Article

Control of translation efficiency in yeast by codon-anticodon interactions.

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester Medical School, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
RNA (Impact Factor: 4.62). 10/2010; 16(12):2516-28. DOI: 10.1261/rna.2411710
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The choice of synonymous codons used to encode a polypeptide contributes to substantial differences in translation efficiency between genes. However, both the magnitude and the mechanisms of codon-mediated effects are unknown, as neither the effects of individual codons nor the parameters that modulate codon-mediated regulation are understood, particularly in eukaryotes. To explore this problem in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we performed the first systematic analysis of codon effects on expression. We find that the arginine codon CGA is strongly inhibitory, resulting in progressively and sharply reduced expression with increased CGA codon dosage. CGA-mediated inhibition of expression is primarily due to wobble decoding of CGA, since it is nearly completely suppressed by coexpression of an exact match anticodon-mutated tRNA(Arg(UCG)), and is associated with generation of a smaller RNA fragment, likely due to endonucleolytic cleavage at a stalled ribosome. Moreover, CGA codon pairs are more effective inhibitors of expression than individual CGA codons. These results directly implicate decoding by the ribosome and interactions at neighboring sites within the ribosome as mediators of codon-specific translation efficiency.

1 Follower
 · 
106 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: tRNAs are highly modified, each with a unique set of modifications. Several reports suggest that tRNAs are hypomodified or, in some cases, hypermodified under different growth conditions and in certain cancers. We previously demonstrated that yeast strains depleted of tRNA(His) guanylyltransferase accumulate uncharged tRNA(His) lacking the G(-1) residue and subsequently accumulate additional 5-methylcytidine (m(5)C) at residues C(48) and C(50) of tRNA(His), due to the activity of the m(5)C-methyltransferase Trm4. We show here that the increase in tRNA(His) m(5)C levels does not require loss of Thg1, loss of G(-1) of tRNA(His), or cell death but is associated with growth arrest following different stress conditions. We find substantially increased tRNA(His) m(5)C levels after temperature-sensitive strains are grown at nonpermissive temperature, and after wild-type strains are grown to stationary phase, starved for required amino acids, or treated with rapamycin. We observe more modest accumulations of m(5)C in tRNA(His) after starvation for glucose and after starvation for uracil. In virtually all cases examined, the additional m(5)C on tRNA(His) occurs while cells are fully viable, and the increase is neither due to the GCN4 pathway, nor to increased Trm4 levels. Moreover, the increased m(5)C appears specific to tRNA(His), as tRNA(Val(AAC)) and tRNA(Gly(GCC)) have much reduced additional m(5)C during these growth arrest conditions, although they also have C(48) and C(50) and are capable of having increased m(5)C levels. Thus, tRNA(His) m(5)C levels are unusually responsive to yeast growth conditions, although the significance of this additional m(5)C remains unclear.
    RNA 12/2012; DOI:10.1261/rna.035808.112 · 4.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: All RNA species in yeast cells are subject to turnover. Work over the past 20 years has defined degradation mechanisms for messenger RNAs, transfer RNAs, ribosomal RNAs, and noncoding RNAs. In addition, numerous quality control mechanisms that target aberrant RNAs have been identified. Generally, each decay mechanism contains factors that funnel RNA substrates to abundant exo- and/or endonucleases. Key issues for future work include determining the mechanisms that control the specificity of RNA degradation and how RNA degradation processes interact with translation, RNA transport, and other cellular processes.
    Genetics 07/2012; 191(3):671-702. DOI:10.1534/genetics.111.137265 · 4.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Structural studies of ribosome complexes with bound tRNAs and release factors show considerable contacts between these factors and helix 69 (H69) of 23 S rRNA. Although biochemical and genetic studies have provided some general insights into the role of H69 in tRNA and RF selection, a detailed understanding of these contributions remains elusive. Here, we present a pre- steady-state kinetic analysis establishing that two distinct regions of H69 make critical contributions to substrate selection. The loop of H69 (A1913) forms contacts necessary for the efficient accommodation of a subset of natural tRNA species, whereas the base of the stem (G1922) is specifically critical for UGA codon recognition by the class 1 release factor RF2. These data define a broad and critical role for this centrally located intersubunit helix (H69) in accurate and efficient substrate recognition by the ribosome.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 05/2011; 286(29):25604-10. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M111.256255 · 4.60 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
2 Downloads
Available from