Article

Comparison of Economic Efficiency Estimation Methods: Parametric and Non-parametric Techniques.

Manchester School (Impact Factor: 0.26). 01/2002; 70(5):682-709. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9957.00320
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This paper employs a wide range of parametric and non-parametric cost frontiers' efficiency estimation methods to estimate economic efficiency and economies of scale, using the same panel data of 22 Taiwanese commercial banks over the period 1982-1997. According to our empirical implementation, the two methodologies yield similar average efficiency estimates, yet they come to very dissimilar results pertaining to the efficiency rankings, the stability of measured efficiency over time, the consistency between frontier efficiency and conventional performance measures, and the estimates of scale economies. Thus, the choice of an estimation approach can result in very different conclusions and policy implications regarding cost efficiencies and cost economies. These findings are not meaningless to the extent that they are advisable in making policy decisions and evaluations that rely on multiple techniques and specifications. Copyright 2002 by Blackwell Publishers Ltd and The Victoria University of Manchester

0 Bookmarks
 · 
44 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper investigates the consistency of efficiency scores obtained from the stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis methods. We estimate cost efficiency and economies of scale based on an unbalanced panel data set of Chinese banks over the period 1994 to 2007. The results suggest moderate consistency between parametric and non-parametric frontier methods in efficiency scores rankings, identification of best and worst practise banks, the stability of efficiency scores over time and correlation between frontier efficiency and accounting based performance measures. Based on the findings, we conclude that the use of multiple frontier techniques for efficiency analysis is to be strongly recommended and that this methodological cross-checking analysis will result in more robust and convincing assessments of bank performance.
    Economic Modelling 01/2014; 36:298–308. · 0.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current paper extends the non-neutral stochastic frontier production function -which belongs to the class of a one-step procedure as defined by Wang and Schmidt (2002) and developed by Huang and Liu (1994) -from a cross-sectional setting to a panel data modeling. Using a newly-surveyed data set from Taiwan's commercial banks on their investments in information and communication technologies (IT), I find that IT capital and computer labor tend to exhibit higher productivities than their non-IT and non-computer counterparts, that IT capital has a positive impact on productivity, and that the mean technical efficiency is around 60.29%. Evidence is found that the total factor productivity of the banking sector grew at the average rate of 2.53% per annum, albeit fluctuating, for the past six years.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the early 1990s, Taiwan began her deregulation trend in order to enhance competition and economic efficiency across all industries. We derive a theoretical framework to predict possible rankings in technical efficiencies of public, mixed, and private banks. A panel data set with 43 Taiwanese banks during 1997–1999 is used for empirical analysis. We then apply a translog distance function to estimate technical efficiencies. The relationship between technical efficiency and government shareholding is also examined. Empirical results show that a public bank in Taiwan can improve its technical efficiency by mixed ownership at a diminishing rate. Moreover, banks in Taiwan on average performed worse after the 1997 Asian financial crisis.
    Service Industries Journal - SERV IND J. 01/2004; 24(4):129-148.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
0 Downloads
Available from