Article

Dispersion-based pulse shaping for multiplexed two-photon fluorescence microscopy.

Laboratoire d’Optique et Biosciences, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, and INSERM U696, 91128 Palaiseau, France.
Optics Letters (Impact Factor: 3.18). 10/2010; 35(20):3444-6. DOI: 10.1364/OL.35.003444
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We demonstrate selective two-photon excited fluorescence microscopy with shaped pulses produced with a simple yet efficient scheme based on dispersive optical components. The pulse train from a broadband oscillator is split into two subtrains that are sent through different amounts of glass. Beam recombination results in pulse-shape switching at a rate of 150MHz. Time-resolved photon counting detection then provides two simultaneous images resulting from selective two-photon excitation, as demonstrated in a live embryo. Although less versatile than programmable pulse-shaping devices, this novel arrangement significantly improves the performance of selective microscopy using broadband shaped pulses while simplifying the experimental setup.

Full-text

Available from: Emmanuel Beaurepaire, Jun 25, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
100 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this report, we demonstrate how to obtain Raman spectra from single‐beam CARS measurements under the condition of strong overlapping two‐photon excited fluorescence (2PEF). Our approach is based on the use of a narrowband phase gate implemented via femtosecond laser pulse shaping from a single broadband laser source, without any use of polarization or amplitude modulation. The decisive quantity regarding the creation of 2PEF with shaped laser pulses is the second harmonic power spectrum, which shows a different dependence on the excitation phase from the CARS signal generation. By shifting the phase or the position of the gate in an appropriate way, it is possible to keep the second harmonic power spectrum and 2PEF constant, paving the way for an elimination of it. This allows to reconstruct the Raman signal and to retrieve quantitative information of resonances even when the fluorescence is about 160 times larger than the CARS signal. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 10/2013; 44(10). DOI:10.1002/jrs.4243 · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two-photon fluorescence (TPF) process is an important research subject and can be optimized by pulse shaping techniques. In addition to temporal femtosecond pulse shaping by spectral phase modulation, we take into account of spatial configuration in the shaping process. The TPF of Coumarin 500 increases 40% with this additional modulation step. This spatial modulation results in not only transverse spatial profile variation but also effect of temporal redistribution at focus. We show that this spatial modulation is an important dimension for pulse shaping and optimization for TPF.Research highlights► Two photon fluorescence of Coumarin 500 was optimized by combined temporal–spatial pulse shaping using a 2D phase modulator. ► When the spatial phase modulation was applied, the intensity of two photon fluorescence of Coumarin 500 can be further optimized by 40% in addition to temporal only pulses shaping. ► The spatial modulation results in not only spatial profile variation but also effect of temporal redistribution at focus.
    Optics Communications 08/2011; 284(16-17):4070-4072. DOI:10.1016/j.optcom.2011.04.069 · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reverse propagation is a numeric technique that makes it possible to obtain arbitrarily shaped pulses after propagation through a fiber in the nonlinear regime. We apply it to achieve selective two-photon excitation of dyes that have overlapping absorption spectra with pulses transported through the fiber. By comparing both contrast and signal level it is shown that phase and amplitude shaped pulses generated using reverse propagation are superior to pulses with antisymmetric phase despite loss caused by amplitude shaping.
    Physical Review A 07/2012; 86(1):013834. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.86.013834 · 2.99 Impact Factor