Comparative Performance of the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics' Staging System for Uterine Corpus Cancer

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.37). 11/2010; 116(5):1141-9. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f39849
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To perform a population-based analysis comparing the performance of the 1988 and 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging systems.
Women with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus treated between 1988 and 2006 and recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were analyzed. Women were classified based on 1988 and 2009 FIGO staging systems. Major changes in the 2009 system include: 1) classification of patients with stage IA and IB tumors as stage IA; 2) elimination of stage IIA; and 3) stratification of stage IIIC into pelvic nodes only (IIIC1) or paraaortic nodal (IIIC2) involvement. Survival and use of adjuvant therapy were analyzed.
A total of 81,902 women were identified. Based on the 1988 staging system, survival for stage IA was 90.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90-91%) compared with 88.9% (95% CI 88-89%) for IB tumors. In the 2009 system, survival was 89.6% (95% CI 89-90%) for stage IA and 77.6% (95% CI 76-79%) for stage IB. The survival for FIGO 1988 stage IIA was superior to stage IC, whereas in the 2009 system, survival for stage II was inferior to all stage I patients. The newly defined stage IIIC substages are prognostically different. Survival for stage IIIC1 was 57.0% (95% CI 54-60%) compared with 49.4% (95% CI 46-53%) for stage IIIC2.
The 2009 FIGO staging system for uterine corpus cancer is highly prognostic. The reduction in stage I substages and the separation of stage III will further clarify important prognostic features.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: FDG-PET/CT has been evaluated in a variety of gynecologic malignancies in a variety of settings and is approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for the initial and subsequent treatment strategies of these malignancies. Cervical cancer is typically very FDG avid, and FDG-PET/CT appears to be most valuable for initial staging, radiation therapy planning, and detection of recurrent disease. For ovarian cancer, the most value of FDG-PET/CT appears to be for detecting recurrent disease in the setting of rising CA-125 level and negative or equivocal anatomical imaging studies. Initial studies evaluating response to therapy are promising and further work in this area is needed. FDG uptake in both nonmalignant and physiological processes in the pelvis can make interpretation of FDG-PET/CT in this region challenging and knowledge of these entities and patterns can avoid misinterpretation. Some of the most common findings relate to the cyclic changes that occur as part of the menstrual cycle in premenopausal women. Mucinous tumors and low-volume or peritoneal carcinomatosis are causes of false-negative results on FDG-PET/CT studies. As new tracers are developed, comparisons with patient outcomes and standards of care (eg, FDG-PET/CT) will be needed.
    Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 11/2014; 44(6):461-478. DOI:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.06.005 · 3.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with stage III endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and vaginal cuff brachytherapy. We retrospectively identified 83 patients treated for 1988 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III endometrial adenocarcinoma at our institution between 2003 and 2010. All patients underwent comprehensive surgical staging. Adjuvant therapy was carboplatin and paclitaxel for 6 cycles and vaginal cuff brachytherapy. For analysis, patients were grouped into type I (FIGO grade 1-2 endometrioid histology, n = 41) or type II (FIGO grade 3, clear cell or papillary serous histology, n = 42) disease. Forty-three patients (52%) had node-positive disease, with similar node-positive rates for type I (n = 21, 51.2%) and type II (n = 22, 52.4%). The median follow-up was 38.6 months. There were no isolated vaginal failures. The estimated 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for type I versus type II were 92.4% versus 58.0% (P = 0.001) and 97.2% versus 65.8% (P = 0.002), respectively. The 3-year DFS and OS for node negative versus node positive were 85.0% versus 63.6% (P = 0.02) and 84.2% versus 78.0% (P = 0.02), respectively. Associations between type I histology and node-negative disease with improved DFS and OS persisted on multivariate analysis. Our institutional approach of adjuvant chemotherapy and vaginal cuff brachytherapy for stage III endometrial cancer seemed acceptable for patients with low-risk histology or node-negative disease. In contrast, higher rates of failure among those with high-risk histology and/or node-positive disease support intensification of therapy in these subsets.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction The survival rates in endometrial cancer (EC) patients with lymph node (LN) metastasis vary greatly. Many other factors may have impact on the prognosis within this special group. The purpose of this study was to determine factors predicting the progression or death in patients with stage IIIC EC. Materials and methods A single tertiary center, retrospective analysis was conducted in a total of 38 consecutive patients who surgically treated for EC between January 2005 and January 2013. The primary endpoint was the determination of factors predicting the progression, recurrence, or death of any cause. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results The median age at diagnosis was 64 years, and the median follow-up time was 32.50 months (95 % CI 28.75–40.56). The median number of metastatic positive LNs (pelvic and/or paraaortic) was 2, and the LN ratio, expressed as the percentage of positive nodes to total LNs identified, was 6.3 %. The LN ratio (≥6.5 %) was the only independent parameter for progression or death in multiple logistic regression analysis. Patients were stratified according to the LN ratio (P = 0.025]. However, the estimated 32-month OS rates were comparable (94.1 vs. 94.1 %), [HR (95 % CI) = 4.26 (0.44–41.30), P = 0.21]. Discussion The stratification of patients with stage IIIC disease according to the LN ratio may allow better identification of prognostic information and selection of individualized patient-tailored adjuvant treatment modalities.
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 08/2014; 291(2). DOI:10.1007/s00404-014-3409-z · 1.28 Impact Factor