Points of contact: using first-person narratives to help foster empathy in psychiatric residents.

Department of Psychiatry at New York State Psychiatric Institute and with Department of Psychiatry at Columbia University in New York City, NY 10032, USA.
Academic Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 0.81). 11/2010; 34(6):438-41. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ap.34.6.438
Source: PubMed


The authors aimed to determine if writing narratives in psychiatric training can foster empathy for severely and persistently mentally ill patients.
One resident wrote first-person narrative pieces about three different patients at a community mental health clinic. She reviewed these pieces with a writing supervisor weekly. The supervisor and resident examined the style of writing, choice of words, and story line to help the resident learn about her feelings about the patient.
In each narrative, different choices were made that provided clues about that particular resident-patient relationship. These writing exercises helped the resident become more connected to her patients, develop interviewing skills, and engage in more self-reflection.
Narrative writing effectively fostered empathy in a PGY-1 psychiatric resident working with severely and persistently mentally ill patients. This exercise also fostered understanding of countertransference and improved psychiatric history-taking skills. Psychiatry training programs may want to consider incorporating narrative writing exercises into their curriculum.

Download full-text


Available from: Christina Mangurian, Oct 04, 2015
32 Reads
  • Academic Psychiatry 11/2012; 36(6):495-6. DOI:10.1176/appi.ap.12060111 · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • Academic Psychiatry 11/2012; 36(6):496. DOI:10.1176/appi.ap.11110206 · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Students often enter graduate healthcare/biomedical schools with insufficient undergraduate instruction in effective writing, yet the ability to write well affects their career opportunities in health care and in scientific research. Purpose: The present study was conducted to determine the value and effectiveness of instruction by faculty with expertise in teaching writing at a writing center at an academic health science center. Methods: Two separate sources of data were collected and analyzed. First, an anonymous campus-wide survey assessed students' satisfaction and utilization of the university's Writing Center. Second, a nonexperimental objective study was conducted comparing a subsample of students who used versus those who did not receive instruction at the Writing Center on quality of writing, as determined by an evaluator who was blind to students' utilization status. Results: From the campus-wide survey, more than 90% of respondents who used the center (which was 26% of the student body) agreed that it was a valuable and effective resource. From the objective study of writing quality, students who used the Writing Center were twice as likely as students who did not to receive an A grade on the written assignment, and the blinded evaluator accurately estimated which students used the Writing Center based on the clarity of writing. Conclusions: The instruction at the Writing Center at our university is highly valued by students, and its value is further supported by objective evidence of efficacy. Such a center offers the opportunity to provide instruction that medical and other healthcare students increasingly need without requiring additions to existing curricula. By developing competency in writing, students prepare for scholarly pursuits, and through the process of writing, they engage critical thinking skills that can make them more attuned to narrative and more reflective and empathetic in the clinical setting.
    Teaching and Learning in Medicine 04/2013; 25(2):129-33. DOI:10.1080/10401334.2013.770739 · 0.66 Impact Factor
Show more