Advanced clinical interpretation of the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV: prevalence of low scores varies by level of intelligence and years of education.

Alberta Children's Hospital and University of Calgary, Canada.
Assessment (Impact Factor: 2.01). 06/2011; 18(2):156-67. DOI: 10.1177/1073191110385316
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Clinicians can use the base rates of low scores in healthy people to reduce the likelihood of misdiagnosing cognitive impairment. In the present study, base rates were developed for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) and Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) using 900 healthy adults and validated on 28 patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). Results indicated that healthy people obtain some low scores on the WAIS-IV/WMS-IV, with prevalence rates increasing with fewer years of education and lower predicted intelligence. When applying the base rates information to the clinical sample, the TBI patients were 13 times more likely to be identified as having a low cognitive profile compared with the controls. Using the base rates information is a psychometrically advanced method for establishing criteria to determine low cognitive abilities on the WAIS-IV/WMS-IV.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: White matter hyperintensities (WMHIs) visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common in both healthy adults and in those with medical or psychiatric problems. A practical methodological issue for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) researchers is whether to include, or exclude, participants from a control group who have WMHIs. The purpose of this study was to compare the influence of WMHIs on whole brain DTI in trauma control subjects. Participants were 48 patients (No-WMHIs, n=36; 2+WMHIs, n=12) prospectively recruited from the Emergency Department of Vancouver General Hospital, Canada. Participants completed an MRI brain scan at 6-8 weeks post injury (M=47.3 days, SD=6.2, range=39-66). DTI was used to examine the integrity of white matter in 50 regions of the brain using measures of fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean (MD), radial (RD), and axial (AD) diffusivity. FA values that were >2 SDs below the mean, and MD, RD, and AD values that were >2 SDs above the mean, were classified as "abnormal scores" indicative of reduced white matter integrity. In the entire sample, the 2+WMHI group had a greater number of abnormal FA, MD, and RD scores compared to the no-WMHI group (p<0.015 and Cohen d>0.82, indicating large to very large effect sizes, for all comparisons). When controlling for the effects of age using a matched-groups design, the 2+WMHI group still had a significantly greater number of abnormal FA, MD, and RD scores compared to the no-WMHI group (all p<0.012, all d>0.89, large-very large effect sizes). Researchers should be aware that the inclusion or exclusion of subjects with incidental WMHIs will influence the results of DTI studies.
    Journal of neurotrauma 08/2013; · 4.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Designs subtest allows for accumulation of raw score points by chance alone, creating the potential for artificially inflated performances, especially in older patients. A random number generator was used to simulate the random selection and placement of cards by 100 test naive participants, resulting in a mean raw score of 36.26 (SD = 3.86). This resulted in relatively high-scaled scores in the 45-54, 55-64, and 65-69 age groups on Designs II. In the latter age group, in particular, the mean simulated performance resulted in a scaled score of 7, with scores 1 SD below and above the performance mean translating to scaled scores of 5 and 8, respectively. The findings indicate that clinicians should use caution when interpreting Designs II performance in these age groups, as our simulations demonstrated that low average to average range scores occur frequently when patients are relying solely on chance performance.
    Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 04/2014; · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was designed to examine the construct validity of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). One hundred individuals with TBI (n = 35 complicated mild/moderate TBI; n = 65 severe TBI) and 100 matched controls from the WMS-IV normative dataset completed the WMS-IV. Multivariate analyses indicated that severe TBI participants had poorer performance than matched controls on all index scores and subtests. Individuals with complicated mild/moderate TBI performed more poorly than controls on all index scores, as well as on tests of visual memory (Designs I and II; Visual Reproduction I and II) and visual working memory (Spatial Addition; Symbol Span), but not on auditory verbal memory tests (Logical Memory I and II; Verbal Paired Associates I and II). After controlling for time since injury, severe TBI participants had significantly lower scores than the complicated mild/moderate TBI on 4 of the 5 WMS-IV index scores (Auditory Memory, Visual Memory, Immediate Memory, Delayed Memory) and 4 of the 10 WMS-IV subtests (Designs I and II, Verbal Pairs II, Logical Memory II). Effect sizes for index and subtest scores were generally moderate for the complicated mild/moderate group and moderate-to-large for the severe TBI group. Findings provide support for the construct validity of the WMS-IV in individuals with TBI.
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 09/2013; · 2.16 Impact Factor