Lymph node cortical sinus organization and relationship to lymphocyte egress dynamics and antigen exposure

The Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 11/2010; 107(47):20447-52. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009968107
Source: PubMed


Recent studies have identified cortical sinuses as sites of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-1 (S1P(1))-dependent T- and B-cell egress from the lymph node (LN) parenchyma. However, the distribution of cortical sinuses in the entire LN and the extent of lymph flow within them has been unclear. Using 3D reconstruction and intravital two-photon microscopy we describe the branched organization of the cortical sinus network within the inguinal LN and show that lymphocyte flow begins within blunt-ended sinuses. Many cortical sinuses are situated adjacent to high endothelial venules, and some lymphocytes access these sinuses within minutes of entering a LN. However, upon entry to inflamed LNs, lymphocytes rapidly up-regulate CD69 and are prevented from accessing cortical sinuses. Using the LN reconstruction data and knowledge of lymphocyte migration and cortical sinus entry dynamics, we developed a mathematical model of T-cell egress from LNs. The model suggests that random walk encounters with lymphatic sinuses are the major factor contributing to LN transit times. A slight discrepancy between predictions of the model and the measured transit times may be explained by lymphocytes undergoing a few rounds of migration between the parenchyma and sinuses before departing from the LN. Because large soluble antigens gain rapid access to cortical sinuses, such parenchyma-sinus shuttling may facilitate antibody responses.

Download full-text


Available from: Irina L. Grigorova,
  • Source
    • "Images were processed and analyzed using Volocity imaging software. Histocytometric analysis of reconstructions was performed with CellProfiler (Carpenter et al., 2006; Grigorova et al., 2010), and CellProfiler Analyst (Hickman et al., 2008; Jones et al., 2008; León et al., 2012). Analysis of reconstructions was performed with individual XY imaging planes, which were representative of at least 400 µm of reconstructed LNs. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dendritic cells (DCs) are well established as potent antigen-presenting cells critical to adaptive immunity. In vaccination approaches, appropriately stimulating lymph node-resident DCs (LNDCs) is highly relevant to effective immunization. Although LNDCs have been implicated in immune response, their ability to directly drive effective immunity to lymph-borne antigen remains unclear. Using an inactive influenza vaccine model and whole node imaging approaches, we observed surprising responsiveness of LNDC populations to vaccine arrival resulting in a transnodal repositioning into specific antigen collection sites within minutes after immunization. Once there, LNDCs acquired viral antigen and initiated activation of viral specific CD4(+) T cells, resulting in germinal center formation and B cell memory in the absence of skin migratory DCs. Together, these results demonstrate an unexpected stimulatory role for LNDCs where they are capable of rapidly locating viral antigen, driving early activation of T cell populations, and independently establishing functional immune response.
    Journal of Experimental Medicine 07/2014; 211(8). DOI:10.1084/jem.20132327 · 12.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In contrast to PROX1, expression of LYVE1, one of the most widely used markers of LECs in normal and tumor tissues, was restricted to the paracortical and medullary sinuses in most LNs, and was not expressed by PROX1+ LECs in the subcapsular and trabecular sinuses. This distribution pattern differs from that observed in murine LNs, where LYVE1 is expressed by sinuses throughout the LN [2], [17]. Previous studies assessing LYVE1 in human LNs did not report the disparity of expression between sinuses in different regions, perhaps due to their focus on medullary sinuses [9], [14]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The lymphatic sinuses in human lymph nodes (LNs) are crucial to LN function yet their structure remains poorly defined. Much of our current knowledge of lymphatic sinuses derives from rodent models, however human LNs differ substantially in their sinus structure, most notably due to the presence of trabeculae and trabecular lymphatic sinuses that rodent LNs lack. Lymphatic sinuses are bounded and traversed by lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs). A better understanding of LECs in human LNs is likely to improve our understanding of the regulation of cell trafficking within LNs, now an important therapeutic target, as well as disease processes that involve lymphatic sinuses. We therefore sought to map all the LECs within human LNs using multicolor immunofluorescence microscopy to visualize the distribution of a range of putative markers. PROX1 was the only marker that uniquely identified the LECs lining and traversing all the sinuses in human LNs. In contrast, LYVE1 and STAB2 were only expressed by LECs in the paracortical and medullary sinuses in the vast majority of LNs studied, whilst the subcapsular and trabecular sinuses lacked these molecules. These data highlight the existence of at least two distinctive populations of LECs within human LNs. Of the other LEC markers, we confirmed VEGFR3 was not specific for LECs, and CD144 and CD31 stained both LECs and blood vascular endothelial cells (BECs); in contrast, CD59 and CD105 stained BECs but not LECs. We also showed that antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in the sinuses could be clearly distinguished from LECs by their expression of CD169, and their lack of expression of PROX1 and STAB2, or endothelial markers such as CD144. However, both LECs and sinus APCs were stained with DCN46, an antibody commonly used to detect CD209.
    PLoS ONE 04/2014; 9(4):e94781. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0094781 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Through high endothelial venules (HEVs), T cells are recruited to LNs, where they are exposed to antigenic peptides presented by MHC molecules expressed on DCs – this initiates the adaptive immune response (5–9). LNs are organized such that when T cells travel through they can be efficiently scanned by DCs to identify that rare cognate encounter (10–12). Such encounters result in binding of cognate T cells to DCs and subsequent activation and proliferation of the T cells. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent studies show that naïve T cells bearing identical T cell receptors experience heterogeneous differentiation and clonal expansion processes. The factors controlling this outcome are not well characterized, and their contributions to immune cell dynamics are similarly poorly understood. In this study, we develop a computational model to elaborate mechanisms occurring within and between two important physiological compartments, lymph nodes and blood, to determine how immune cell dynamics are controlled. Our multi-organ (multi-compartment) model integrates cellular and tissue level events and allows us to examine the heterogeneous differentiation of individual precursor cognate naïve T cells to generate both effector and memory T lymphocytes. Using this model, we simulate a hypothetical immune response and reproduce both primary and recall responses to infection. Increased numbers of antigen-bearing dendritic cells (DCs) are predicted to raise production of both effector and memory T cells, and distinct "sweet spots" of peptide-MHC levels on those DCs exist that favor CD4+ or CD8+ T cell differentiation toward either effector or memory cell phenotypes. This has important implications for vaccine development and immunotherapy.
    Frontiers in Immunology 02/2014; 5:57. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00057
Show more