Article

Diffusion tensor imaging reveals white matter microstructure correlations with auditory processing ability.

Department of Radiology, Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.
Ear and hearing (Impact Factor: 2.83). 11/2010; 32(2):156-67. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181f7a481
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Correlation of white matter microstructure with various cognitive processing tasks and with overall intelligence has been previously demonstrated. We investigate the correlation of white matter microstructure with various higher-order auditory processing tasks, including interpretation of speech-in-noise, recognition of low-pass frequency filtered words, and interpretation of time-compressed sentences at two different values of compression. These tests are typically used to diagnose auditory processing disorder (APD) in children. Our hypothesis is that correlations between white matter microstructure in tracts connecting the temporal, frontal, and parietal lobes, as well as callosal pathways, will be seen. Previous functional imaging studies have shown correlations between activation in temporal, frontal, and parietal regions from higher-order auditory processing tasks. In addition, we hypothesize that the regions displaying correlations will vary according to the task because each task uses a different set of skills.
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data were acquired from a cohort of 17 normal-hearing children aged 9 to 11 yrs. Fractional anisotropy (FA), a measure of white matter fiber tract integrity and organization, was computed and correlated on a voxelwise basis with performance on the auditory processing tasks, controlling for age, sex, and full-scale IQ.
Divergent correlations of white matter FA depending on the particular auditory processing task were found. Positive correlations were found between FA and speech-in-noise in white matter adjoining prefrontal areas and between FA and filtered words in the corpus callosum. Regions exhibiting correlations with time-compressed sentences varied depending on the degree of compression: the greater degree of compression (with the greatest difficulty) resulted in correlations in white matter adjoining prefrontal (dorsal and ventral), whereas the smaller degree of compression (with less difficulty) resulted in correlations in white matter adjoining audiovisual association areas and the posterior cingulate. Only the time-compressed sentences with the lowest degree of compression resulted in positive correlations in the centrum semiovale; all the other tasks resulted in negative correlations.
The dependence of performance on higher-order auditory processing tasks on brain anatomical connectivity was seen in normal-hearing children aged 9 to 11 yrs. Results support a previously hypothesized dual-stream (dorsal and ventral) model of auditory processing, and that higher-order processing tasks rely less on the dorsal stream related to articulatory networks and more on the ventral stream related to semantic comprehension. Results also show that the regions correlating with auditory processing vary according to the specific task, indicating that the neurological bases for the various tests used to diagnose APD in children may be partially independent.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Scott K Holland, Jun 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
228 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IntroductionThe purpose of the present study was to identify biomarkers of listening difficulties by investigating white matter microstructure in children suspected of auditory processing disorder (APD) using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Behavioral studies have suggested that impaired cognitive and/or attention abilities rather than a pure sensory processing deficit underlie listening difficulties and auditory processing disorder (APD) in children. However, the neural signature of listening difficulties has not been investigated.Methods Twelve children with listening difficulties and atypical left ear advantage (LEA) in dichotic listening and twelve age- and gender-matched typically developing children with typical right ear advantage (REA) were tested. Using voxel-based analysis, fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean, axial and radial diffusivity (MD, AD, RD) maps were computed and contrasted between the groups.ResultsListening difficulties were associated with altered white matter microstructure, reflected by decreased FA in frontal multifocal white matter regions centered in prefrontal cortex bilaterally and left anterior cingulate. Increased RD and decreased AD accounted for the decreased FA, suggesting delayed myelination in frontal white matter tracts and disrupted fiber organization in the LEA group. Furthermore, listening difficulties were associated with increased MD (with increase in both RD and AD) in the posterior limb of the internal capsule (sublenticular part) at the auditory radiations where auditory input is transmitted between the thalamus and the auditory cortex.Conclusions Our results provide direct evidence that listening difficulties in children are associated with altered white matter microstructure and that both sensory and supramodal deficits underlie the differences between the groups.
    07/2014; 4(4). DOI:10.1002/brb3.237
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Auditory processing disorder (APD) describes a mixed and poorly understood listening problem characterised by poor speech perception, especially in challenging environments. APD may include an inherited component, and this may be major, but studies reviewed here of children with long-term otitis media with effusion (OME) provide strong evidence for changes in auditory processing acquired through altered experience (deprivation) and brain plasticity. Whether inherited or acquired, it is suggested that APD may be reversed by active learning. Training tunes both bottom-up and top-down neural mechanisms, some that are specific to the trained stimulus and some that reflect more generalised arousal. APD and its treatment therefore provide examples of brain plasticity working either in a negative or in a positive way to modulate listening. LEARNING OUTCOMES: (1) Readers will be able to discuss APD in the context of inheritance and experience. (2) Readers will be able to explain how OME has been shown to alter auditory processing. (3) Readers will be able to list examples of good and bad brain plasticity. (4) Readers will be able to explain what auditory learning is, list some of its properties, and provide examples of its application in therapy for communication disorders.
    Journal of Communication Disorders 07/2007; 40(4):295-304. DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.03.005 · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Auditory processing disorder (APD) is a label that has become increasingly popular in recent years to describe a variable set of symptoms that have in common a difficulty listening to sounds in the absence of an audiometric deficit. The label has been applied to a variety of populations, notably children who may have learning problems, older people who may have sensitivity problems, and patients of all ages with frank brain lesions. This paper focuses on children without known lesions and attempts to develop a diagnostic framework, within the recent definitions of APD proposed by British and US audiological societies. Key to this approach is the notion that APD is primarily a difficulty in processing non-speech sounds. Existing diagnostic practice is too variable to underpin meaningful research, so a population-based approach to identifying outlying performers is advocated. An outstanding diagnostic challenge is the level of perceptual complexity, in terms of stimulus and task/test, at which the difficulty resides. While APD is commonly called ‘C(entral)APD’, it does not map simply onto the function of the traditional central auditory system. This is itself undergoing a transformation as we understand more about dynamic processing in the cochlea, the role of descending (efferent) pathways in cochlear and brain processing, and the role of forebrain structures outside the posterior temporal lobe in hearing and listening. The management of childhood APD has been mainly achieved through modifications to the acoustic environment and sound delivery to the ears, and through auditory and speech training. Recent advances in sensory learning research have led to recommendations that include the use of specific training stimuli (e.g. phonemes), adaptive training algorithms that keep the listener alert, on-task and challenged, and the deployment of motivating computer games that a child is happy to play over multiple training sessions.
    Audiological Medicine 08/2009; 4(1):4-11. DOI:10.1080/16513860600568573