Eplerenone in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure and Mild Symptoms.

INSERM, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 9501 and Unité 961, and the Department of Cardiology, Nancy University, Nancy, France.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 11/2010; 364(1):11-21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009492
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Mineralocorticoid antagonists improve survival among patients with chronic, severe systolic heart failure and heart failure after myocardial infarction. We evaluated the effects of eplerenone in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and mild symptoms.
In this randomized, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 2737 patients with New York Heart Association class II heart failure and an ejection fraction of no more than 35% to receive eplerenone (up to 50 mg daily) or placebo, in addition to recommended therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure.
The trial was stopped prematurely, according to prespecified rules, after a median follow-up period of 21 months. The primary outcome occurred in 18.3% of patients in the eplerenone group as compared with 25.9% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.74; P<0.001). A total of 12.5% of patients receiving eplerenone and 15.5% of those receiving placebo died (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.93; P=0.008); 10.8% and 13.5%, respectively, died of cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.94; P=0.01). Hospitalizations for heart failure and for any cause were also reduced with eplerenone. A serum potassium level exceeding 5.5 mmol per liter occurred in 11.8% of patients in the eplerenone group and 7.2% of those in the placebo group (P<0.001).
Eplerenone, as compared with placebo, reduced both the risk of death and the risk of hospitalization among patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. (Funded by Pfizer; number, NCT00232180.).

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Arterial hypertension is the most prevalent controllable disease world-wide. Yet, we still need to further improve blood pressure control, deal with resistant hypertension, and we hope to reduce risk "beyond blood pressure." The number of candidate molecules aspiring for these aims is constantly declining. The new possible approaches to combat high blood pressure include neprilysin/neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibition, particularly when combined with an angiotensin receptor blockade (such as the ARNI, LCZ696), phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibition (KD027/Slx-2101), natriuretic agents (PL3994), or a long-lasting vasointestinal peptide (VIP) analogue (PB1046). Other options exploit the protective arm of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system by stimulating the angiotensin AT2 receptor (compound 21), the Mas receptor (AVE-0991), or the angiotensin converting enzyme 2. Finally, we review the possibilities how to optimize the use of the available treatment options by using drug combinations or by tailoring therapy to each patient's angiotensin peptide profile.
    Current Hypertension Reports 06/2015; 17(6):557. DOI:10.1007/s11906-015-0557-x · 3.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Galectin-3 is a prognostic heart failure biomarker associated with aldosterone-induced myocardial fibrosis; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) may reduce such fibrosis. We sought to examine outcomes of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) as a function of galectin-3 and MRA therapy. A total of 151 patients with chronic HFrEF were categorized by baseline galectin-3 and subsequent MRA therapy trends with regard to cardiovascular (CV) events, left ventricular remodeling, safety, and quality of life, over a mean of 10 months. Although galectin-3 >20 ng/mL was associated with doubling in adjusted risk for CV events, regardless of MRA treatment, there was no difference in CV event rates with regard to MRA use patterns, independent of galectin-3 concentrations. Specifically, in patients with elevated galectin-3 treated with intensified MRA therapy, a significant difference was not detected in CV event rates (P = .79) or the cumulative number of such events (P = .76). Adjusted analysis revealed no difference in time to first CV event if MRA was added/intensified in those with elevated galectin-3 (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.02, P = .74); similarly, cumulative MRA dose was not a specific predictor of benefit. In those with elevated galectin-3, MRA therapy did not affect left ventricular remodeling indices or quality of life at follow-up; these patients had the highest rates of treatment-related adverse events with intensified MRA use. Regardless of MRA use, elevated galectin-3 was associated with more significant renal dysfunction. Among patients with chronic HFrEF and elevated galectin-3 concentrations, we found no specific benefit from addition or intensification of MRA therapy. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    American Heart Journal 01/2015; 169(3). DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2014.12.012 · 4.56 Impact Factor


Available from