Association Between Implementation of a Medical Team Training Program and Surgical Mortality

National Center for Patient Safety, Department of Veterans Affairs, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 35.29). 10/2010; 304(15):1693-700. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1506
Source: PubMed


There is insufficient information about the effectiveness of medical team training on surgical outcomes. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a formalized medical team training program for operating room personnel on a national level.
To determine whether an association existed between the VHA Medical Team Training program and surgical outcomes.
A retrospective health services study with a contemporaneous control group was conducted. Outcome data were obtained from the VHA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) and from structured interviews in fiscal years 2006 to 2008. The analysis included 182,409 sampled procedures from 108 VHA facilities that provided care to veterans. The VHA's nationwide training program required briefings and debriefings in the operating room and included checklists as an integral part of this process. The training included 2 months of preparation, a 1-day conference, and 1 year of quarterly coaching interviews
The rate of change in the mortality rate 1 year after facilities enrolled in the training program compared with the year before and with nontraining sites.
The 74 facilities in the training program experienced an 18% reduction in annual mortality (rate ratio [RR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.91; P = .01) compared with a 7% decrease among the 34 facilities that had not yet undergone training (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.80-1.06; P = .59). The risk-adjusted mortality rates at baseline were 17 per 1000 procedures per year for the trained facilities and 15 per 1000 procedures per year for the nontrained facilities. At the end of the study, the rates were 14 per 1000 procedures per year for both groups. Propensity matching of the trained and nontrained groups demonstrated that the decline in the risk-adjusted surgical mortality rate was about 50% greater in the training group (RR,1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.07; P = .01) than in the nontraining group. A dose-response relationship for additional quarters of the training program was also demonstrated: for every quarter of the training program, a reduction of 0.5 deaths per 1000 procedures occurred (95% CI, 0.2-1.0; P = .001).
Participation in the VHA Medical Team Training program was associated with lower surgical mortality.

Download full-text


Available from: Douglas E Paull,
96 Reads
  • Source
    • "Analysis of job advertisements and employer and student surveys have shown groupwork skills to be one of the most sort after attributes in graduates (Bennett 2002; Branine 2008; CBI 2009). This demand is driven by workplace studies showing effective groupwork skills to be associated with higher performance, more positive attitudes , error reduction, decreased staff-turnover and absenteeism, and even reduced mortality rates in hospitals (Earley and Mosakowski 2000; Morey et al. 2002; Mullen and Copper 1995; Neily et al. 2010; Xie and Johns 2000). Although groupwork is widely embedded within higher education curriculum, an assumption is made that students are able to function well in groups, and that simply assigning students to conduct work in groups will further develop their groupwork skills (Homan and Poel 1999; Prichard et al. 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Groupwork is an increasingly popular method of learning in higher education and the ability to work effectively with others is important for academic success and employability. This systematic review investigated the use of outdoor adventure education (OAE) in facilitating the development of transferable groupwork skills in higher education. The studies reviewed provided some support in favour of OAE benefitting students’ per- ceived groupwork skills, the functioning of existing student work groups, attitudes and confidence towards groupwork, and the cooperative and social environment within higher education. However, this evidence was limited by methodological weaknesses such as the use of non-validated questionnaires and a variety of problems with study design and analytical methods. Research was also lacking into the long-term impact of OAE on students’ groupwork behaviour and their experience of higher education and subsequent employability. Recommendations are made to advance this area of research, including the use of training evaluation models for more rigorous assessments of skill development and transfer.
    Higher Education 03/2015; 69:567-582. DOI:10.1007/s10734-014-9791-4 · 1.06 Impact Factor
    • "address the human factor issues and improve patient safety by building up team skills and improving individual cognitive abilities (Gaba et al. 1998). Training and assessment of NTS for individuals or teams in healthcare have been shown to improve safe and efficient performance in the operating room (OR) (Neily et al. 2010). Specific positive effects have been reported regarding communication, teamwork and technical performance. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Focus on patient safety has increased over the last decades; however, patient safety still relies on technology and the performance of healthcare professionals. Technology improves rapidly but despite numerous reports on how to improve the performance of healthcare professionals, this improvement has been more slow than expected. The performance of healthcare professionals is a product of each individual’s medical knowledge, technical and non-technical skills as well as the settings in which these skills are used. Training and the assessment of non-technical skills for individuals or teams in healthcare have shown to improve a safe and efficient performance. However, the implementation has been slow. One reason for this might be the shortage of assessment instrument to assess individuals’ and teams’ non-technical skills. In this paper, we review the development process of 23 instruments for assessment of non-technical skills for individuals or teams within healthcare. The instruments are mainly for use in the operating room or for teams handling emergency situations. Several of the instruments are developed based on a thorough needs analysis by a team having the same professional background as the target group. Most of the instruments consist of almost the same categories of non-technical skills and many use behavioural markers. Overall, the instruments have been validated to some extent, but there is room for improvement. However, there seems to be a lack of training of the raters. The importance of providing feedback after the assessment is emphasised. The criteria on which the behavioural markers are developed should undergo continuous changes, representing the development of the patient safety culture in healthcare organisations.
    Cognition Technology and Work 02/2015; 17(1). DOI:10.1007/s10111-014-0306-y · 1.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Patients and their families can also be conceptualized as part of the care team, not just the object of technical work [4]. Emerging evidence from across clinical domains clearly demonstrates an association between the quality of teamwork and a broad variety of patient harms [5] [6] as well as the positive impact of team improvement strategies on perceptions of [7] [8] and objectively observed teamwork [9], safety culture [10], error rates and process efficiencies [11] [12], and even patient outcomes such as mortality and complications [13]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Teamwork is essential for ensuring the quality and safety of healthcare delivery in the intensive care unit (ICU). This article addresses what we know about teamwork, team tasks, and team improvement strategies in the ICU to identify the strengths and limitations of the existing knowledge base to guide future research. Methods A key word search of the PubMed database was conducted in February 2013. Key word combinations focused on three areas: (1) teamwork, (2) the ICU, and (3), training/quality improvement interventions. All studies that investigated teamwork, team tasks, or team interventions within the ICU (i.e., intradepartment) were selected for inclusion. Results Teamwork has been investigated across an array of research contexts and task types. The terminology used to describe team factors varied considerably across studies. The most common team tasks involved strategy and goal formulation. Team training and structured protocols were the most widely implemented quality improvement strategies. Conclusions Team research is burgeoning in the ICU, yet low hanging fruit remains that can further advance the science of teams in the ICU if addressed. Constructs must be defined and theoretical frameworks should be referenced. The functional characteristics of tasks should also be reported to help determine the extent to which study results might generalize to other contexts of work.
    Journal of Critical Care 12/2014; 29(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.025 · 2.00 Impact Factor
Show more