Article

Association Between Implementation of a Medical Team Training Program and Surgical Mortality

National Center for Patient Safety, Department of Veterans Affairs, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 10/2010; 304(15):1693-700. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1506
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There is insufficient information about the effectiveness of medical team training on surgical outcomes. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a formalized medical team training program for operating room personnel on a national level.
To determine whether an association existed between the VHA Medical Team Training program and surgical outcomes.
A retrospective health services study with a contemporaneous control group was conducted. Outcome data were obtained from the VHA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) and from structured interviews in fiscal years 2006 to 2008. The analysis included 182,409 sampled procedures from 108 VHA facilities that provided care to veterans. The VHA's nationwide training program required briefings and debriefings in the operating room and included checklists as an integral part of this process. The training included 2 months of preparation, a 1-day conference, and 1 year of quarterly coaching interviews
The rate of change in the mortality rate 1 year after facilities enrolled in the training program compared with the year before and with nontraining sites.
The 74 facilities in the training program experienced an 18% reduction in annual mortality (rate ratio [RR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.91; P = .01) compared with a 7% decrease among the 34 facilities that had not yet undergone training (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.80-1.06; P = .59). The risk-adjusted mortality rates at baseline were 17 per 1000 procedures per year for the trained facilities and 15 per 1000 procedures per year for the nontrained facilities. At the end of the study, the rates were 14 per 1000 procedures per year for both groups. Propensity matching of the trained and nontrained groups demonstrated that the decline in the risk-adjusted surgical mortality rate was about 50% greater in the training group (RR,1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.07; P = .01) than in the nontraining group. A dose-response relationship for additional quarters of the training program was also demonstrated: for every quarter of the training program, a reduction of 0.5 deaths per 1000 procedures occurred (95% CI, 0.2-1.0; P = .001).
Participation in the VHA Medical Team Training program was associated with lower surgical mortality.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Douglas E Paull, Jul 07, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
363 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Groupwork is an increasingly popular method of learning in higher education and the ability to work effectively with others is important for academic success and employability. This systematic review investigated the use of outdoor adventure education (OAE) in facilitating the development of transferable groupwork skills in higher education. The studies reviewed provided some support in favour of OAE benefitting students’ per- ceived groupwork skills, the functioning of existing student work groups, attitudes and confidence towards groupwork, and the cooperative and social environment within higher education. However, this evidence was limited by methodological weaknesses such as the use of non-validated questionnaires and a variety of problems with study design and analytical methods. Research was also lacking into the long-term impact of OAE on students’ groupwork behaviour and their experience of higher education and subsequent employability. Recommendations are made to advance this area of research, including the use of training evaluation models for more rigorous assessments of skill development and transfer.
    Higher Education 03/2015; 69:567-582. DOI:10.1007/s10734-014-9791-4 · 1.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Teamwork is essential for ensuring the quality and safety of healthcare delivery in the intensive care unit (ICU). This article addresses what we know about teamwork, team tasks, and team improvement strategies in the ICU to identify the strengths and limitations of the existing knowledge base to guide future research. Methods A key word search of the PubMed database was conducted in February 2013. Key word combinations focused on three areas: (1) teamwork, (2) the ICU, and (3), training/quality improvement interventions. All studies that investigated teamwork, team tasks, or team interventions within the ICU (i.e., intradepartment) were selected for inclusion. Results Teamwork has been investigated across an array of research contexts and task types. The terminology used to describe team factors varied considerably across studies. The most common team tasks involved strategy and goal formulation. Team training and structured protocols were the most widely implemented quality improvement strategies. Conclusions Team research is burgeoning in the ICU, yet low hanging fruit remains that can further advance the science of teams in the ICU if addressed. Constructs must be defined and theoretical frameworks should be referenced. The functional characteristics of tasks should also be reported to help determine the extent to which study results might generalize to other contexts of work.
    Journal of Critical Care 12/2014; 29(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.025 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    05/2014, Degree: Phd, Supervisor: Per Odenrick, Gerd Johansson, Per Anders Larsson