Article

Ultrasound appearances after mesh implantation--evidence of mesh contraction or folding?

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Apolinarska 18, Prague 2 128 00, Czech Republic.
International Urogynecology Journal (Impact Factor: 2.17). 10/2010; 22(5):529-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1308-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Polypropylene meshes are frequently used in abdominal and vaginal reconstructive surgery. Recently, several authors have claimed that mesh-associated complications may be linked to mesh shrinkage. We have performed a prospective study with postoperative follow-up by ultrasound examination at two time points after Prolift anterior implantation to assess changes in the ultrasound appearance of mesh implants over time.
We assessed 36 patients who had undergone mesh implantation with Prolift anterior mesh for the correction of symptomatic anterior vaginal wall prolapse. During the surgery, we measured the actual midline length of the mesh (initial length). On the fourth postoperative day, we performed a vaginal ultrasound examination (US) to measure mesh length in the midsagittal plane. A second US was performed 3-5 months after surgery to repeat this measurement.
There was a significant difference in mesh length determined before and 4 days after surgery (90.3 vs. 57.1 mm, P = <0.0001) indicating intraoperative folding. On comparing early and late postoperative ultrasound measurements, there was a reduction in length from 57.1 to 48.3 mm (P < 0.0001), indicating possible shrinkage or retraction.
Intraoperative folding seems to be responsible for a large part of the difference between preoperative (in vitro) and postoperative (US) measurements of mesh dimensions, suggesting that surgical techniques may require adjustment.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
159 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our aim was to analyze the apparent contraction of meshes in vivo after abdominal wall reconstruction and evaluate histological and biomechanical properties after explantation. Nine New Zealand female rabbits underwent repair of two full-thickness 25 × 30-mm midline defects in the upper and lower parts of the abdomen. These were primarily overlaid by 35 × 40-mm implants of a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) DynaMesh (n = 6) or polypropylene meshes Ultrapro (n = 6) and Marlex (n = 6). Edges of the meshes were secured with iron(II,III) oxide (Fe3O4)-loaded PVDF sutures. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were taken at days 2, 30 and 90 after implantation. The perimeter of the mesh was traced using a 3D spline curve. The apparent surface area or the area within the PVDF sutures was compared with the initial size using the one-sample t test. A two-way repeat analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the apparent surface area over time and between groups. PVDF meshes and sutures with Fe3O4 could be well visualized on MRI. DynaMesh and Marlex each had a 17 % decrease in apparent surface area by day 2 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001), respectively, which persisted after day 90. Whereas there was a decrease in apparent surface area in Ultrapro, it did not reach significance until day 90 (p = 0.01). Overall, the apparent surface area decreased 21 % in all meshes by day 90. No differences in histological or biomechanical properties were observed at day 90. There was a reduction in the apparent surface area between implantation and day 2, indicating that most mesh deformation occurs prior to tissue in-growth.
    International Urogynecology Journal 01/2014; · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • International Urogynecology Journal 02/2014; · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Polypropylene (PP) mesh shrinkage represents a serious complication, as a significant cause of pain and recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse or ventral hernias, frequently requiring several surgical interventions. The retraction seems to be caused by the host, in response to the implantation, through the occurrence of periprosthetic adhesions and fibrosis. We hypothesized that avoiding the postoperative adhesions can prevent PP mesh shrinkage. Sixty rats were randomly assigned to three groups. A standardized hernia defect was induced on the abdominal wall, which was repaired using an extraperitoneal PP mesh alone (group 1), with application of a hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm®, group 2), or an auto-cross-linked polysaccharide hyaluronan-based solution (Hyalobarrier® gel, group 3). Eight weeks after the procedure, a repeat laparotomy was performed. After scoring the adhesion and measuring the mesh surface, a microscopic study of the prosthesis-host tissue interfaces was performed. Group 1 displayed a median shrinkage of 29 % of the mesh. The Seprafilm® group (p = 0.0238) and Hyalobarrier® gel group (p = 0.0072) displayed a significantly smaller reduction of 19.12 and 17 %, respectively. Control group 1 displayed a significantly greater adhesion score (30.40) than the Seprafilm® (11.67, p = 0.0028) and Hyalobarrier® gel groups (11.19, p = 0.0013). The fibrosis was reduced in the Hyalobarrier® gel group only. This experimental study revealed that Hyalobarrier® gel and Seprafilm® can prevent PP mesh shrinkage and postoperative adhesions. They might be integrated in a mesh size-saving strategy, which should preserve the quality and durability of the surgical repair and limit the postoperative pain.
    International Urogynecology Journal 03/2014; · 2.17 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
23 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014