Joint angle variability in the time course of reaching movements

University Hospital Munich Großhadern, Department of Neurology, Munich, Germany.
Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Impact Factor: 3.1). 10/2010; 122(4):759-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.10.003
Source: PubMed


Investigating motor control processes is of primary interest in a number of scientific and practical fields. Movement variability is of increasing interest in this context. However, until now little has been known about the time course of variability during movement execution. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of visual information and task specification on the variability of joint angle motion in reaching movements.
Subjects repetitively reached for a handle. Movement variability was quantified by the within-subjects standard deviation of mean joint angle. The analysis focused on the time course of variability during movement execution.
The availability of visual information did not influence the time course of joint angle variability whereas task specification on reaching accuracy did. Under high accuracy demand variability was reduced more strongly after reaching its maximum.
Results suggest that the availability of visual information plays a minor role in the control of well-trained reaching movements. This suggests that proprioceptive information is the main feedback source to control these movements.
The analysis of the time course of movement variability might be a valuable method to investigate the central or peripheral causes of movement disorders for diagnostic and rehabilitation purposes.

Download full-text


Available from: Melanie Krüger, Oct 09, 2015
16 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reaching movements are often used to study the effectiveness of motor control processes with respect to the final position of arm and hand. Empirical evidence shows that different targets can be grasped with similar final position accuracy. However, movements that achieve similar accuracy at their final position may nevertheless be controlled differently. In particular, control strategies may differ in the control of the abundant degrees of freedom with respect to the task-specific costs. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether the applied control strategy was influenced by the shape of the target to be grasped. It was investigated whether mechanical constraints, imposed on final hand orientation or final hand position by the shape of the targets, affected the synergistic coordination of the kinematic degrees of freedom of the arm. Subjects were asked to grasp either a cylindrical or a spherical target, which imposed different constraints on final hand orientation and position. Besides temporal movement aspects, variability of the joint angles of the arm, as well as variability of hand orientation and hand position was analyzed over the whole time course of movement execution, using the uncontrolled manifold method. Overall movement duration differed between cylindrical and spherical target condition, due to differences in deceleration duration. Reaching movements towards the cylindrical target, which was more constraint in final hand orientation and position, took longer than movements towards the spherical target. Analysis further revealed that the degrees of freedom of the arm were synergistically coordinated to stabilize both hand orientation and hand position, when grasping either the spherical or the cylindrical target. This suggests that the applied control strategy in natural reaching movements can simultaneously account for multiple task constraints. The analysis further revealed that stabilization of hand orientation was stronger when reaching towards a cylindrical target, which imposed more constraints on final hand orientation. In contrast, hand position was more strongly stabilized in the spherical target shape condition, where stronger constraints on final hand position were applied. This suggests that different target shapes do influence the control strategy of reaching movements even though variability at movement end was not affected.
    Human movement science 01/2012; 31(5). DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2011.12.002 · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The elbow is a complex joint that is prone to bleeding episodes. These features as well as the close proximity of the ulnar nerve and the need to use the elbow in many activities of daily living can lead to a range of symptoms including recurrent bleeds, pain, instability or loss of range of movement and nerve compression. Conservative management includes splinting and proprioceptive retraining monitored by a physiotherapist who is a musculoskeletal expert in hemophilia care. In the event that conservative measures are not successful a range of surgical options may be indicated including elbow replacement. These approaches continue to be evaluated in both the short and long term in order to determine the most effective treatment for the symptomatic elbow.
    Haemophilia 07/2012; 18 Suppl 4(s4):101-4. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02833.x · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Empirical evidence suggests that the ability to stabilize important task variables of everyday movements by synergistically coordinating redundant degrees of freedom decreases with aging. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether this decrease may be regarded as a characteristic that also applies for the control of multiple task variables. We asked younger and older subjects to repeatedly reach towards and grasp a handle, while joint angle movement of the arm was recorded. The handle constrained final hand position and final hand orientation. Movement variability was analyzed during movement execution by using the uncontrolled manifold method. Results showed that hand orientation was less stabilized in younger than in older subjects. We conclude that aging changes the stability of important task variables. These changes may lead to decreased stability in some task variables, as reported in the literature, but also to increased stability in other task variables.
    Motor control 07/2013; 17(3):313-9. · 1.23 Impact Factor
Show more