Risk Characterization for Nanotechnology

Risk Analysis (Impact Factor: 2.5). 10/2010; 30(11):1671-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01513.x
Source: PubMed


Nanotechnology is a broad term that encompasses materials, structures, or processes that utilize engineered nanomaterials, which can be defined as materials intentionally designed to have one or more dimensions between 1 and 100 nm. Historically, risk characterization has been viewed as the final phase of a risk assessment process that integrates hazard identification, dose-response assessment, and exposure assessment. The novelty and diversity of materials, structures, and tools that are covered by above-defined "nanotechnology" raise substantial methodological issues and pose significant challenges for each of these phases of risk assessment. These issues and challenges culminate in the risk characterization phase of the risk assessment process, and this article discusses several of these key issues and approaches to developing risk characterization results and their implications for risk management decision making that are specific to nanotechnology.

Download full-text


Available from: Ronald White,
19 Reads
  • Source
    • "That is, a comprehensive assessment of knowns and unknowns may not be conducive to making a timely decision. Williams et al. (2010) suggest, for example, that misplaced concerns about the risk of the technology led to a failure to adopt food irradiation policies that would have reduced the risk of food poisoning. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The series is directed at public servants operating at the science/policy interface in Canada and abroad. It has been designed to bring forth some themes and findings in academic studies for the purpose of synthesis, knowledge transfer and discussion. This paper reviews what we know about how uncertainty is understood and communicated in the policy making environment. It concludes there are multiple sources of uncertainty and that how these are understood differs among actors at the science/policy interface. These uncertainties can arise from chance, myopia or intentionality. They can differ among disciplines, functional groups and individuals. Creating a common understanding of uncertainty can facilitate communication and build trust among the actors. Knowing what we don’t know is often the first step to reducing uncertainty and improving the quality of decisions.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This literature review covers the risk assessment process and addresses both ecological and human receptors. The review covers the risk assessment literature including methodology, analysis, interpretation, management, uncertainty, policy, and regulatory guidance. The review is divided into ecological and human health sections. The focus of the review is on the risk assessment process as it is applied to ecological systems and human health, site investigation and remediation, and natural resources. The objective is to provide an overview of the scope of the literature published in 2010.
    Water Environment Research 12/2010; 83(10):1876-1905. DOI:10.2175/106143011X13075599870252 · 0.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although researchers have intentionally produced and used nanomaterials for more than a century, nanotechnology has made its mark in most areas of daily life in the past 20 years. Now thousands of products contain nanoparticles, nanofibers, or nanostructured parts. Because some chemical products have caused severe problems to human health and to the environment, we should consider the overall biological and toxicological effects of nanomaterials as we decide whether to use them in various products. We should also reflect on the mechanisms for making these decisions, which may greatly influence the development, production, and use of such products.
    Accounts of Chemical Research 10/2012; 46(3). DOI:10.1021/ar3000458 · 22.32 Impact Factor
Show more