Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-modified GIC restorations: a systematic review.

Steffen Mickenautsch, Martin J Tyas, Veerasamy Yengopal, Luciana B Oliveira, Marcelo Bönecker

Division of Public Oral Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown/Johannesburg, South Africa.

Journal Article: The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry 09/2010; 18(3):139-45.

Abstract

This systematic review sought to quantitatively answer the question as to whether, in tooth cavities of the same size, type of dentition and follow-up period, resin-modified glass-ionomer (GIC) restorations, when compared to conventional GIC restorations, offer a significant caries preventive effect, as measured by the absence of caries lesions at the margin of restorations. Six databases were searched for articles in English, Portuguese or Spanish until 07 May 2009. Four articles were accepted and 22 separate datasets extracted. The difference between both types of material were computed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). No meta-analysis was undertaken due to aspects of clinical/methodological heterogeneity. The results of the extracted datasets ranged between RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.81-1.01) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.71-1.63; p > 0.05) indicating no difference in the caries preventive effect between both types of materials. Further high-quality randomized control trials are needed in order to confirm these results.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

22 separate datasets
 
95% confidence interval
 
aspects
 
caries preventive effect
 
CI
 
conventional GIC restorations
 
databases
 
high-quality randomized control trials
 
Portuguese
 
quantitatively answer
 
relative risk
 
resin-modified glass-ionomer
 
significant caries preventive effect
 
systematic review
 
tooth cavities