Percutaneous, Intramedullary Fracture Reduction and Extension Block Pinning for Dorsal Proximal Interphalangeal Fracture-Dislocations

Department of Hand Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
The Journal of hand surgery (Impact Factor: 1.33). 10/2010; 35(12):2046-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.08.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A percutaneous, intramedullary fracture reduction technique for treatment of unstable dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint is described and the clinical and radiological results are reported.
We conducted a retrospective clinical follow-up of 16 patients with 18 dorsal fracture-dislocations of the PIP joint. After closed joint reduction, we used an extension block K-wire to maintain the joint reduction. Impacted volar articular fragments were reduced percutaneously under fluoroscopy control using a pre-bent K-wire inserted through the intramedullary canal of the middle phalanx. The patients initiated passive range of motion exercises immediately after surgery. After a mean of 3 weeks, we removed the extension block K-wire and allowed free mobilization. We examined 13 patients with 15 injured fingers at a mean 5-year follow-up (range, 1-8 y).
Radiographic reduction of the joint dislocation was achieved and maintained. The mean articular step-off decreased from 2.1 mm (range, 1.6-3.1 mm) to 0.5 mm (range, 0.0-1.2 mm). At the final follow-up, active PIP motion averaged 83° (range, 65° to 97°) with a mean flexion contracture of 3° (range, 0° to 15°). The mean visual analog scale score for digit pain was 1/10. The mean Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand score of 4/100 indicated little functional impairment.
Percutaneous, intramedullary reduction of the impacted volar articular fragments associated with unstable, dorsal fracture-dislocation of the PIP joint restores joint congruence and function.
Therapeutic IV.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present our experience with 14 volar plate avulsion fractures of the fingers that were treated by excision or internal fixation and discuss the factors affecting the operative techniques and results. Fourteen cases were divided into two groups: the volar plate avulsions with excision (eight cases) and the volar plate avulsions with fixation (six). We compared clinical factors between fracture groups and between fixation methods. Fractures treated with fixation had the larger fragment, a shorter preoperative period, and the larger articular surface involvement than fractures treated with excision. Postoperative pain, average age, patients' satisfaction measured by VAS, DASH scores, grip, and pinch strength were not different between two groups. All fixated fractures healed and the time to union did not differ based on fixation method. The true size of the fracture fragment was larger than expected based on the X-ray and the fragments were usually rotated by pull of the volar plate or ligament. The size and shape of the avulsed fragment might be important factors to determine the treatment method, but the results after operation were not significantly different whether the fragment was excised or fixed.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 07/2013; 133(10). DOI:10.1007/s00402-013-1818-2 · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fracture dislocations of the hand are difficult and often unforgiving injuries. Keys to treatment include early recognition, stable concentric reduction, and protected early active range of motion maintaining joint stability. The balance between stability and mobility is difficult to manage; therefore, surgeons need a wide array of treatments to tailor management to the specific fracture pattern. With appropriate treatment, residual stiffness and pain can be minimized. This Current Concepts review aims to provide up-to-date management for proximal interphalangeal, distal interphalangeal, and metacarpophalangeal joint fracture dislocations.
    The Journal of hand surgery 04/2014; 39(4):792–802. DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.10.001 · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocations are common injuries that require expedient and attentive treatment for the best outcomes. Management can range from protective splinting and early mobilization to complex surgery. In this review, the current concepts surrounding the management of these injuries are reviewed. A literature review was performed of all recent articles pertaining to proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocation, with specific focus on middle phalangeal base fractures. Where appropriate, older articles or articles on closely related injury types were included for completeness. The methodology and outcomes of each study were analyzed. When small avulsion fractures are present, good results are routinely obtained with reduction and early mobilization of stable injuries. Strategies for management of the unstable dorsal fracture-dislocation have evolved over time. To provide early stability, a variety of techniques have evolved, including closed, percutaneous, external, and internal fixation methods. Although each of these techniques can be successful in skilled hands, none has been subjected to rigorous, prospective, comparative trials. Volar dislocations fare less well, with significant loss of motion in many studies. Pilon fractures represent the most complicated injuries, and return of normal motion is not expected. The best outcomes can be achieved by (1) establishing enough stability to allow early motion, (2) restoring gliding joint motion rather than noncongruent motion, and (3) restoring the articular surface congruity when possible. Although the majority of literature on this topic consists of expert opinion and retrospective case series, the consensus appears to favor less invasive techniques whenever possible.
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 12/2014; 134(6):1246-57. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000854 · 3.33 Impact Factor