Article
Metabolic fingerprinting of Cannabis sativa L., cannabinoids and terpenoids for chemotaxonomic and drug standardization purposes.
Division of Pharmacognosy, Section Metabolomics, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Phytochemistry (impact factor:
3.35).
10/2010;
71(17-18):2058-73.
DOI:10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.10.001
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Cannabis - from cultivar to chemovar.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The medicinal use of Cannabis is increasing as countries worldwide are setting up official programs to provide patients with access to safe sources of medicinal-grade Cannabis. An important question that remains to be answered is which of the many varieties of Cannabis should be made available for medicinal use. Drug varieties of Cannabis are commonly distinguished through the use of popular names, with a major distinction being made between Indica and Sativa types. Although more than 700 different cultivars have already been described, it is unclear whether such classification reflects any relevant differences in chemical composition. Some attempts have been made to classify Cannabis varieties based on chemical composition, but they have mainly been useful for forensic applications, distinguishing drug varieties, with high THC content, from the non-drug hemp varieties. The biologically active terpenoids have not been included in these approaches. For a clearer understanding of the medicinal properties of the Cannabis plant, a better classification system, based on a range of potentially active constituents, is needed. The cannabinoids and terpenoids, present in high concentrations in Cannabis flowers, are the main candidates. In this study, we compared cultivars obtained from multiple sources. Based on the analysis of 28 major compounds present in these samples, followed by principal component analysis (PCA) of the quantitative data, we were able to identify the Cannabis constituents that defined the samples into distinct chemovar groups. The study indicates the usefulness of a PCA approach for chemotaxonomic classification of Cannabis varieties.Drug Testing and Analysis 02/2012; 4(7-8):660-7. · 2.54 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
cannabis monoterpenoids
cannabis plant material
Cannabis sativa L
cannabis varieties
cannabis variety
Chemical analysis
clear chemotaxonomic discrimination
compounds
discriminating cannabis varieties
environmental conditions
gas chromatography flame ionization detection method
medicinal plant
medicinal product quality control
plant material
principal component analysis
quality control
quantitative analysis
study 11 cannabis varieties
total 36 compounds
validated