Cross-sectional Biomonitoring of Metals in Adult Populations in Post-war Eastern Croatia. Differences Between Areas of Moderate and Heavy Combat
ABSTRACT To determine differences in metal and metalloid exposure between residents of areas in eastern Croatia exposed to heavy fighting during the war in Croatia and residents of areas exposed to moderate fighting.
Concentrations of aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), barium (Ba), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), uranium (U), vanadium (V), and zinc (Zn), reported to be associated with military operations, were determined in hair, serum, and urine samples using inductively-coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. A total of 127 and 46 participants from areas of heavy and moderate fighting, respectively, were included.
Compared with participants from areas exposed to moderate fighting, participants from areas exposed to heavy fighting had significantly higher serum concentrations of Al (87.61 vs 42.75 μg/L, P=0.007), As (5.05 ∓ 1.79 vs 4.16 ∓ 1.55 μg/L, P=0.003), Ba (7.12 vs 6.01 μg/L, P=0.044), and V (17.98 vs 16.84 μg/L, P=0.008); significantly higher urine concentrations of As (43.90 vs 11.51 μg/L, P<0.001) and Cd (0.67 vs 0.50 μg/L, P=0.031); and significantly higher hair concentrations of Al (12.61 vs 7.33 μg/L, P<0.001), As (0.32 vs 0.05 μg/L, P<0.001), Cd (0.03 vs 0.02 μg/L, P=0.002), Fe (22.58 vs 12.68 μg/L, P=0.001), Pb (1.04 vs 0.69 μg/L, P=0.006), and V (0.07 vs 0.03 μg/L, P<0.001).
Differences between populations from eastern Croatian areas exposed to heavy and populations exposed to moderate fighting point to the need for extensive monitoring of metal and metalloid exposure, emphasizing the role of biomonitoring through ecologic and preventive activities.
Full-textDOI: · Available from: Josip Milas, Jun 02, 2015
SourceAvailable from: Ali Borzabadi-Farahani[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abstract: Biocompatibility and resistance to biodeterioration of materials has been studied using various approaches, including the analysis of various markers of exposure, both in vitro and in vivo. The possible release of trace elements during orthodontic treatment and their potential toxicity to patients have been an increasing concern. The wide range of appliances routinely used during orthodontic treatment is typically made of alloys which may contain cobalt, chromium, iron, nickel, and titanium, of which the major concern is nickel. Nickel concentrations in humans undergoing orthodontic treatment have been assessed in many investigations, although few have specifically examined urine specimens. Urinary nickel concentrations can reflect systemic levels in whole organisms, and as a non-invasive means of study, urine analysis can easily achieve the compliance of participants and guardians. In addition, the predominant metabolic route of nickel is through the kidneys. Therefore, urinary samples are seen as a good indicator for monitoring trace metals released from orthodontic appliances. According to the literature, metal ions are released only in the initial stage of the treatment. Thus, the duration of our study was limited to the first 6 months of treatment. Since urinary nickel levels of adolescents in the initial period of fixed orthodontic treatment are being investigated and reported for the first time in this paper, the aim of our study is to quantitatively evaluate urinary nickel levels and further to summarize the dynamic metabolic regularity of systemic nickel for adolescents in the initial period of fixed orthodontic treatment.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Literature data on Chromium show that trivalent chromium has low acute and long term toxicity whilst hexavalent chromium is acutely toxic and produces long term effects on hematological parameters and liver. Continuous exposure to high concentrations of hexavalent chromium in drinking water results in intestinal tumors in mice but not rats. However, evidence of the carcinogenic potential of chromium has been demonstrated in rats but not consistently in mice. Cr (III) organic complexes (chromium picolinate) did not show evident adverse effects after repeated oral exposure. Both in vitro and in vivo data show that trivalent chromium is not genotoxic whilst hexavalent chromium is genotoxic. Chromium has been shown to affect sperm, estrous cycle and fetal development. Human toxicity data reveals mixed results but there is some evidence that hexavalent chromium can increase the risk of cancer. Data on Nickel show that nickel soluble compounds (nickel sulphate, nickel chloride or nickel nitrate) have acute and long term toxicity and produce oxidative stress and long term effects on liver. Less soluble compounds (nickel sulfides or nickel oxides) are less toxic. Nickel shows genotoxic effects both in vitro and in vivo. Only a limited number of studies on carcinogenic effects after oral exposure to nickel compounds are available. These studies showed no neoplastic effects in rats after oral administration. Nickel has been shown to affect sperm, live litter size and post-implantation loss. Teratogenic effects are reported on Amphibian embryos. Nickel can affect neurodifferentiation, the T-cell system and suppress the activity of natural killer cells. Human data reveals that nickel is excreted in the urine following oral exposure and that this increases with increasing age. There is some evidence that nickel might promote oral cancer etiology but no clear evidence that nickel can increase the risk of respiratory cancer.EFSA external scientific report, http://www.efsa.europa.eu/de/supporting/doc/478e.pdf; 02/2015
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In spite of the ease with which samples may be collected and the stability of the samples after collection, the use of hair mineral analysis for monitoring environmental exposures and evaluating heavy metal poisonings has remained controversial since its initial applications for these purposes in the early 1950s. Among the major arguments against using hair mineral analysis in general were the absence of biokinetic models and/or metabolic data that adequately described the incorporation of trace elements into the hair, the absence of correlations between the concentrations of trace elements in the hair and their concentrations in other tissues, the inability to distinguish between trace elements that were deposited in the hair endogenously and those that were deposited on the hair exogenously, the absence of reliable reference ranges for interpreting the results of hair mineral analysis and a lack of standard procedures for the collecting, preparing and analyzing the hair samples. The developments of the past two decades addressing these objections are reviewed here, and arguments supporting the use of hair analysis for monitoring environmental and/or occupational exposures to uranium are made on the basis of the information presented in this review.Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 11/2014; 49(13):1578-1587. DOI:10.1080/10934529.2014.938535 · 1.14 Impact Factor