Development and Evaluation of the University of Michigan's Practice-Oriented Research Training (PORT) Program
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, USA.The American journal of occupational therapy.: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association (Impact Factor: 1.7). 09/2010; 64(5):796-803. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2010.08161
We describe the development and evaluation of a clinical research training program designed specifically for such health professionals as occupational and physical therapists. Outcomes of program success included trainees' self-rating of research skills before and after the program, as well as submission of a formal grant application to a grant competition for program participants. At program completion, participants reported improvements in their research skills, with the most gain in formulating research questions and writing a testable hypothesis and the least gain in understanding statistics. Of the 21 participants, 43% submitted a grant proposal to a competitive intramural grant program. In the next year, grantees of the program will continue to be mentored by the program mentors while conducting their research projects. Given the initial successes, this program represents a promising model for providing research training to practicing clinicians.
Article: State of the Journal, 2010The American journal of occupational therapy.: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 11/2010; 64(6):832-40. DOI:10.5014/ajot.2010.064601 · 1.70 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This article describes evidence-based practice (EBP) in the health professions and sciences in general and in the rehabilitation disciplines specifically. It discusses the following: what counts as evidence and how that has changed over the last 4 decades, trends in the short history of evidence-based medicine and EBP, the fallacious nature of most criticisms of EBP, (perceived) shortcomings of clinical research and the resulting evidence in rehabilitation, resources available to clinicians who want their practice to be evidence-based, and the barriers these clinicians face in keeping up with the evidence and applying it in practice. Lastly, it describes how the development of a new art and science, knowledge translation, may play a role in truly making EBP feasible in rehabilitation services.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 06/2012; 93(8 Suppl):S164-76. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.014 · 2.57 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.