“Do Good Olympics Make Good Neighbors?”

Contemporary Economic Policy (Impact Factor: 0.6). 07/2008; 26(3):460-467. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00067.x
Source: RePEc


"Most studies of mega-events such as Olympic Games find a relatively small impact on the cities that host them. One reason given for this finding is that the event displaces tourists who otherwise would have come to the city. This paper documents such displacement by showing that expenditure at ski resorts in Colorado rose as a result of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games. In addition to supporting previous studies, the spillover effect suggests that cities and states that gain from spillovers might want to support bids for events by nearby cities." Copyright (c) 2008 Western Economic Association International.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael Leeds, Oct 02, 2015
1 Follower
34 Reads
  • Source
    • "He finds that there may be a modest beneficial impact for the state hosting the games, which may come at the expense of the other states. Leeds (2007) examined the impact on Colorado ski resorts of the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics. His argument was that skiers whose access to Utah's ski resorts was blocked by the Olympic Games may have substituted trips to Colorado's nearby resorts. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper reviews the empirical literature assessing the effects of subsidies for professional sports franchises and facilities. The evidence reveals a great deal of consistency among economists doing research in this area. That evidence is that sports subsidies cannot be justified on the grounds of local economic development, income growth or job creation, those arguments most frequently used by subsidy advocates. The paper also relates survey evidence showing that economists in general oppose sports subsidies. In addition to reviewing the empirical literature, we describe the economic intuition that probably underlies the strong consensus among economists against sports subsidies.
    Econ journal watch 02/2008; 5(3):294-315. · 1.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Baumann, Matheson, and Muroi (2008) examine flight arrival data in Japan and present evidence that the Honolulu marathon, which attracts tens of thousands of runners from Japan, reduces the number of American tourists to the Islands during the race weekend. More directly related to the topic at hand, Leeds (2007) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using a panel of international student test scores 1980 – 2000 (PISA and TIMSS), panel fixed effects estimates suggest that government spending decentralization is conducive to student performance. The effect does not appear to be mediated through levels of educational spending.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The triple-bottom line of economic efficiency, environmental integrity and social equity is meant to be used to measure progress towards sustainable development. As major sport events are now used as part of public policy, these events and their legacies have been subjected to related analysis. However, as with more general evaluations, the scrutiny of major events has tended to neglect the social dimension. Major events projects are often justified with reference to their role in addressing urban inequity and promoting collective identities, whilst also criticised for their questionable ethics. This suggests more attention to social sustainability is urgently required. In this paper, the aim is to assess whether major sport events meet the social needs of present and future generations. The intention is not merely to the reveal the social outcomes resulting from previous events, but to review theoretical perspectives through which those effects can be understood. This facilitates understanding of why certain effects occur, rather than merely if they occur.
    Journal of Sport Tourism 08/2009; 14:109-120. DOI:10.1080/14775080902965033
Show more