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is well recognised that patients differ in the clinical presentation of atrial fibrillation (AF), ranging from the typical symptom of palpitations, atypical symptoms in others and a substantial that are asymptomatic. Whether the different patterns of presentation are associated with differences in outcomes is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and the prognostic implications of lack of palpitations among patients hospitalised with AF in a large prospective registry. Retrospective analysis of all patients hospitalised with AF in Qatar from 1991 to 2010 was made. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of palpitations on presentation. Clinical characteristics and outcome were analysed. During the 20-year period, 3850 patients were hospitalised for AF; 1724 (44.8%) had palpitations on presentation while 2126 (55.2%) had no palpitations. Patients who lacked palpitations were 9 years older, had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (64.7% vs. 35.3%), underlying coronary artery disease (CAD; 14.6% vs. 6.2%) and severe left ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography (25.5% vs. 6.6%), (all, p = 0.001). There were 141 deaths among the group with no palpitations compared with 19 among the group with palpitations (6.6% vs. 1.1%). Multivariate analysis of mortality predictors identified 'lack of palpitations' as an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (relative risk 5.56; 95% confidence interval 1.20-25.0, p = 0.03). Our study demonstrates for the first time that lack of palpitations as the presenting symptom of patients with AF is associated with worse in-hospital outcome independent of other risk factors or therapy. The underlying mechanisms and the role of confounders warrant further investigation.
    International Journal of Clinical Practice 01/2014; 68(1):122-9. · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently encountered arrhythmia. Prevalence increases with advancing age and so as its associated comorbidities, like heart failure. Choice of pharmacologic therapy depends on whether the goal of treatment is maintaining sinus rhythm or tolerating AF with adequate control of ventricular rates. Antiarrhythmic therapy and conversion of AF into sinus rhythm comes with the side effect profile, and we should select best antiarrhythmic therapy, individualized to the patient. New antiarrhythmic drugs are being tested in clinical trials. Drugs that target remodeling and inflammation are being tested for their use as prevention of AF or as upstream therapy.
    Cardiology Clinics 08/2014; · 1.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: -Permanent coronary artery damage is a hazardous complication of epicardial radiofrequency ablation. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a promising non-thermal ablation modality able to create deep myocardial lesions. We investigated the effects of epicardial IRE on luminal coronary artery diameter and lesion depth.
    Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 08/2014; · 5.95 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
52 Downloads
Available from
Jun 5, 2014