Article

PiggyBac transposon mutagenesis: a tool for cancer gene discovery in mice.

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton-Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Science (Impact Factor: 31.48). 11/2010; 330(6007):1104-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1193004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Transposons are mobile DNA segments that can disrupt gene function by inserting in or near genes. Here, we show that insertional mutagenesis by the PiggyBac transposon can be used for cancer gene discovery in mice. PiggyBac transposition in genetically engineered transposon-transposase mice induced cancers whose type (hematopoietic versus solid) and latency were dependent on the regulatory elements introduced into transposons. Analysis of 63 hematopoietic tumors revealed that PiggyBac is capable of genome-wide mutagenesis. The PiggyBac screen uncovered many cancer genes not identified in previous retroviral or Sleeping Beauty transposon screens, including Spic, which encodes a PU.1-related transcription factor, and Hdac7, a histone deacetylase gene. PiggyBac and Sleeping Beauty have different integration preferences. To maximize the utility of the tool, we engineered 21 mouse lines to be compatible with both transposon systems in constitutive, tissue- or temporal-specific mutagenesis. Mice with different transposon types, copy numbers, and chromosomal locations support wide applicability.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
150 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transposons are widely used for genetic engineering in various model organisms. Recently, piggyBac (PB) has been developed as a transposable and efficient gene transfer tool in mammalian cells. In the present study, we developed three types of PB transposon systems containing a dual plasmid system (DPS), a single plasmid system (SPS), and a DNA-mRNA combined system (DRPS) and characterized their basic properties in HEK293 cells. The basic elements of the donor plasmid included a selectable-reporter gene expression cassette, two loxP sites in the same orientation, a multiple cloning site, and two chicken β-globin insulator core elements. We further identified the function of the selectable-reporter and examined PB integration sites in the human genome. Moreover, we compared the transposition efficacy and found that SPS transposed more efficiently, as compared to DPS; integration into the host genome was determined by measuring PBase activity. Results discovered the loss of PBase activity in the DRPS, indicating that this system is much more biologically safe, as compared to DPS and SPS. Finally, we employed the DRPS to successfully perform a gene delivery into bovine mammary epithelial cells (BMECs). Taken together, the information from this study will improve the flexibility of PB transposon systems and reduce the genotoxicity of PBase in genetic engineering.
    Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering 03/2014; 19(2):350-362. · 1.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ability of retroviruses and transposons to insert their genetic material into host DNA makes them widely used tools in molecular biology, cancer research and gene therapy. However, these systems have biases that may strongly affect research outcomes. To address this issue, we generated very large datasets consisting of [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] unselected integrations in the mouse genome for the Sleeping Beauty (SB) and piggyBac (PB) transposons, and the Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus (MMTV). We analyzed [Formula: see text] (epi)genomic features to generate bias maps at both local and genome-wide scales. MMTV showed a remarkably uniform distribution of integrations across the genome. More distinct preferences were observed for the two transposons, with PB showing remarkable resemblance to bias profiles of the Murine Leukemia Virus. Furthermore, we present a model where target site selection is directed at multiple scales. At a large scale, target site selection is similar across systems, and defined by domain-oriented features, namely expression of proximal genes, proximity to CpG islands and to genic features, chromatin compaction and replication timing. Notable differences between the systems are mainly observed at smaller scales, and are directed by a diverse range of features. To study the effect of these biases on integration sites occupied under selective pressure, we turned to insertional mutagenesis (IM) screens. In IM screens, putative cancer genes are identified by finding frequently targeted genomic regions, or Common Integration Sites (CISs). Within three recently completed IM screens, we identified 7%-33% putative false positive CISs, which are likely not the result of the oncogenic selection process. Moreover, results indicate that PB, compared to SB, is more suited to tag oncogenes.
    PLoS Genetics 04/2014; 10(4):e1004250. · 8.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The in vivo validation of cancer mutations and genes identified in cancer genomics is resource-intensive because of the low throughput of animal experiments. We describe a mouse model that allows multiple cancer mutations to be validated in each animal line. Animal lines are generated with multiple candidate cancer mutations using transposons. The candidate cancer genes are tagged and randomly expressed in somatic cells, allowing easy identification of the cancer genes involved in the generated tumors. This system presents a useful, generalized and efficient means for animal validation of cancer genes.
    Genome Biology 09/2014; 15(9):455. · 10.47 Impact Factor