Article

Do erythropoietic-stimulating agents relieve fatigue? A review of reviews.

Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Healthcare Policy & Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Cancer treatment and research 01/2011; 157:181-94. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-7073-2_11 pp.181-94
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Interest in the efficacy and potential deleterious consequences of treatment with erythropoietic-stimulating agents (ESAs) is very high. Recently, the ESAs have come under intense scrutiny as several clinical trials have shown their use to be associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, and a concern for increased mortality risk in oncology. In this context, attention to the effect of ESAs upon fatigue and other aspects of quality of life has tended to be lost. To aid inclusion of this endpoint in the important consideration of risks and benefits of ESA therapy, we summarize the many reviews that have been conducted on this topic. The ten selected reviews were all conducted systematically or were otherwise comprehensive. While these reviews acknowledge an overall positive fatigue or quality-of-life effect, some were equivocal about the meaningfulness or magnitude of the benefit. The overall evidence from these reviews supports a fatigue and overall quality-of-life benefit from treatment with ESAs that is unlikely to be due to chance. This information should be included in the risk/benefit consideration of these controversial agents.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
38 Views

Keywords

aid inclusion
 
aspects
 
benefits
 
clinical trials
 
endpoint
 
erythropoietic-stimulating agents
 
ESA therapy
 
ESAs
 
increased risk
 
intense scrutiny
 
mortality risk
 
potential deleterious consequences
 
quality-of-life benefit
 
quality-of-life effect
 
reviews
 
risk/benefit consideration
 
risks
 
thrombosis
 
unlikely
 

David T Eton