A Comparison between Standard and Crossfeed Monopulse Radars in Presence of Rough Sea Scattering and Ship Movements

International Journal of Antennas and Propagation (Impact Factor: 0.66). 01/2010; DOI: 10.1155/2010/126757
Source: DOAJ


Monopulse radars are widely used in tracking systems, due to their relative simplicity and theoretical precision, but the presence of multipath impairs the tracking capabilities of these radars, especially when multipath signals are strong, as in a naval environment. A special monopulse setup, the crossfeed, has been proposed in the past to provide an automatic cancellation from smooth sea multipath. In this contribution, the performances of such a system are analyzed in presence of rough sea scattering and compared with those of a standard monopulse setup. Particular attention is devoted to performance degradations due to possible phase errors in the passive network implementing the comparator and due to ship rolling and pitching. This latter requires a full 3D monopulse simulator for its correct evaluation.

Download full-text


Available from: Giunta Giorgio, Mar 31, 2015
25 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Radar systems often experience difficulties when tracking low-altitude targets over the ocean because of multipath effects. Whenever the radar cannot resolve the target from its image, it will track a false target position which can move far above or below the actual position. In this paper, mathematical models are utilized to quantitatively determine the degradation in tracking ability of a monopulse radar due to multipath. The model incorporates provisions for the antenna sum and difference patterns, including sidelobes, and for the antenna polarization. Divergence factors are utilized to account for the curvature of the earth's lossy surface. More accurate calculations of the phase length of the direct and reflected rays using the spherical earth model are included. Smooth and rough surface models are used to model the prevailing sea state. The smooth surface model determines both stable and unstable equilibrium directions toward which the target position is indicated. The rough surface model defines a band of maximum error in the indicated position, as a function of the surface waveheight, and it includes both the rough specular and the rough diffuse reflection term.
    IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 02/1987; DOI:10.1109/JOE.1987.1145238 · 1.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the paper a derivation of the rough-surface reflection coefficient for the coherent reflected field is given. The result obtained assumes a plane wavefront incident on a Gaussian collection of sinusoidal surface waves with uniform phase distribution. The theoretical results obtained is compared with experimental data. In addition, the probability density function of sea-wave elevations is obtained.
    Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, IEE Proceedings H 05/1984; 131(2-131):114 - 116. DOI:10.1049/ip-h-1:19840022
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The National Air Traffic Services (NATS) operates some 20 secondary surveillance radar (SSR) equipped stations throughout the United Kingdom. Radar data is plot extracted on site and fed to control centres in digital form and immediately displayed on radar screens. All data is recorded for any subsequent investigation that may be necessary. Plot position is presently registered to a precision of 1/16 nm in range and 0.0879 degrees in azimuth. Various inaccuracies such as multipath and reflections are associated with SSR. The article is concerned with the diffraction effect of obstructions on both monopulse and sliding window systems. It describes one technique which has proved useful in visualising the effect of nearby obstructions on the angular accuracy of the radar throughout 360 degrees and presents some of the results
    Radar 92. International Conference; 11/1992
Show more