Volumetric interpretation of protein adsorption: interfacial packing of protein adsorbed to hydrophobic surfaces from surface-saturating solution concentrations.

Department of Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Biomaterials (Impact Factor: 8.31). 10/2010; 32(4):969-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.075
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The maximum capacity of a hydrophobic adsorbent is interpreted in terms of square or hexagonal (cubic and face-centered-cubic, FCC) interfacial packing models of adsorbed blood proteins in a way that accommodates experimental measurements by the solution-depletion method and quartz-crystal-microbalance (QCM) for the human proteins serum albumin (HSA, 66 kDa), immunoglobulin G (IgG, 160 kDa), fibrinogen (Fib, 341 kDa), and immunoglobulin M (IgM, 1000 kDa). A simple analysis shows that adsorbent capacity is capped by a fixed mass/volume (e.g. mg/mL) surface-region (interphase) concentration and not molar concentration. Nearly analytical agreement between the packing models and experiment suggests that, at surface saturation, above-mentioned proteins assemble within the interphase in a manner that approximates a well-ordered array. HSA saturates a hydrophobic adsorbent with the equivalent of a single square or hexagonally-packed layer of hydrated molecules whereas the larger proteins occupy two-or-more layers, depending on the specific protein under consideration and analytical method used to measure adsorbate mass (solution depletion or QCM). Square or hexagonal (cubic and FCC) packing models cannot be clearly distinguished by comparison to experimental data. QCM measurement of adsorbent capacity is shown to be significantly different than that measured by solution depletion for similar hydrophobic adsorbents. The underlying reason is traced to the fact that QCM measures contribution of both core protein, water of hydration, and interphase water whereas solution depletion measures only the contribution of core protein. It is further shown that thickness of the interphase directly measured by QCM systematically exceeds that inferred from solution-depletion measurements, presumably because the static model used to interpret solution depletion does not accurately capture the complexities of the viscoelastic interfacial environment probed by QCM.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Peptide or protein ligands can be used for molecular decoration to enhance the functionality of synthetic materials. However, some skepticism has arisen about the efficacy of such strategy in practical contexts since serum proteins largely adsorb. To address this issue, it is crucial to ascertain whether a chemically conjugated integrin-binding peptide is fully recognized by a cell even if partially covered by a physisorbed layer of serum protein; in more general terms, if competitive protein fragments physisorbed onto the surface are distinguishable from those chemically anchored to it. Here, we engraft an RGD peptide on poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) surfaces and follow the dynamics of focal adhesion (FA) and cytoskeleton assembly at different times and culture conditions using a variety of analytical tools. Although the presence of serum protein covers the bioconjugated RGD significantly, after the first adhesion phase cells dig into the physisorbed layer and reach the submerged signal to establish a more stable adhesion structure (mature FAs). Although the spreading area index is not substantially affected by the presence of the RGD peptide, cells attached to chemically bound signals develop a stronger adhesive interaction with the materials and assemble a mechanically stable cytoskeleton. This demonstrates that cells are able to discriminate, via mechanosensoring, between adhesive motives belonging to physisorbed proteins and those firmly anchored on the material surface.
    Biomaterials 03/2015; 45. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.012 · 8.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was an in vitro evaluation of the effects of different titanium nitride (TiNx) coatings on Candida albicans (C. albicans) adhesion to titanium and to correlate these findings to differences in specific surface characteristics (surface topography, roughness, chemical component, and surface free energy). TiNx coatings were prepared by physical vapour deposition (PVD), a plasma nitriding process or a dual nitriding process. Surface properties were analysed by the optical stereoscopic microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, roughmeter, and drop shape methods. Quantity comparisons of C. albicans on the four surfaces were assessed by cell count and XTT reduction assays. Types of adhesive C. albicans were explored by SEM and confocal laser scanning microscope. The nitrided modifications were found to influence the surface properties and fungal susceptivity of flat titanium. Compared to flat titanium, fewer adhered C. albicans in yeast form were observed on the TiN-coated surface, whereas the plasma nitrided surface did not show any reduced potential to adhere C. albicans in hyphal or yeast form. The dual nitrided coating showed anti-fungal characteristics, although a small quantity of hyphae were identified. Our findings indicate that the Ti2N phase is prone to C. albicans hyphae, while the TiN phase inhibits their adhesion. Different TiNx phases could influence the characteristics of C. albicans adhesion. TiN coating by PVD could be a potential modification to inhibit C. albicans.
    Archives of oral biology 10/2013; 58(10):1293-301. DOI:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.07.012 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Comparison of protein mass-adsorption-rates to rates-of-change in interfacial tensions reveals that mass adsorption is decoupled from interfacial energetics. This implies that energy-barrier theories describing protein-adsorption kinetics do not accurately capture the physics of the process. An alternative paradigm in which protein molecules rapidly diffuse into an inflating interphase which subsequently slowly shrinks in volume, concentrating adsorbed protein and causing slow concomitant decrease in interfacial tensions, is shown to be consistent with adsorption kinetics measured by solution depletion and tensiometry. Mass adsorption kinetics observed from binary-protein solution is compared to adsorption kinetics from single-protein solution, revealing that organization of two different-sized proteins within the interphase can require significantly longer than that adsorbed from single-protein solution and may require expulsion of initially adsorbed protein which is not observed in the single-protein case.
    Applied Surface Science 12/2012; 262:19–23. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.12.014 · 2.54 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014

Similar Publications