Article

An essential difference between the flavonoids monoHER and quercetin in their interplay with the endogenous antioxidant network.

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 01/2010; 5(11):e13880. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013880
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Antioxidants can scavenge highly reactive radicals. As a result the antioxidants are converted into oxidation products that might cause damage to vital cellular components. To prevent this damage, the human body possesses an intricate network of antioxidants that pass over the reactivity from one antioxidant to another in a controlled way. The aim of the present study was to investigate how the semi-synthetic flavonoid 7-mono-O-(β-hydroxyethyl)-rutoside (monoHER), a potential protective agent against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, fits into this antioxidant network. This position was compared with that of the well-known flavonoid quercetin. The present study shows that the oxidation products of both monoHER and quercetin are reactive towards thiol groups of both GSH and proteins. However, in human blood plasma, oxidized quercetin easily reacts with protein thiols, whereas oxidized monoHER does not react with plasma protein thiols. Our results indicate that this can be explained by the presence of ascorbate in plasma; ascorbate is able to reduce oxidized monoHER to the parent compound monoHER before oxidized monoHER can react with thiols. This is a major difference with oxidized quercetin that preferentially reacts with thiols rather than ascorbate. The difference in selectivity between monoHER and quercetin originates from an intrinsic difference in the chemical nature of their oxidation products, which was corroborated by molecular quantum chemical calculations. These findings point towards an essential difference between structurally closely related flavonoids in their interplay with the endogenous antioxidant network. The advantage of monoHER is that it can safely channel the reactivity of radicals into the antioxidant network where the reactivity is completely neutralized.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
162 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can react with any cellular component leading to oxidative damage. As an adaptive response to ROS, cells activate Nrf2 which enforces the endogenous antioxidant defense. Exogenous antioxidants directly neutralize the ROS and prevent the oxidative damage. This protection against ROS might backfire, because the adaptive response of the cell is prevented. The flavonoid monoHER efficiently scavenges ROS. In this study the effect of monoHER on the oxidative stress as well as the adaptive response was investigated. It was found that monoHER protected against oxidative stress caused in HUVECs by H2O2, while monoHER did not prevent the induction of the adaptive response, including the nuclear translocation of Nrf2 as well as the upregulation of HO-1 gene expression. Remarkably, monoHER added to HUVECs which were not subjected to oxidative stress did not cause an adaptive response. The concept that emerges is that by scavenging ROS, the oxidized monoHER formed channels the reactivity selectively to thiol groups. Oxidized monoHER adducts Keap1, which can set the innate Nrf2 machinery into motion and enforce the endogenous antioxidant defense. In this way monoHER acts as a double-edged sword in cells subjected to oxidative stress; the antioxidant offers direct protection and induces adaptation.
    PharmaNutrition. 07/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Flavonoids have been studied intensely for their ability to act as anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-viral and anti-aging agents and are often marketed as supplements related to their anti-inflammatory activity. Previous studies have primarily focused on the effects of polar natural flavonoids. We examined the activity of novel hydrophobic and lipophilic flavonols against human DU-145 and PC-3 prostate cancer cell lines. All flavonol analogs were more active than the naturally occurring flavonols quercetin, kaempferol, kaempferide and galangin. The most potent analogs were 6.5-fold more active against DU-145 and PC-3 cells than quercetin and fell within the biologically relevant concentration range (low micromolar). We also evaluated the potential toxic effects of flavonol analogs on normal cells, an assessment that has frequently been ignored when studying the anticancer effects of flavonoids. During these analyses, we discovered that various metabolic and DNA staining assays were unreliable methods for assessing cell viability of flavonoids. Flavonoids reduce colorimetric dyes such as MTT and Alamar Blue in the absence of cells. We showed that flavonol-treated prostate cancer cells were stained less intensely with crystal violet than untreated cells at non-toxic concentrations. The trypan blue exclusion assay was selected as a reliable alternative for measuring cell viability.
    International Journal of Oncology 05/2014; · 2.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Antioxidants act as intermediates by picking up the high unselective reactivity of radicals and transferring it to other molecules. In this process the reactivity is reduced and becomes selective. This channeling of the reactivity can cause selective toxicity. The antioxidant quercetin is known to channel the reactivity towards thiol groups. The present study compares the thiol reactivity of quercetin with that of 4'O-methylquercetin (tamarixetin) towards creatine kinase (CK), a vital protein that contains a critical thiol moiety. Our results showed that oxidized quercetin and oxidized tamarixetin both adduct CK, which then loses its enzymatic function. Ascorbate, an important representative of the antioxidant network, is able to prevent adduction to and thus the inhibition of the enzyme by tamarixetin but not by quercetin. Apparently, tamarixetin is less thiol toxic than quercetin, because-rather than adduction to CK-tamarixetin quinone prefers to pass reactivity to the antioxidant network, i.e., to ascorbate. The findings exemplify that radical scavenging flavonoids pick up the reactivity of radicals and act as a pivot in directing the way the reactivity is channeled. A mere minor structural difference of only one methyl moiety between quercetin and tamarixetin appears to have a high impact on the selective, thiol toxicity.
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 01/2014; 15(5):7475-7484. · 2.46 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
44 Downloads
Available from
Aug 5, 2014